- 15,762
- 517
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Yeah, they are facing the wrong way on the left shoe....
The only colorways that have the OG reverse jumpman on the left shoe, are the Powder/UNC's, BIN 23, and Anniversary's.
Jordan IX *Dark Charcoal* 2010 Retro
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by xjordanhead,
- Start date
- Status
Yeah, they are facing the wrong way on the left shoe....
The only colorways that have the OG reverse jumpman on the left shoe, are the Powder/UNC's, BIN 23, and Anniversary's.
- 15,762
- 517
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Yeah, they are facing the wrong way on the left shoe....
The only colorways that have the OG reverse jumpman on the left shoe, are the Powder/UNC's, BIN 23, and Anniversary's.
- 506
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2009
Yeah they are looking real nice. But i think i might just wait these out until the price drop, like every Jordan brand release this year excluding the Anniversary 11 and olympic 7
- 506
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2009
Yeah they are looking real nice. But i think i might just wait these out until the price drop, like every Jordan brand release this year excluding the Anniversary 11 and olympic 7
- 5,001
- 981
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
Wonder if these will sit like everyone is predicting, this is a classic colorway that hasnt retroed before so Im skeptical.
- 5,001
- 981
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
Wonder if these will sit like everyone is predicting, this is a classic colorway that hasnt retroed before so Im skeptical.
- 5,001
- 981
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
Wonder if these will sit like everyone is predicting, this is a classic colorway that hasnt retroed before so Im skeptical.
- 5,001
- 981
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
Wonder if these will sit like everyone is predicting, this is a classic colorway that hasnt retroed before so Im skeptical.
- 444
- 41
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
How do they run? will i have to get a size /half bigger like the Spacejams?
- 444
- 41
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
How do they run? will i have to get a size /half bigger like the Spacejams?
xx legod xx
Banned
- 3,187
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
Outlet purchase.
xx legod xx
Banned
- 3,187
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
Outlet purchase.
- 13,328
- 11,556
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
They look nice in that pic, I can't wait to get my pair.
- 13,328
- 11,556
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
They look nice in that pic, I can't wait to get my pair.
- 13,328
- 11,556
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
..............
- 13,328
- 11,556
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
..............
- 3,436
- 494
- Joined
- Dec 14, 1999
The left shoe has the Jumpman facing the right, which compared to OG's is the wrong direction. It's not that big a deal to me and it won't stop me from wearing mine However, you'd think that all the IX's would have the same direction going on. With all the corners that Jordan Brand cuts nowadays, I'm surprised Jordan Brand used two different moldings for the soles.
- 3,436
- 494
- Joined
- Dec 14, 1999
The left shoe has the Jumpman facing the right, which compared to OG's is the wrong direction. It's not that big a deal to me and it won't stop me from wearing mine However, you'd think that all the IX's would have the same direction going on. With all the corners that Jordan Brand cuts nowadays, I'm surprised Jordan Brand used two different moldings for the soles.
- 15,762
- 517
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Same here, I'm a fan of the IX's period, but I do wonder why JB would be so inconsistent with this detail.
- 15,762
- 517
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Same here, I'm a fan of the IX's period, but I do wonder why JB would be so inconsistent with this detail.
william rivera 3
Banned
- 2,479
- 11
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
^wait, what?
william rivera 3
Banned
- 2,479
- 11
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
^wait, what?
william rivera 3
Banned
- 2,479
- 11
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
^why are you surprised? We all know they wont invest in accuracy, but they would invest in further butchering
william rivera 3
Banned
- 2,479
- 11
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
^why are you surprised? We all know they wont invest in accuracy, but they would invest in further butchering
- 3,436
- 494
- Joined
- Dec 14, 1999
It's surprising because it takes more effort to change this detail rather than just leave it alone. It's like they worked extra hard just to reverse a jumpman which most people probably won't care about. If they spent half the energy quality checking other details, there probably wouldn't be so much backlash against the brand.
- Status
Similar threads
