- 29,930
- 8,486
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2011
fixedWorldstar is proof that they should have never gave black people camera phones.....This is coming from a person with very little grasp of logicblack man......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
fixedWorldstar is proof that they should have never gave black people camera phones.....This is coming from a person with very little grasp of logicblack man......
Nobody compared it to child porn. YOU misunderstood what dude said.13 pgs and that's all ppl have been saying? Nah.
So wshh is a problem and?
I think you should read through this thread when ppl say wshh isn't the main problem or anything along those lines and the reply from other ppl that can only specifically focus on wshh. Cuz I've seen nonsense from wshh being compared to child porn to ppl holding a website responsible for how the youth are raised.
I'm simply not buying all that extra bull ****.
those things can be thrown up on YouTube also. I'm guessin that they removed those videos off the site somewhat quickly.^^It went from WSHH showcases people in a bad light with the ignorant behavior it shows. It wasnt JUST the violence.
And the whole CP came into the argument when ReggieKILLER mentioned that murders have been posted on WSHH, and that those types of things along with child molestation shouldnt be shown. Then OP tryed to used that to support his argument that "if you dont like it dont watch it" is a not a valid rebuttal, to the fact that WSHH has featured questionable content. Yaw so caught up on semantics that you didnt even understand what dude was sayin.
No he did not. Go back and read his post. If I somehow misunderstood what he said everybody else that replied similarly misunderstood. Most importantly even he never made that correction when everybody replied to him about what a stupid overexaggerrated comparison that is. He was not talking about child porn being featured on wshh AT ALL.Nobody compared it to child porn. YOU misunderstood what dude said.13 pgs and that's all ppl have been saying? Nah.
So wshh is a problem and?
I think you should read through this thread when ppl say wshh isn't the main problem or anything along those lines and the reply from other ppl that can only specifically focus on wshh. Cuz I've seen nonsense from wshh being compared to child porn to ppl holding a website responsible for how the youth are raised.
I'm simply not buying all that extra bull ****.
He used the fact that child porn has been featured on the site(FACT) to support his statement that the site features illegal activities.
And that featuring those illegal activities is destructive and irresponsible on their part. After already stating several times that he does not blame WSHH solely
Then you came in and said that you cant compare fights on WSHH to child porn which is not what he did in the first place.
a lot of people saying "if you remove wshh, other website will just come take its place".
this is such a lazy way to look at the situation.
just because there is an audience for something does not mean that there should be a platform for them to congregate.
for those of you who disagree, do you believe child pornography websites should be allowed on the internet? there's obviously an audience and its similar in that they both contain media of crimes being committed.
i mean, if you're not into child pornography just dont click on it right?
YOU misunderstood what dude said.
He used the fact that child porn has been featured on the site(FACT) to support his statement that the site features illegal activities.
And that featuring those illegal activities is destructive and irresponsible on their part.
those things can be thrown up on YouTube also. I'm guessin that they removed those videos off the site somewhat quickly.^^It went from WSHH showcases people in a bad light with the ignorant behavior it shows. It wasnt JUST the violence.
And the whole CP came into the argument when ReggieKILLER mentioned that murders have been posted on WSHH, and that those types of things along with child molestation shouldnt be shown. Then OP tryed to used that to support his argument that "if you dont like it dont watch it" is a not a valid rebuttal, to the fact that WSHH has featured questionable content. Yaw so caught up on semantics that you didnt even understand what dude was sayin.
But sexual situations involving children have been filmed and put on there. I know you didnt know this at first, but its happened on a couple occasions on there, its horrible. And I doubt that the website would ever be shut down, similarly to the occasion when a video of a man forcing a toddler to provide him with oral sex on camera was circulated through facebook for over a week. FB never got shut down, and I dont think the "well they took the video down" argument is plausible in this situation. All that argument does is tell people "It can be up here, but for an extremely limited time"Also this whole filming fights is a crime so the comparison works is more bull ****. Filming a fight is not in the same category as filming the sexual abuse of children.
Dray hereDifference between youtube and WSHH is anyone can upload to youtube and the video will not be deleted until someone flags it.
WSHH someone that works for the site has to choose to upload the video.
Well yeah, when it was brought up to me that specifically cp has circulated on wshh I addressed that. I was just dealing with one argument that went on here that had nothing to do with that.You're wrong [@=https://niketalk.com/members/43278"well they took the video down" argument is plausible in this situation. All that argument does is tell people "It can be up here, but for an extremely limited time"
And we need some rephrasing in that last quote lol. @derryj3
is the one who thinks that video taping his mom getting raped could be a good thing. I want nothing to do with it lol :\
Atleast we know @Master Zik
is paying attention, if noone else is
My bad, I didn't mean to make it seem like you were the one down with that weird logic. I knew who said what I just didn't word it accordingly.
As far as sites being shut down (cuz I too remember a pic of sexual child abuse being on FB and for some dumb reason I had the idiotic friends that just constantly shared it) I don't know the FBI's protocol for cp on sites that aren't solely sites just for cp. I imagine lawyers involved made a good enough argument. It aint right and should be fixed but that does raise the question of should FB be shutdown for a member breaking the law like that (I assume the member got banned from FB). so as it pertains to wshh, I'm not clear on the process of uploading a vid there or if it is just submissions and somebody (or a group) is actually viewing all of these vids before they post it on the site.