- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,315
- 70,724
Nike don’t care about your data bro lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just don’t believe that’s the value proposition in reality. They’d let OGs sit for years longer in many cases if they didn’t do some kind of variant. I have no problem with the reimagined designs. Most of us still have pairs from the last decade anywayUh yes ***** I think there’s plenty of actual data to back up that people would rather have the OGs than OG variants
I'm not saying never get OGs. Of course we want OGs. I'm saying never get variants. It's not like we've never got royals and I'm sure we'll get them again soon. Just not this time. And it will make getting royals next time that much more special. To me.Uh yes ***** I think there’s plenty of actual data to back up that people would rather have the OGs than OG variants
They just made a lot of pairs. Comparing previous or hypothetical royal releases means nothing here. They sold a ton of reimagined royals.I mean they released Suede Royals and they sat. Y’all know if those were regular Royals they would’ve sold out.
Nothing wrong with modifying the originals (like these reimagined 3s) but when you totally change the materials people aren’t going to want that
At some point we have to realize Nike doesn't look at sales the way we do. Nike's only concern if a sneaker doesn't sell out in a few days is maybe public perception but, definitely not dollars. If they built their business model on having to sell out same day they'd fail.Nah people left them on shelves
They just made a lot of pairs. Comparing previous or hypothetical royal releases means nothing here. They sold a ton of reimagined royals.
And if they had made them regular royals with “a lot of pairs” you think they’d be sitting on shelves and discounted on Nike?
Riiiiight
I know what they had. Smokey as in how they aren’t clear or tinted blue, not smokey as in black or dark gray like many of the previous retros. The most recent retros are the best to me due to the close-to-correct outsoles and the use of nubuck upper panels rather than elephant print.OG XI IEs didn’t have a smokey outsole
Why does a variant have to sell as much? They wouldn’t release regular royals in the same quantity. You completely miss the point.And if they had made them regular royals with “a lot of pairs” you think they’d be sitting on shelves and discounted on Nike?
Riiiiight
The size 18 special makes a great display shoe at $85. Better than another $150 JB basketball
You like what you like, I can't even knock you fam... All I know is that after these Columbias drop next year, I'm done with 11s.Aye, I’m standing on it . AJ11s aren’t comfortable until broken in and then when broken in they look nasty. But I think a suede mudguard would make these more comfortable and they won’t crease. I don’t see how we loose on that one. Especially if we get a nice suede like we get on SB dunks or New Balances. They will lose the durability of patent leather and you won't be able to do the quick wipe down but if cared for they will look better for longer.
Why does a variant have to sell as much? They wouldn’t release regular royals in the same quantity. You completely miss the point.
They did sell though, that’s what you’re missing. Trying to compare OG 1 releases that are purposely limited vs a variant GR isn’t fair at all. Of course they’re sitting, they made about 6-7x as many as they did Royals in 2017. And of course people want OGs more. How is any of that relevant? There was 0.0% chance of a Royal drop this year regardless of the reimagineds dropping. If it weren’t those it would have been another non-OG colorway.The point was people not wanting a variant of an original where they completely change the materials used. So no, I didn’t miss the point. They just proved that on the suede Royals which didn’t sell.
Obviously they wouldn’t release them in that large of numbers but anyone with a brain would agree if they did do that they wouldn’t sit and rot on shelves and be discounted like the suedes currently are
They did sell though, that’s what you’re missing. Trying to compare OG 1 releases that are purposely limited vs a variant GR isn’t fair at all. Of course they’re sitting, they made about 6-7x as many as they did Royals in 2017. And of course people want OGs more. How is any of that relevant? There was 0.0% chance of a Royal drop this year regardless of the reimagineds dropping. If it weren’t those it would have been another non-OG colorway.
You guys really miss what’s going on.
Of course I did. I told you they weren’t dropping these as OGs. You get nothing or you get nothing and a variant for a decade. That’s the proposition. If you can’t figure that out by now you aren’t paying attention.That is literally what the basis of this conversation is. Releasing an OG vs an altered OG with totally different materials
Did you even bother to read before you posted?
You gon' get a ticket for that one fam . That or a black eye for when they hit you in the face.Imma tie em to by rear view mirror like cats do wit they baby shoes.
I get the love of storytelling angle, but can’t a shoe just look great and that’s enough?If they did the reimagined series as OG shape, and aged look and had 5-10 pairs in total and marketed each of them in some way like they did the L&Fs I think they would have all been sought after and sold out immediately. These series didn’t have a cohesive theme, Nike got lazy.
These royals are nice, and at $130-135 borderline a steal. But the only reimagined IMO that nails it are the lost and found 1s and WC3s. No story with the WC3s though.