Fools Wildin Thinking They Doing It Unappreciation Vol Get The @#*+ out

bscarrillo427 said:
I don't think it's just because he's gay. Just an odd look plus the fact that this forum is populated by an overwhelming majority of heterosexual males leads to the clowning. I'm a straight guy and I know if I posted an identical picture of myself I'd get ROASTED. But just cause this guy happens to be gay it's homophobic? I don't agree with that.


You mention if it was a female the dudes around here would be asking for her IG. I agree, but with an important stipulation; the hypothetical female has to be ATTRACTIVE. If it was Miley Cyrus or something posting pics like that you'd get the same reactions of ":x" and "gross" or what have you. The look would be just as ridiculous on an attractive female, but because she's attractive of course she's gonna get a pass.



Plus, I feel like attributing the criticism this guy is getting to homophobia is stereotyping gay males a bit. I see a few gay males regularly on Facebook, but none of them post pics like that. Wildn' is wildn' IMO, gay or not.



But as was said several times before this post, let's keep it moving.
Click to expand...
Here's the problem ... Unless you can openly admit and say dude is attractive or are homosexual yourself, He is Wildin but to someone that is homosexual its just another sexy picture.

I was directly quoting the dude that posted his Facebook and clearly made fun of his page because he is posing provocative in most of his picture and equated it with a gross SMH face.

It's cool that you don't think is homophobia but I disagree with you .... If by your words that was a sexy woman she be doing it ... But again you are heterosexual and can't identify that man as being attractive ...

And lastly you proved my point ... Just because you can tolerate a conservative gay man in your Facebook doesn't mean that one thats embracing his body and wants to display for others is Wildin.

A woman that is attractive can have her Facebook and ig filled with sexy pictures and it's acceptable why can't an attractive male homosexual do the same without being Wildin?

Now example .... Random pics

600


She's sexy by most accounts

600


Def Wildin by all accounts including mines.


spoiler600

Same dude .. Here we can have an argument for wildin IMHO.. No reason for all that ...
 
Last edited:
Remember when Oscar denied that ish ? It wasn't till a year or two later that he admitted it was him. Lol
 
Last edited:
cerebralarrow said:
Remember when Oscar denied that ish ? It wasn't till a year or two later that he admitted it was him. Lol
Click to expand...

That really was him?? I do remember him denying it heavily and saying it was a photoshop, I never remember hearing him say the pictures were real.
 
Keko Jones said:
Here's the problem ... Unless you can openly admit and say dude is attractive or are homosexual yourself, He is Wildin but to someone that is homosexual its just another sexy picture.

I was directly quoting the dude that posted his Facebook and clearly made fun of his page because he is posing provocative in most of his picture and equated it with a gross SMH face.

It's cool that you don't think is homophobia but I disagree with you .... If by your words that was a sexy woman she be doing it ... But again you are heterosexual and can't identify that man as being attractive ...

And lastly you proved my point ... Just because you can tolerate a conservative gay man in your Facebook doesn't mean that one thats embracing his body and wants to display for others is Wildin.

A woman that is attractive can have her Facebook and ig filled with sexy pictures and it's acceptable why can't an attractive male homosexual do the same without being Wildin?
Click to expand...
Agree to disagree I suppose. Gay dudes can flaunt their bodies all they want; anyone can for that matter.  "Wildin'" vs. "Doing it" is like an opinion. Say dude was posted up in some Speedos or something then yeah I see he's tryna flaunt his body, that's cool/not wildin', just doesn't appeal to me. That wrestling singlet just looked goofy as hell to me.

I only saw the wrestling singlet pic, and all I could think of was Borat who, in my opinion, is wildin' just as hard.

Sidenote: Thank you for the civilized discourse. Internet discussions degrade into ad hominem attacks too often.
 
cerebralarrow said:
Remember when Oscar denied that ish ? It wasn't till a year or two later that he admitted it was him. Lol
Click to expand...


calibeebee said:
cerebralarrow said:
Remember when Oscar denied that ish ? It wasn't till a year or two later that he admitted it was him. Lol
Click to expand...

That really was him?? I do remember him denying it heavily and saying it was a photoshop, I never remember hearing him say the pictures were real.
Click to expand...

i remember him denying it but i dont remember him admitting that was him. was it really him?
 
bscarrillo427 said:
I don't think it's just because he's gay. Just an odd look plus the fact that this forum is populated by an overwhelming majority of heterosexual males leads to the clowning. I'm a straight guy and I know if I posted an identical picture of myself I'd get ROASTED. But just cause this guy happens to be gay it's homophobic? I don't agree with that.


You mention if it was a female the dudes around here would be asking for her IG. I agree, but with an important stipulation; the hypothetical female has to be ATTRACTIVE. If it was Miley Cyrus or something posting pics like that you'd get the same reactions of ":x" and "gross" or what have you. The look would be just as ridiculous on an attractive female, but because she's attractive of course she's gonna get a pass.



Plus, I feel like attributing the criticism this guy is getting to homophobia is stereotyping gay males a bit. I see a few gay males regularly on Facebook, but none of them post pics like that. Wildn' is wildn' IMO, gay or not.



But as was said several times before this post, let's keep it moving.
Click to expand...

This. I hate when people gay bash like for real but I think depending on the context it could be wildin. Many of women have been dogged online when they were trying to be sexy because they were wildin. One that comes to mind is the 2 girls who are bent over with trump build that wall sharpies on their booties, but they have the dirtiest feet I have ever seen. Twitter flamed that picture lmao. so everyone is fair game to joking. being extra is wildin. homies was being extra in that pic.


jon4rd said:
I miss the days when everybody wasn't so hypersensitive about all this sexuality stuff. Like you can't even make jokes nowadays without somebody jumping down your throat
Click to expand...

pause b
 
Last edited:
Like lucky dude wasn't about that life.

Dude pulled out the gun like he was going to save the day. If dude with the knife panicked in the moment and slit the cashiers throat or something and then took the bullets. Glad that turned out the way it did
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest News

View All News

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

Site contents may not be incorporated into AI training data or any other derivative works without prior express written consent.

Links to participating merchants may generate referral or affiliate commissions that help support our community. See our policies for details. NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom