Goodbye, 2010 COLLEGE FOOTBALL SEASON - twas a great year,

Originally Posted by Statis22

That's good and all but how would they recruit relative to the top teams in those respective conferences or the top in state schools.

Say they were in the Pac 10:

They won't outrecruit USC or UCLA in California
They won't outrecruit UW in Washington
They won't outrecruit Arizona or ASU in Arizona.
They don't have a mega booster like Oregon does.
They (TCU) don't get the best recruits in their own state.
It would depend on the success they had. If TCU came into Pac-10 and tanked, then yeah, they would obviously not recruit well. They also dont need to out recruit USC in California or UW in Washington because they are in their own hotbed of talent in Texas. They currently get the 2nd and 3rd tier of Texas talent and are still out playing people. I also think Patterson is one of the best talent evaluators there is in college football. Did you ever think they dont get better talent in Texas because they have to recruit against the BCS system? BCS schools have a built in advantage over them.

TCU might not have a Phil Knight, but we just raised over $125 million from our boosters alone to renovate our stadium. TCU isnt hurting, trust me.
 
Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

You made my point for me. The week in and week out argument is a joke. Every team in every conference has weak teams on their schedule. Even the teams in the SEC. Im sorry, but im just not buying into the argument. You arent playing ranked teams every week period.
How did I make the point for you?  You are clearly seeing what you want to see.

Yes, every team has a weak opponent here and there doesn't change the fact that TCU's entire conference schedule is weak w/ the exception of Utah.



Oregons entire conference schedule is week outside of Stanford

Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo



This wasnt even a scheduling argument to begin with. You want to say TCU and Boise have a big advantage when in all actuality they deck is stacked against those teams and you know it.
Never said they have an advantage.  I said I don't feel bad that teams from major conferences are jumping them.  This "Let's feel bad for little ol' Boise and TCU" act is getting funny.



Yeah, this one is my bad. I misread your original argument.


Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

  It was a bold move, you have to give them that.
Bold move that will end in failure. They threw all their other sports teams under the bus.


Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

TCU and Boise State don't have a rival worth a %$@%.  Some teams have multiple rivals with major teams.
Ok, thanks for defining that. I didnt realize both teams actually have to be good for it to be a rivalry. Guess we can throw out Oregon/Oregon State, Ohio State/Michigan, USC/UCLA etc...


Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo


Can you honestly say Boise State/TCU would go undefeated against Oregon/Auburns schedule?
I think TCU would cruise through Oregons schedule. I think TCU would run the table in every conference besides the SEC. There is not a more complete team in college football this season than TCU hands down.

I dont know why its always about the SEC. Would Oregon go undefeated in the SEC this year? Probably not. So should we just discount them? Ohio State isnt going undefeated in the SEC. LSU obviously isnt going undefeated in SEC. I dont really see the point of the argument. There are 2 spots in the NC game, not just 1 for the beloved SEC champion.
 
Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

You made my point for me. The week in and week out argument is a joke. Every team in every conference has weak teams on their schedule. Even the teams in the SEC. Im sorry, but im just not buying into the argument. You arent playing ranked teams every week period.
How did I make the point for you?  You are clearly seeing what you want to see.

Yes, every team has a weak opponent here and there doesn't change the fact that TCU's entire conference schedule is weak w/ the exception of Utah.



Oregons entire conference schedule is week outside of Stanford

Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo



This wasnt even a scheduling argument to begin with. You want to say TCU and Boise have a big advantage when in all actuality they deck is stacked against those teams and you know it.
Never said they have an advantage.  I said I don't feel bad that teams from major conferences are jumping them.  This "Let's feel bad for little ol' Boise and TCU" act is getting funny.



Yeah, this one is my bad. I misread your original argument.


Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

  It was a bold move, you have to give them that.
Bold move that will end in failure. They threw all their other sports teams under the bus.


Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

TCU and Boise State don't have a rival worth a %$@%.  Some teams have multiple rivals with major teams.
Ok, thanks for defining that. I didnt realize both teams actually have to be good for it to be a rivalry. Guess we can throw out Oregon/Oregon State, Ohio State/Michigan, USC/UCLA etc...


Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo


Can you honestly say Boise State/TCU would go undefeated against Oregon/Auburns schedule?
I think TCU would cruise through Oregons schedule. I think TCU would run the table in every conference besides the SEC. There is not a more complete team in college football this season than TCU hands down.

I dont know why its always about the SEC. Would Oregon go undefeated in the SEC this year? Probably not. So should we just discount them? Ohio State isnt going undefeated in the SEC. LSU obviously isnt going undefeated in SEC. I dont really see the point of the argument. There are 2 spots in the NC game, not just 1 for the beloved SEC champion.
 
Originally Posted by PMatic

Originally Posted by Statis22

That's good and all but how would they recruit relative to the top teams in those respective conferences or the top in state schools.

Say they were in the Pac 10:

They won't outrecruit USC or UCLA in California
They won't outrecruit UW in Washington
They won't outrecruit Arizona or ASU in Arizona.
They don't have a mega booster like Oregon does.
They (TCU) don't get the best recruits in their own state.

What would stop TCU or Boise State from becoming the new Oregon State or Arizona State (no offense to those respective teams) of the Pac 10. Sure every couple of years they compete for the conference title but no way they're NC contenders like they are now.

It matters.
Someone wouldn't be happy if they read this.
laugh.gif


laugh.gif
Blaze wouldn't take that kindly me taking pot shots at OStU but for this discussion I think he'd sorta understand.
 
Originally Posted by PMatic

Originally Posted by Statis22

That's good and all but how would they recruit relative to the top teams in those respective conferences or the top in state schools.

Say they were in the Pac 10:

They won't outrecruit USC or UCLA in California
They won't outrecruit UW in Washington
They won't outrecruit Arizona or ASU in Arizona.
They don't have a mega booster like Oregon does.
They (TCU) don't get the best recruits in their own state.

What would stop TCU or Boise State from becoming the new Oregon State or Arizona State (no offense to those respective teams) of the Pac 10. Sure every couple of years they compete for the conference title but no way they're NC contenders like they are now.

It matters.
Someone wouldn't be happy if they read this.
laugh.gif


laugh.gif
Blaze wouldn't take that kindly me taking pot shots at OStU but for this discussion I think he'd sorta understand.
 
You think TCU can keep getting 2nd and 3rd tier recruits while USC and Oregon get the cream of the crop and still consistently compete with them for conference titles?

Schools like Cal and Oregon State have those same advantages you mention, why can't they consistently compete? When's the last time either of those teams won the Pac 10? Having boosters when everything is gravy is good but what happens when TCU or Boise State has a 8-4 or a 7-5 year? Do those boosters still donate? Phil Knight does even if Oregon goes 6-6.

What advantage would they actually gain? I mean they're competing for a MNC without the backing of a AQ conference.
 
You think TCU can keep getting 2nd and 3rd tier recruits while USC and Oregon get the cream of the crop and still consistently compete with them for conference titles?

Schools like Cal and Oregon State have those same advantages you mention, why can't they consistently compete? When's the last time either of those teams won the Pac 10? Having boosters when everything is gravy is good but what happens when TCU or Boise State has a 8-4 or a 7-5 year? Do those boosters still donate? Phil Knight does even if Oregon goes 6-6.

What advantage would they actually gain? I mean they're competing for a MNC without the backing of a AQ conference.
 
Trelvis Tha Thrilla wrote:




Originally Posted by 5am6oody72


Word
laugh.gif
IDAHO? Really though, IDAHO?
Is Idaho not Boise States rival?

Originally Posted by 5am6oody72

 they'd also have to play in a real conference and get tested most weeks instead of coasting through cupcake schedules.
You mean like playing 2-7 Portland State, 4-5 Arizona State, 1-9 Washington State, and 3-6 Washington?? That is Oregons schedule. That sure is a week in and week out grind. Or how about Ohio State, they play killer 3-6 Marshall, 4-5 Indiana, etc...Lets get real. I dont like schedule smack talk, I think its stupid, but dont sit here and preach to me about week in and week out when there is soft teams on everyones schedule. EVERYONE


Originally Posted by 5am6oody72

gave them the same advantages other programs have they'd still go undefeated every year in the PAC 10 or Big 12 like they do in the WAC and MWC.
Who said they would go undefeated every year? I dont think they will. TCU wont go undefeated next year. I have no problem saying though that I think TCU would win the Big XII, Big Ten, ACC, and Big East this year. I think they could have won those conferences last year also. Its all speculation though so it really doesnt matter.




Idaho is not a competitive rival to Boise. They might not like each other but when was the last time Idaho beat Boise? Seeing as how Boise has never even lost a WAC game at home since they joined after 2000 they don't really have too many "rivals" in their conference. That stat right there is evidence enough for me that their conference schedule is a joke and they aren't tested like they would be in most other conferences. 
And 4-5 ASU and 3-6 Washington are not great teams but they are more of a test than New Mexico State, Louisiana Tech, San Jose State, Idaho, Utah State, and Wyoming that Boise gets to beat up on. Granted Washington didn't have Jake Locker, but when they did they beat a fairly good USC team (albeit with an awful defense), Oregon State, and Syracuse (not great but they are a decent team). That's more than ANY of the teams I just named from Boise's schedule can say, and we're talking about a weak spot in Oregon's schedule. ASU was a hiccup away from beating Wisconsin and played a couple of other teams close. They are not that bad AT ALL. 

The difference between these middling PAC 10 teams and the !%#*%@ WAC teams is that the PAC 10 teams may not win consistently, but they still have enough overall talent on the roster that every once in awhile they will actually beat a really good team. How many times has a team like USC or Oregon lost to a mediocre PAC 10 team after starting out 8-0? Or same for the top team in any other conference? You brought up how OSU plays a 4-5 Indiana? You mean the same one that almost upset Iowa last week? Now how many times has that happened with Boise and TCU? It never happens because the conferences are too top heavy and the one or two teams that are actually good don't ever get tested. You even saw Stanford upset USC twice when their program was in the dumps. Say what you will about USC's choke jobs but that's evidence that you can't sleepwalk through conference games; you can't barely show up and then beat a UC Davis 34-16 like Boise did last year. In a real conference if you play that poorly (even against a team like Washington or ASU) you will catch an L. Honestly how can you say that even the toughest WAC or MWC road game provides the same challenge as going into the Horseshoe or Death Valley? Those types of tough games don't even exist within the MAC or MWC, AND they don't even have a conference championship game. 

Every team has soft teams on their schedule, but Boise's and TCU's (to a lesser extent) schedules have more of those soft teams. I don't disagree with you that TCU could win the ACC or Big East this year. Since my team is out of the MNC race and I can take the blinders off, I'd argue that an undefeated ACC (or Big East) team would be far less deserving of a title shot than one from any of the other conferences, because the ACC and Big East suck right now. 

Also if you're going to say that TCU and Boise could win ___ Conference, how many teams from those conferences could win the MWC or WAC? Oregon State isn't a premier team in the PAC 10 and they gave both TCU and Boise (the best teams in their conferences) a pretty good run for their money. Those teams may have monetary and recruiting advantages, but they also have to play tougher schedules and have more competition than TCU and Boise do. 

If there were an 8 team playoff then teams from the non AQ conferences would be forced to at least play two HIGH quality opponents in order to make it to the MNC. That way they'd still get a fair shot but wouldn't be able to feast on cupcake conference schedules and automatically get a shot at a title.
 
Trelvis Tha Thrilla wrote:




Originally Posted by 5am6oody72


Word
laugh.gif
IDAHO? Really though, IDAHO?
Is Idaho not Boise States rival?

Originally Posted by 5am6oody72

 they'd also have to play in a real conference and get tested most weeks instead of coasting through cupcake schedules.
You mean like playing 2-7 Portland State, 4-5 Arizona State, 1-9 Washington State, and 3-6 Washington?? That is Oregons schedule. That sure is a week in and week out grind. Or how about Ohio State, they play killer 3-6 Marshall, 4-5 Indiana, etc...Lets get real. I dont like schedule smack talk, I think its stupid, but dont sit here and preach to me about week in and week out when there is soft teams on everyones schedule. EVERYONE


Originally Posted by 5am6oody72

gave them the same advantages other programs have they'd still go undefeated every year in the PAC 10 or Big 12 like they do in the WAC and MWC.
Who said they would go undefeated every year? I dont think they will. TCU wont go undefeated next year. I have no problem saying though that I think TCU would win the Big XII, Big Ten, ACC, and Big East this year. I think they could have won those conferences last year also. Its all speculation though so it really doesnt matter.




Idaho is not a competitive rival to Boise. They might not like each other but when was the last time Idaho beat Boise? Seeing as how Boise has never even lost a WAC game at home since they joined after 2000 they don't really have too many "rivals" in their conference. That stat right there is evidence enough for me that their conference schedule is a joke and they aren't tested like they would be in most other conferences. 
And 4-5 ASU and 3-6 Washington are not great teams but they are more of a test than New Mexico State, Louisiana Tech, San Jose State, Idaho, Utah State, and Wyoming that Boise gets to beat up on. Granted Washington didn't have Jake Locker, but when they did they beat a fairly good USC team (albeit with an awful defense), Oregon State, and Syracuse (not great but they are a decent team). That's more than ANY of the teams I just named from Boise's schedule can say, and we're talking about a weak spot in Oregon's schedule. ASU was a hiccup away from beating Wisconsin and played a couple of other teams close. They are not that bad AT ALL. 

The difference between these middling PAC 10 teams and the !%#*%@ WAC teams is that the PAC 10 teams may not win consistently, but they still have enough overall talent on the roster that every once in awhile they will actually beat a really good team. How many times has a team like USC or Oregon lost to a mediocre PAC 10 team after starting out 8-0? Or same for the top team in any other conference? You brought up how OSU plays a 4-5 Indiana? You mean the same one that almost upset Iowa last week? Now how many times has that happened with Boise and TCU? It never happens because the conferences are too top heavy and the one or two teams that are actually good don't ever get tested. You even saw Stanford upset USC twice when their program was in the dumps. Say what you will about USC's choke jobs but that's evidence that you can't sleepwalk through conference games; you can't barely show up and then beat a UC Davis 34-16 like Boise did last year. In a real conference if you play that poorly (even against a team like Washington or ASU) you will catch an L. Honestly how can you say that even the toughest WAC or MWC road game provides the same challenge as going into the Horseshoe or Death Valley? Those types of tough games don't even exist within the MAC or MWC, AND they don't even have a conference championship game. 

Every team has soft teams on their schedule, but Boise's and TCU's (to a lesser extent) schedules have more of those soft teams. I don't disagree with you that TCU could win the ACC or Big East this year. Since my team is out of the MNC race and I can take the blinders off, I'd argue that an undefeated ACC (or Big East) team would be far less deserving of a title shot than one from any of the other conferences, because the ACC and Big East suck right now. 

Also if you're going to say that TCU and Boise could win ___ Conference, how many teams from those conferences could win the MWC or WAC? Oregon State isn't a premier team in the PAC 10 and they gave both TCU and Boise (the best teams in their conferences) a pretty good run for their money. Those teams may have monetary and recruiting advantages, but they also have to play tougher schedules and have more competition than TCU and Boise do. 

If there were an 8 team playoff then teams from the non AQ conferences would be forced to at least play two HIGH quality opponents in order to make it to the MNC. That way they'd still get a fair shot but wouldn't be able to feast on cupcake conference schedules and automatically get a shot at a title.
 
I was referring to how would they do on a yearly basis I don't think their consistency would keep up in a AQ conference.

Both TCU and Boise State have a LEGIT 2 deep. As far as this year, they could go undefeated in the Pac 10.
 
I was referring to how would they do on a yearly basis I don't think their consistency would keep up in a AQ conference.

Both TCU and Boise State have a LEGIT 2 deep. As far as this year, they could go undefeated in the Pac 10.
 
I dont think Neither boise nor TCU has a legit 2 deep.


ND Verbal Committ Ben Councell is really contemplating opening up his recruitment and if so he will mst likely head to South Carolina ...

Irish are Losing all around
 
I dont think Neither boise nor TCU has a legit 2 deep.


ND Verbal Committ Ben Councell is really contemplating opening up his recruitment and if so he will mst likely head to South Carolina ...

Irish are Losing all around
 
Originally Posted by Trelvis Tha Thrilla

Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

You made my point for me. The week in and week out argument is a joke. Every team in every conference has weak teams on their schedule. Even the teams in the SEC. Im sorry, but im just not buying into the argument. You arent playing ranked teams every week period.
How did I make the point for you?  You are clearly seeing what you want to see.

Yes, every team has a weak opponent here and there doesn't change the fact that TCU's entire conference schedule is weak w/ the exception of Utah.

Oregons entire conference schedule is week outside of Stanford



The middle of the road to top tier Pac 10 teams would probably beat the brakes off any in-conference opponent TCU has, Utah included.
Originally Posted by Trelvis Tha Thrilla

Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

TCU and Boise State don't have a rival worth a %$@%.  Some teams have multiple rivals with major teams.
Ok, thanks for defining that. I didnt realize both teams actually have to be good for it to be a rivalry. Guess we can throw out Oregon/Oregon State, Ohio State/Michigan, USC/UCLA etc...
For sers??  When's the last time Idaho beat Boise?  How can you even call something a rivalry when they're never scheduled to play again because BOISE said Idaho's not worth their time?

Originally Posted by Trelvis Tha Thrilla

Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo


Can you honestly say Boise State/TCU would go undefeated against Oregon/Auburns schedule?
I think TCU would cruise through Oregons schedule. I think TCU would run the table in every conference besides the SEC. There is not a more complete team in college football this season than TCU hands down.

I dont know why its always about the SEC. Would Oregon go undefeated in the SEC this year? Probably not. So should we just discount them? Ohio State isnt going undefeated in the SEC. LSU obviously isnt going undefeated in SEC. I dont really see the point of the argument. There are 2 spots in the NC game, not just 1 for the beloved SEC champion.

based on...?  Boise and TCU never have to go into a hostile environment and face a road game at an Autzen or Horseshoe and really get tested.  TCUs faced two "good" opponents all season, one of whom was a (in your words, basically) weak pac-10 team, that so far has been both teams' toughest test all year... 
 
Originally Posted by Trelvis Tha Thrilla

Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

You made my point for me. The week in and week out argument is a joke. Every team in every conference has weak teams on their schedule. Even the teams in the SEC. Im sorry, but im just not buying into the argument. You arent playing ranked teams every week period.
How did I make the point for you?  You are clearly seeing what you want to see.

Yes, every team has a weak opponent here and there doesn't change the fact that TCU's entire conference schedule is weak w/ the exception of Utah.

Oregons entire conference schedule is week outside of Stanford



The middle of the road to top tier Pac 10 teams would probably beat the brakes off any in-conference opponent TCU has, Utah included.
Originally Posted by Trelvis Tha Thrilla

Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

TCU and Boise State don't have a rival worth a %$@%.  Some teams have multiple rivals with major teams.
Ok, thanks for defining that. I didnt realize both teams actually have to be good for it to be a rivalry. Guess we can throw out Oregon/Oregon State, Ohio State/Michigan, USC/UCLA etc...
For sers??  When's the last time Idaho beat Boise?  How can you even call something a rivalry when they're never scheduled to play again because BOISE said Idaho's not worth their time?

Originally Posted by Trelvis Tha Thrilla

Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo


Can you honestly say Boise State/TCU would go undefeated against Oregon/Auburns schedule?
I think TCU would cruise through Oregons schedule. I think TCU would run the table in every conference besides the SEC. There is not a more complete team in college football this season than TCU hands down.

I dont know why its always about the SEC. Would Oregon go undefeated in the SEC this year? Probably not. So should we just discount them? Ohio State isnt going undefeated in the SEC. LSU obviously isnt going undefeated in SEC. I dont really see the point of the argument. There are 2 spots in the NC game, not just 1 for the beloved SEC champion.

based on...?  Boise and TCU never have to go into a hostile environment and face a road game at an Autzen or Horseshoe and really get tested.  TCUs faced two "good" opponents all season, one of whom was a (in your words, basically) weak pac-10 team, that so far has been both teams' toughest test all year... 
 
Dan Hawkins reported to be fired by Colorado.

Best part...

If his father is fired, it could prove awkward on senior day, when parents join their sons on the field for pregame ceremonies.


laugh.gif
 
Dan Hawkins reported to be fired by Colorado.

Best part...

If his father is fired, it could prove awkward on senior day, when parents join their sons on the field for pregame ceremonies.


laugh.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom