- 3,121
- 287
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2008
cls above is better than both of these
Better how? u mean looks better?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
cls above is better than both of these
some better lookin sedans out there tho
the hell is a 4 door coupe though? sounds so stupid.
anyway they all are ugly but the cls, they did it first and everyone else is just jocking now. the a7 is hideous.
the hell is a 4 door coupe though? sounds so stupid.
anyway they all are ugly but the cls, they did it first and everyone else is just jocking now. the a7 is hideous.
the hell is a 4 door coupe though? sounds so stupid.
anyway they all are ugly but the cls, they did it first and everyone else is just jocking now. the a7 is hideous.
I agree with you about the Fisker not being the fastest and in a perfect world it would be Tesla S engine with Fisker looks. The Tesla looks wise isn't in the same planet as the Fisker but I would cop one esp with that ipad center lol. Also if I had a Fisker I'm chilling anyway looking fly not to worred about speed outside of getting on the freeway and occasionaly passing people and its good enough to do that so I would be cool. I hear you though about it not being a burner though.
Fisker just seem so douchey though, doesn't it? I mean I am all for environment but to use everything that is recycled on the car and them laminating some eco stuff in to the car and using inefficient items just made the car so heavy thus making it much, much slower. It really isn't the engine it uses, it just lugs too much useless "eco friendly" crap.
Also, am I the only one that isn't in-love with the A7?
That back is just terrible, it's like it's trying to be the CLS but failed. The whole shape just looks terrible to me.
yea, cls >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any sedan you can think of
yea, cls >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any sedan you can think ofI do love that CLS too though.
the hell is a 4 door coupe though? sounds so stupid.
anyway they all are ugly but the cls, they did it first and everyone else is just jocking now. the a7 is hideous.
In terms of performance the panamera turbo is the daddy - shame it looks :x
View media item 134339
I still think the M5 has the upper hand on these - its just a better all rounder with decent size in the back.
I agree with you about the Fisker not being the fastest and in a perfect world it would be Tesla S engine with Fisker looks. The Tesla looks wise isn't in the same planet as the Fisker but I would cop one esp with that ipad center lol. Also if I had a Fisker I'm chilling anyway looking fly not to worred about speed outside of getting on the freeway and occasionaly passing people and its good enough to do that so I would be cool. I hear you though about it not being a burner though.
Fisker just seem so douchey though, doesn't it? I mean I am all for environment but to use everything that is recycled on the car and them laminating some eco stuff in to the car and using inefficient items just made the car so heavy thus making it much, much slower. It really isn't the engine it uses, it just lugs too much useless "eco friendly" crap.
Also, am I the only one that isn't in-love with the A7?
That back is just terrible, it's like it's trying to be the CLS but failed. The whole shape just looks terrible to me.
That car is ugly.
and I would much rather drive a CLS over that BMW and Audi.
damn bmw is late. mercedes had a car that looked like a turtle 5 years ago and audi dropped one two years ago.
Im sayin.Also. Postin pics of all these other whips on vossens n other insanely beautiful wheels ain't seem fair to the stock m6 ... Lets hold off on the comparisons