- 776
- 176
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
well im not talking about racism on a big scale, you quoted something i said and took it completely out of context
edit: whoops. i responded before i read the second sentence in your post. lol
Floyd on Pac - "have him make sushi and cook some rice." "he's a ******" - RACIST
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by lokid40,
- Start date
edit: whoops. i responded before i read the second sentence in your post. lol
- 215
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
According to the Nevada State Athletic Commission, there was a cut off date for the Mayweather-Mosley fight and it was 18 days which was chosen at random. The point you are trying to make is moot if both fighters weren't actually tested after the 18 window before the fight.
- 215
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
According to the Nevada State Athletic Commission, there was a cut off date for the Mayweather-Mosley fight and it was 18 days which was chosen at random. The point you are trying to make is moot if both fighters weren't actually tested after the 18 window before the fight.
- 3,291
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
Bottomline is the fight won't happen because Floyd won't let it.
- 3,291
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
Bottomline is the fight won't happen because Floyd won't let it.
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
Mosley and mayweather were blood tested the day before the fight.
it was even on 24/7 ...
btw, Pacman did agree to complete random testing without cut off dates. Floyd is a real chump right now.
getting on Ustream talkin mess about a guy he wont fight, that's some LAME @++!
it was even on 24/7 ...
btw, Pacman did agree to complete random testing without cut off dates. Floyd is a real chump right now.
getting on Ustream talkin mess about a guy he wont fight, that's some LAME @++!
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
Mosley and mayweather were blood tested the day before the fight.
it was even on 24/7 ...
btw, Pacman did agree to complete random testing without cut off dates. Floyd is a real chump right now.
getting on Ustream talkin mess about a guy he wont fight, that's some LAME @++!
it was even on 24/7 ...
btw, Pacman did agree to complete random testing without cut off dates. Floyd is a real chump right now.
getting on Ustream talkin mess about a guy he wont fight, that's some LAME @++!
- 25,465
- 647
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
the last blood test was like 18 or 19 days before the fight. it wasnt a cut off date tho USDA just stop testing on there own
- 25,465
- 647
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
the last blood test was like 18 or 19 days before the fight. it wasnt a cut off date tho USDA just stop testing on there own
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
my bad it was a piss test that was the day before
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
my bad it was a piss test that was the day before
- 3,858
- 61
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2000
http://espn.go.com/sports...ther-gets-attention-cost[h3]Floyd gets attention, but at what cost?[/h3]
Obviously, Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s unprovoked racist diatribe against Manny Pacquiao, in which he also used anti-gay language and repeated his unproven assertion that Pacquiao uses performance-enhancing drugs, was disgusting.
But do you think that it was a coincidence that Mayweather made the Internet video just as Pacquiao was in the midst of the promotional tour for his fight with Antonio Margarito? Please.
Pacquiao should have been promoting a fight against Mayweather, not a match with a guy who was suspended for a year for illegal hand wraps. But Mayweather won't fight Pacquiao. The hateful remarks are inexcusable under any circumstance, but might be remotely fathomable if Mayweather had been promoting a fight with Pacquiao. But he's not even doing that.
If he had been getting ready to fight Pacquiao, Mayweather could at least have said after the deserved uproar that his comments were just a way for him to promote the bout, even though that is a stupid way to get attention. Of course, despite Mayweather's boasts about being so smart, he's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I think he's proven that yet again. How else to explain his unnecessary tax problems and office eviction?
Fights have, unfortunately, been built on incendiary racial angles forever. But Pacquiao-Mayweather is such a significant matchup, and one that the public is desperate for, that it is not necessary to stoop to that level. But Mayweather is too dumb to understand that. He's also too dumb to realize that he's not even promoting an actual fight, since he won't sign for it. So he simply launched the attack for no reason other than that he can't live without the spotlight.
He probably figured ranting and raving, especially at a time when Pacquiao was getting a lot of play for his November fight, would give him the attention he craves.
Well, be careful what you wish for.
Mayweather got attention. A lot of attention. But it's all negative. I wonder if his mother is proud of him? How about his young children? They'll be able to watch that video someday because it will be on the Internet forever.
Seems to me that Mayweather, because he is surrounded by nobody who will hold him accountable for his actions or tell him no, thinks he can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, just because he's a famous fighter who makes a lot of money when he decides to fight.
Who wants to bet, though, that in, say, 10 years, Mayweather will be broke? Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield made much more than Mayweather and look what happened to them. When it happens to Mayweather, at least he can always click on the video and watch himself playing childishly with piles of money.
He has earned lots of money outside the ring, working as a company spokesman for AT&T, for example, although that deal is over. But what corporation in its right mind would again associate itself with such a classless, clueless person who has become a poster child for ignorance and is the very worst of today's coddled professional athlete?
I found his apology the day after his original hate-filled video to be weak and unconvincing. He said he "was just having fun" and that he "didn't really mean it." He ended by saying, "It's all love."
Well, if that's love, I'd hate to see hate. His apology rang hollow also because it came at the end of another lengthy video, almost as an aside to the rest of the nonsense he and his posse of yes-men were partaking in.
I really don't want to hear another word from Mayweather's filthy mouth until he signs the contract to fight Pacquiao.
Mayweather, who is 33 but acts more like he's 3, may someday wind up on an all-time great boxer list with the likes of Sugar Ray Robinson, Henry Armstrong, Sugar Ray Leonard and Muhammad Ali. But those are all men who, unlike Mayweather, regularly stepped up to face the biggest challenges of their era.
Until Mayweather does that, the only list he'll be on forever is the one that includes those branded racists in the court of public opinion because of their foul remarks: John Rocker, Jimmy the Greek, Don Imus, Mel Gibson, Michael Richards and others.
Welcome to the club, Floyd, and enjoy your lifetime membership.
Obviously, Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s unprovoked racist diatribe against Manny Pacquiao, in which he also used anti-gay language and repeated his unproven assertion that Pacquiao uses performance-enhancing drugs, was disgusting.
But do you think that it was a coincidence that Mayweather made the Internet video just as Pacquiao was in the midst of the promotional tour for his fight with Antonio Margarito? Please.
Pacquiao should have been promoting a fight against Mayweather, not a match with a guy who was suspended for a year for illegal hand wraps. But Mayweather won't fight Pacquiao. The hateful remarks are inexcusable under any circumstance, but might be remotely fathomable if Mayweather had been promoting a fight with Pacquiao. But he's not even doing that.
If he had been getting ready to fight Pacquiao, Mayweather could at least have said after the deserved uproar that his comments were just a way for him to promote the bout, even though that is a stupid way to get attention. Of course, despite Mayweather's boasts about being so smart, he's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I think he's proven that yet again. How else to explain his unnecessary tax problems and office eviction?
Fights have, unfortunately, been built on incendiary racial angles forever. But Pacquiao-Mayweather is such a significant matchup, and one that the public is desperate for, that it is not necessary to stoop to that level. But Mayweather is too dumb to understand that. He's also too dumb to realize that he's not even promoting an actual fight, since he won't sign for it. So he simply launched the attack for no reason other than that he can't live without the spotlight.
He probably figured ranting and raving, especially at a time when Pacquiao was getting a lot of play for his November fight, would give him the attention he craves.
Well, be careful what you wish for.
Mayweather got attention. A lot of attention. But it's all negative. I wonder if his mother is proud of him? How about his young children? They'll be able to watch that video someday because it will be on the Internet forever.
Seems to me that Mayweather, because he is surrounded by nobody who will hold him accountable for his actions or tell him no, thinks he can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, just because he's a famous fighter who makes a lot of money when he decides to fight.
Who wants to bet, though, that in, say, 10 years, Mayweather will be broke? Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield made much more than Mayweather and look what happened to them. When it happens to Mayweather, at least he can always click on the video and watch himself playing childishly with piles of money.
He has earned lots of money outside the ring, working as a company spokesman for AT&T, for example, although that deal is over. But what corporation in its right mind would again associate itself with such a classless, clueless person who has become a poster child for ignorance and is the very worst of today's coddled professional athlete?
I found his apology the day after his original hate-filled video to be weak and unconvincing. He said he "was just having fun" and that he "didn't really mean it." He ended by saying, "It's all love."
Well, if that's love, I'd hate to see hate. His apology rang hollow also because it came at the end of another lengthy video, almost as an aside to the rest of the nonsense he and his posse of yes-men were partaking in.
I really don't want to hear another word from Mayweather's filthy mouth until he signs the contract to fight Pacquiao.
Mayweather, who is 33 but acts more like he's 3, may someday wind up on an all-time great boxer list with the likes of Sugar Ray Robinson, Henry Armstrong, Sugar Ray Leonard and Muhammad Ali. But those are all men who, unlike Mayweather, regularly stepped up to face the biggest challenges of their era.
Until Mayweather does that, the only list he'll be on forever is the one that includes those branded racists in the court of public opinion because of their foul remarks: John Rocker, Jimmy the Greek, Don Imus, Mel Gibson, Michael Richards and others.
Welcome to the club, Floyd, and enjoy your lifetime membership.
- 3,858
- 61
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2000
http://espn.go.com/sports...ther-gets-attention-cost[h3]Floyd gets attention, but at what cost?[/h3]
Obviously, Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s unprovoked racist diatribe against Manny Pacquiao, in which he also used anti-gay language and repeated his unproven assertion that Pacquiao uses performance-enhancing drugs, was disgusting.
But do you think that it was a coincidence that Mayweather made the Internet video just as Pacquiao was in the midst of the promotional tour for his fight with Antonio Margarito? Please.
Pacquiao should have been promoting a fight against Mayweather, not a match with a guy who was suspended for a year for illegal hand wraps. But Mayweather won't fight Pacquiao. The hateful remarks are inexcusable under any circumstance, but might be remotely fathomable if Mayweather had been promoting a fight with Pacquiao. But he's not even doing that.
If he had been getting ready to fight Pacquiao, Mayweather could at least have said after the deserved uproar that his comments were just a way for him to promote the bout, even though that is a stupid way to get attention. Of course, despite Mayweather's boasts about being so smart, he's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I think he's proven that yet again. How else to explain his unnecessary tax problems and office eviction?
Fights have, unfortunately, been built on incendiary racial angles forever. But Pacquiao-Mayweather is such a significant matchup, and one that the public is desperate for, that it is not necessary to stoop to that level. But Mayweather is too dumb to understand that. He's also too dumb to realize that he's not even promoting an actual fight, since he won't sign for it. So he simply launched the attack for no reason other than that he can't live without the spotlight.
He probably figured ranting and raving, especially at a time when Pacquiao was getting a lot of play for his November fight, would give him the attention he craves.
Well, be careful what you wish for.
Mayweather got attention. A lot of attention. But it's all negative. I wonder if his mother is proud of him? How about his young children? They'll be able to watch that video someday because it will be on the Internet forever.
Seems to me that Mayweather, because he is surrounded by nobody who will hold him accountable for his actions or tell him no, thinks he can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, just because he's a famous fighter who makes a lot of money when he decides to fight.
Who wants to bet, though, that in, say, 10 years, Mayweather will be broke? Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield made much more than Mayweather and look what happened to them. When it happens to Mayweather, at least he can always click on the video and watch himself playing childishly with piles of money.
He has earned lots of money outside the ring, working as a company spokesman for AT&T, for example, although that deal is over. But what corporation in its right mind would again associate itself with such a classless, clueless person who has become a poster child for ignorance and is the very worst of today's coddled professional athlete?
I found his apology the day after his original hate-filled video to be weak and unconvincing. He said he "was just having fun" and that he "didn't really mean it." He ended by saying, "It's all love."
Well, if that's love, I'd hate to see hate. His apology rang hollow also because it came at the end of another lengthy video, almost as an aside to the rest of the nonsense he and his posse of yes-men were partaking in.
I really don't want to hear another word from Mayweather's filthy mouth until he signs the contract to fight Pacquiao.
Mayweather, who is 33 but acts more like he's 3, may someday wind up on an all-time great boxer list with the likes of Sugar Ray Robinson, Henry Armstrong, Sugar Ray Leonard and Muhammad Ali. But those are all men who, unlike Mayweather, regularly stepped up to face the biggest challenges of their era.
Until Mayweather does that, the only list he'll be on forever is the one that includes those branded racists in the court of public opinion because of their foul remarks: John Rocker, Jimmy the Greek, Don Imus, Mel Gibson, Michael Richards and others.
Welcome to the club, Floyd, and enjoy your lifetime membership.
Obviously, Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s unprovoked racist diatribe against Manny Pacquiao, in which he also used anti-gay language and repeated his unproven assertion that Pacquiao uses performance-enhancing drugs, was disgusting.
But do you think that it was a coincidence that Mayweather made the Internet video just as Pacquiao was in the midst of the promotional tour for his fight with Antonio Margarito? Please.
Pacquiao should have been promoting a fight against Mayweather, not a match with a guy who was suspended for a year for illegal hand wraps. But Mayweather won't fight Pacquiao. The hateful remarks are inexcusable under any circumstance, but might be remotely fathomable if Mayweather had been promoting a fight with Pacquiao. But he's not even doing that.
If he had been getting ready to fight Pacquiao, Mayweather could at least have said after the deserved uproar that his comments were just a way for him to promote the bout, even though that is a stupid way to get attention. Of course, despite Mayweather's boasts about being so smart, he's not the sharpest tool in the shed. I think he's proven that yet again. How else to explain his unnecessary tax problems and office eviction?
Fights have, unfortunately, been built on incendiary racial angles forever. But Pacquiao-Mayweather is such a significant matchup, and one that the public is desperate for, that it is not necessary to stoop to that level. But Mayweather is too dumb to understand that. He's also too dumb to realize that he's not even promoting an actual fight, since he won't sign for it. So he simply launched the attack for no reason other than that he can't live without the spotlight.
He probably figured ranting and raving, especially at a time when Pacquiao was getting a lot of play for his November fight, would give him the attention he craves.
Well, be careful what you wish for.
Mayweather got attention. A lot of attention. But it's all negative. I wonder if his mother is proud of him? How about his young children? They'll be able to watch that video someday because it will be on the Internet forever.
Seems to me that Mayweather, because he is surrounded by nobody who will hold him accountable for his actions or tell him no, thinks he can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, just because he's a famous fighter who makes a lot of money when he decides to fight.
Who wants to bet, though, that in, say, 10 years, Mayweather will be broke? Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield made much more than Mayweather and look what happened to them. When it happens to Mayweather, at least he can always click on the video and watch himself playing childishly with piles of money.
He has earned lots of money outside the ring, working as a company spokesman for AT&T, for example, although that deal is over. But what corporation in its right mind would again associate itself with such a classless, clueless person who has become a poster child for ignorance and is the very worst of today's coddled professional athlete?
I found his apology the day after his original hate-filled video to be weak and unconvincing. He said he "was just having fun" and that he "didn't really mean it." He ended by saying, "It's all love."
Well, if that's love, I'd hate to see hate. His apology rang hollow also because it came at the end of another lengthy video, almost as an aside to the rest of the nonsense he and his posse of yes-men were partaking in.
I really don't want to hear another word from Mayweather's filthy mouth until he signs the contract to fight Pacquiao.
Mayweather, who is 33 but acts more like he's 3, may someday wind up on an all-time great boxer list with the likes of Sugar Ray Robinson, Henry Armstrong, Sugar Ray Leonard and Muhammad Ali. But those are all men who, unlike Mayweather, regularly stepped up to face the biggest challenges of their era.
Until Mayweather does that, the only list he'll be on forever is the one that includes those branded racists in the court of public opinion because of their foul remarks: John Rocker, Jimmy the Greek, Don Imus, Mel Gibson, Michael Richards and others.
Welcome to the club, Floyd, and enjoy your lifetime membership.
- 848
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2008
Originally Posted by robxdrew
@ you homie. If you're going to diss a country, culture, and the people you better learn how to spell first.
Floyd looking mad salty from what the media is doing to him. It's funny b/c all the steroid accusations blew up in his face when Pac called his bluff. The dude got nowhere else to vent.
Like I said in the other thread, we may have found a fighter that actually gets under Mayweather's skin for once.
truth
- 848
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2008
Originally Posted by robxdrew
@ you homie. If you're going to diss a country, culture, and the people you better learn how to spell first.
Floyd looking mad salty from what the media is doing to him. It's funny b/c all the steroid accusations blew up in his face when Pac called his bluff. The dude got nowhere else to vent.
Like I said in the other thread, we may have found a fighter that actually gets under Mayweather's skin for once.
truth
- 154
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
boxing is "full of robberies"', yet you can ONLY cite 4 examples in the 100+ years of boxing as a sport? Great sample size. I already took care of this feeble argument in my last point when I talked about probability.
mentioning the punchstat numbers at the end of a fight DOES NOT tell the WHOLE STORY of a fight. Even someone with naive as you should know that (but then again, I guess you didn't since you mentioned that it does). You forgot ring generalship and clean and effective punching, idiot.� Those are the reasons why DLH lost to both Trinidad and Mosley.
And NO, not all boxing experts had JMM winning the 2nd fight: no one disputes that it was a close fight, and ALL believe the knockdown was the difference.
Finally did you not read my first rebuttal targeted at you? Don't you remember me saying that JUDGES determine the winner of a boxing fight? The fact that you mention so-called boxing experts in your argument is completely irrelevant. The bottom line is that PAC beat JMM the 2nd fight. That's it. That's history. There's nothing you can say or do that would ever change that. Accept it. You can whine and cry all you want, cite countless "experts" to back up what you have to say, but it won't change the fact that PAC HAS BEATEN JMM AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!!!!!
Live with it loser.
- 154
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
boxing is "full of robberies"', yet you can ONLY cite 4 examples in the 100+ years of boxing as a sport? Great sample size. I already took care of this feeble argument in my last point when I talked about probability.
mentioning the punchstat numbers at the end of a fight DOES NOT tell the WHOLE STORY of a fight. Even someone with naive as you should know that (but then again, I guess you didn't since you mentioned that it does). You forgot ring generalship and clean and effective punching, idiot.� Those are the reasons why DLH lost to both Trinidad and Mosley.
And NO, not all boxing experts had JMM winning the 2nd fight: no one disputes that it was a close fight, and ALL believe the knockdown was the difference.
Finally did you not read my first rebuttal targeted at you? Don't you remember me saying that JUDGES determine the winner of a boxing fight? The fact that you mention so-called boxing experts in your argument is completely irrelevant. The bottom line is that PAC beat JMM the 2nd fight. That's it. That's history. There's nothing you can say or do that would ever change that. Accept it. You can whine and cry all you want, cite countless "experts" to back up what you have to say, but it won't change the fact that PAC HAS BEATEN JMM AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!!!!!
Live with it loser.