D
Deleted member 37754
Guest
We're getting a Mania in England this decade...
Where is this information at?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
We're getting a Mania in England this decade...
Wrestlmania has never stuck to one city on a year. Coachella from my knowledge has ALWAYS been subjected to ONE city. City announcements is apart of the Wrestlmania. The UFC is business model is basically the same as a Boxing Promotion so they hype their fights. I never the UFC & Coachella had the same business practices & target as WWE. Just maybe my observation iq is low for seeing your terrible idea as a terrible suggestion.You're acting like they aren't traveling all over the damn place for the rest of the year. Do you think venues in Cali, New York, and Florida are all of the sudden going to just turn down WWE events? Laughable
People still GLADLY travel to the damn desert for Coachella every year. 90% of big UFC and boxing cards are in Vegas every year and people travel from all over the world for those.
Just add those matches to the Mania card. This in turn gives NXT one event that is bigger/more important than the rest of the Takeovers, which is cool, IMO.if WM were to go on to be a 2 day event from now on, where would you place NXT among it?
Do you think WWE would ever consider a multi-year deal with a city for Mania?
IMO, just doing IT yearly in Vegas would be awesome. Maybe some sort of deal could be cut between WWE and the stadium in order to make IT make sense for a 2 day show. Get rid of the Mania Takeover and just sprinkle those matches into the Mania card. Make it like a Wrestling Coachella.
- Super walkable
- No issue with hotel rooms or transportation
- Great nightlife
- Tons of venues for indy shows
DCALLRERUNS
I don't see why not.
It also give fans longer to get their mokney right since they know 2 years in advance.
Great idea.
So because the NFL doesn't do it means WWE shouldn't.the NFL does not do it and it has work for them. I don’t see why wrestlemania is any different.
Nah, give him the belt. He is a legendAdam Copeland should have just stayed as a family man/househusband
Please keep the contents of your talks with timid and or mariko in your little corner away from meNah, give him the belt. He is a legend
Both are your understudies.Please keep the contents of your talks with timid and or mariko in your little corner away from me
So because the NFL doesn't do it means WWE shouldn't.
Not sure i see the logic here.
NFL lay out the groundwork that seems to prove it works.Yes, could make the change but why deviate from it. Besides, both industries are based on traveling. Make a designated location how they normally do it. Build it and they will come.
Nobody cares man. It’s just wrestling.Both are your understudies.
Whatever happens with them also happens with you.
dat dude chris Taker got more shirts
Nobody cares man. It’s just wrestling.
I guess that is your excuse for all the bozo supernatural nonsense that happens in the sport.Nobody cares man. It’s just wrestling.
Is that bsox and you at the 3:24 mark of this video? congrats! rian would be proudNobody cares man. It’s just wrestling.
Again, I don't see why what the NFL does matters. Sure they both are traveling acts but if your best reason for NOT doing it is "Because the NFL doesn't ", that isn't really a reason.
Is that bsox and you at the 3:24 mark of this video? congrats! rian would be proud
Again, you are referencing other sporting leagues and saying, "Since they don't, WWE shouldn't." NFL, Final FOur, Whoever. Same response.it doesn’t have to be the NFL. It’s just an example. Something like final four or other sports/entertainment that has a different destinations.