- 33,736
- 29,093
Clearly you like cherry picking.
I'll elaborate.
You keep equating muscle mass to being the main factor as well when clearly it isn't.
The height isn't the only factor either. Structure= frame. Do you not see the frame, reach of these MTF transgenders? Would you say they are different then most woman in their rightful sport?
Put your tallest female basketball player against shaq on hormones. It's not the same no matter how hard you try to will it.
Lana broke records. But go ahead and argue about her feelings.
Fallon lost because of her lack of skill. I'm not going to get into the intricacies of MMA since that would be pages. The ability to lose doesn't negate advantages.... advantages don't ensure a win. I don't know how else to break that down.
I provided hard examples. They greatly benefited from being trans.
Clearly, you cherry picked and refuse to objectively contemplate both sides of this issue. So not much else I can say to you. As time goes on with the olympics, we will see how much a year of hormone therapy does.
1. HOW DID THEY GREATLY BENEFIT BY BEING TRANS?
None off those examples are clear, all those articles basically amount to: They were successful so obviously it was an advantage.
2. WHAT IS FRAME?
Define your terms. What do you mean by frame EXACTLY?
Wide shoulders? plenty of women have wide shoulders.
Big Hands? plenty of women have big hands.
What exactly do you mean and how exactly is it an advantage unique to trans women?
Last edited: