Double standards in ....

Why do you guys assume a Latino is Mexican? Just asking and I'm not referring to the poster above me. I know as many illegal Ecuadorians and Salvadorians as I do Mexicans. I'd do the same if I was them.
 
Do yall think that the way a male's mind is wired is what sets us off when we see bare breasts? Or society has shaped us that way to believe that that a woman's breasts are "lady parts" and should remain covered/hidden, thus making the nude sight of them sexually enticing?

I mean what if women never wore shirts to begin with? would we see **** and not give a damb? I've seen women from other countries and continents where the temperature is much hotter and it is more humid just walk around with just bottoms on and no attempt to shield their breasts. From what I've seen, the dudes weren't making a big fuss, but here in america a chick lets em hang and gets followed for hours at South Beach or gets beads thrown at her from every direction in New Orleans for mardi gras. I think its because its not social norm to expose breasts in america.

But then again I've heard that the reason why guys like girls with larger posteriors and wide hips and bigger breasts is because those are signs of a woman's ability to reproduce, and we as men are wired to reproduce and keep our genes going (survival of the fittest). So when men see those things, sexual hormones are released causing us to be attracted to them, basically attracted to the thought of spreading our seed. Think about it: have you ever wanted to smash a chick just purely based off looks and then when you did you were done with it. You see her again and your mind goes "been there, done that" basically proving that you only wanted to smash to hopefully have offspring with what you thought was a female who was beautiful or capable enough to give half of her genes to the child the two of you could possibly have.

/thinking outloud session
 
Last edited:
Do yall think that the way a male's mind is wired is what sets us off when we see bare breasts? Or society has shaped us that way to believe that that a woman's breasts are "lady parts" and should remain covered/hidden, thus making the nude sight of them sexually enticing?

I mean what if women never wore shirts to begin with? would we see **** and not give a damb? I've seen women from other countries and continents where the temperature is much hotter and it is more humid just walk around with just bottoms on and no attempt to shield their breasts. Maybe that's what causes the immediate stares and gawks when a woman takes her top off.

But then again I've heard that the reason why guys like girls with larger posteriors and wide hips and bigger breasts is because those are signs of a woman's ability to reproduce. and we are wired to reproduce and keep our genes going (survival of the fittest). So when men see those things, sexual hormones are released causing us to be attracted to them, basically attracted to the thought of spreading our seed. Think about it: have you ever wanted to smash a chick just purely based off looks and then when you did you were done with it. You see her again and your mind goes "been there, done that".

/thinking outloud session
It is 100% society.  In many cultures in Africa and elsewhere untouched by modern thought, women usually walk around topless and bare breasts don't cause arousal in the men of those societies.  

As for larger hips and buttocks, and even breasts, from what I've seen from the Discovery and History channels, it does mean have something to do with our subconscious desires to reproduce.  The larger they are, the more we see the woman as fertile and capable of bearing children, again subconsciously.

I remember seeing a graphic that this varies among societies.  The contrasted races and between whites and blacks, white prefer a more slender and small frame, and blacks prefer a bigger and "thicker" frame.
 
Women's breasts became sexually enticing when they were covered up. If everyone walked around naked there would be now problems. It's like porn when you first started watching it, you're not used to it so when you see it you get excited but after a while it isn't special and you don't want it as much. As humans we want what we can't have and if breasts are being covers up we want to see them
 
what im always wondering about is the whole high-heel wearing phenomenon. To me, any chick automatically goes up at least 2 points on the scale after putting on heels. So somehow, them tip-toeing around with their elevated behinds subconsciously signals to males that she wants it - like with animals when a female is in heat and the male can smell it from miles away, only with us, the signal is visual. So my qualm is that you have chicks that put on legging, skirts on with heels and then appear to be surprised or even annoyed when dudes try to mack. Then accuse men of treating them as a sex object. Do these chicks realize that they are creating confusion by visually signaling one thing and saying the opposite? sorry for the rant.
 
Last edited:
"Just because Im dressed this way does not make me a hore"

"We'll you wearing a hore's uniform, I'll tell you that.
 
Back
Top Bottom