- 32,867
- 81,537
Castro > Gandhi
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know and have met a lot of people that prefer vacationing in Cuba over the DR even.
Punta Cana alone >*
only reason people hyping Cuba is cuz its a commercial timecapsule, while novel..is fleeting.
You have never been to Cuba, how the hell would you know why some that have been to both life Cuba more.
He doesn't even know that he is black, so how would he know or understand that?do you even study the facts about how latin Caribbean started?
What's freedom? Oh yeah, for you to call yourself latino and then not "black", yeah, I see your point.vs never being able to leave a damn dictatorship?
I know and have met a lot of people that prefer vacationing in Cuba over the DR even.
Punta Cana alone >*
only reason people hyping Cuba is cuz its a commercial timecapsule, while novel..is fleeting.
You have never been to Cuba, how the hell would you know why some that have been to both life Cuba more.
i got friends who are Cuban who's been to both, my moms is going next January, u gotta be real careful how u move out there,that alone isn't a super ideal Tourist scenario vs DR having proven itself as a tourist tour de force.
Am I missing something here ?!?!?!Castro is a monumental figure to some and evil to the rest, just like any revolutionary figure. Revolution was never pretty. But bad PR against Castro aside, he is truly on a league of his own.
Cuba, pre castro along with Argentina were seen as one of the strongest countries that where close to North America. Hell, his own dad got wealthy primarily working with the United Fruit Company. Even with all the added incentives of being close to a country like the US and being blessed with the economical opportunities/benefits, the country was corrupt to the core. Large amount of economical and political repression to the majority while the dictators lived in richly secured state. His stance against that corruption is what drove him to be what he was. He wanted to bring social reform, end corruption and economically benefit to the lowest classes who suffer the most. He fought for it just like Nelson Mandela fought apartheid, so Castro = Mandela comparison is a respectable one. From the bottom all the way to the top, step by step, he fought for every single thing he ever gained. A true revolutionary figure.
The current generation of Cubans will probably never understand the true motive of his cause or why they are still poor. But those from his generation and those that worked closely with the revolution essentially worked for free. They saw the bigger picture - access to health, social justice, "together stronger" and an independent Cuba. He challenged the majority to be great and do great, some say he was successful in creating that revolution till....Soviet = Cuba relation.
So..... 1. I don't know how Trump is considered in the same sentiment of the word "revolutionary" that Castro defined 2. Putin is also a terrible comparison, clearly the Oligarchs are rich, the majority are poor. Granted, Russia Post Soviet is strong (militarily)....Not sure how that benefited the individual Russian.
If you are referring to me, my point of bringing up Putin, Trump and Castro, had nothing to do with what they are addressing. My point had to do with how Russia backed Castro, and now how Putin is backing Trump, helping to form a Euro alliance with other countries. Perhaps I should have added that part, lol, but I assumed people saw the irony. It isn't the first time I have been wrong in my assumption.^ kind of like all communists. "Fighting to make things better." Of course you have to repress and murder your people for the majority to live in poverty. It's common sense.
Sounds like a lot of folks in this thread read Das Kapital but forgot to look at the results of the 20th century.
If you are referring to me, my point of bringing up Putin, Trump and Castro, had nothing to do with what they are addressing. My point had to do with how Russia backed Castro, and now how Putin is backing Trump, helping to form a Euro alliance with other countries. Perhaps I should have added that part, lol, but I assumed people saw the irony. It isn't the first time I have been wrong in my assumption.
Sn to post got me rollin lolCall me crazy but as I child I always looked up to dictators. I wanted to become a dictator at a young age.
Considering the fact that both Mandela and Castro shared mutual admiration for another, I suggest you look up their history.
He was also an admired figure in some African countries because of his stance against imperialism and also most importantly, for the support he extended to those fighting against similar causes (specially when it never benefited him and infact derailed his relation with the US).
Isn't PR's economy in the toilet right now? Without the US subsidies wouldn't things be impossible on that island?
Cuba has a ton of potential, and I think it's the only island in the Caribbean that can realistically compete with us. They have an awesome colonial architectural legacy which isn't found in other Caribbean islands outside of DR and PR. Now the advantages we have over Cuba are the following: we have modern urban centres, with superior nightlife, shopping, amenities, etc...which Americans are accustomed to; I'm not talking about all-inclusive resorts btw, but rather actual cities with modern urbane infrastructure and lifestyle. DR manages to mix the old with the new, while Cuba is still stuck in a time-warp.Regualr tourist are perfectly fine on Cuba, it has the same dangers most other islands have, and if you're going down there to protest the government, then you're asking for trouble.
DR is such a huge tourist destination partly because of the embargo against though. The biggest market has been cut off from Cuba
And one of the major drivers of DR tourism is not the night life or pretty beaches. Every island has that.
It is a rampant poverty that makes it so cheap and the sex tourism.
Is there freedom in Wash heights? Cuz he ain't never left.
No, Cuba was a slave port as well. I have no empathy for white people suffering in areas that African slaves built. Usually, they weren't supposed to be where they are suffering in the first place, as they are also probably the descendants of the oppressors, falling upon hard times. If Castro hastened their plight, so be it. Castro could not get rid of social racism, as that was ingrained into that society. You can't stop white people from thinking that they are better than everyone else due to the color of their skin, not when they are able to point to the rest of the western world, then being able to point to the white patriarchal privilege that exists there. But Castro was well intentioned in his beginning efforts. He still helped Africa, and other things. White America loves to demonize anyone who is not white and european, so as Malcolm X once said, "any time a white man tells you that you are doing something wrong, more than likely you are doing something right."
I feel you, I am no fan of white america either. However, what makes you think that Fidel Castro, a white Cuban himself, had the best interests of black Cubans in mind? Did they experience a step up the social ladder in Cuba? No, they are still living in incredibly poor conditions just as they were before Castro. Castro helped the African countries that supported his view on communism, look at how those countries are doing now. You are obviously an intelligent person so I won't sit here and patronize you about your views, but I do not agree with them at allNo, Cuba was a slave port as well. I have no empathy for white people suffering in areas that African slaves built. Usually, they weren't supposed to be where they are suffering in the first place, as they are also probably the descendants of the oppressors, falling upon hard times. If Castro hastened their plight, so be it. Castro could not get rid of social racism, as that was ingrained into that society. You can't stop white people from thinking that they are better than everyone else due to the color of their skin, not when they are able to point to the rest of the western world, then being able to point to the white patriarchal privilege that exists there. But Castro was well intentioned in his beginning efforts. He still helped Africa, and other things. White America loves to demonize anyone who is not white and european, so as Malcolm X once said, "any time a white man tells you that you are doing something wrong, more than likely you are doing something right."Deal with it? You don't empathize with them at all?
Just because Castro did some good things does not outweigh his oppressive and cruel dictatorship.
************ really said Castro is equal to Mandela.
:x
Now I see why certain ppl get in power. Pander to a certain group and you can get them ignoring all kinds of cruelty and torture.
I see the easy bamboozling is saying they fought against imperialism and racism.
el-hajj malik el-shabazzshould have done more research on his religion.Malcolm X once said, "any time a white man tells you that you are doing something wrong, more than likely you are doing something right."