- Aug 9, 2012
- 3,638
- 8,177
It’s an interesting question. They made a 5 low. I don’t think 5s are any higher than 3/4. They did make a tennis version of the 3s, which is pretty close to a low top 3.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The most bizarre was the 7’s lol. Absolutely pointless to make a low of that shoe. Not to mention they were totally ugly as an actual low.Er, what? Both models border on “lows” as they are. They’re mid-cut shoes. Every Jordan that was ever made into a low was a high-top to varying degrees. There’s not much to chop off of IIIs or IVs to make them true lows.
OK, I know I just misspoke, technically. 14s are mids and they still made a lower version. But personally that never made sense to me and I think it just ruined the shoe. Never liked that look whatsoever.
do people even really like the low versions outside of 1s, 2s, and 11s?
Only low that's acceptable is the XI ie, the rest are trash.do people even really like the low versions outside of 1s, 2s, and 11s?
11 Lows are trash.
1s and 2s the only acceptable lows imo
I'll pass on 14's but I think the rest are fine as lows1,2,11,13,14 are all good imo.