Jordan XI Jubilee Holiday 2020

Yes u missed the red on the 72/10s, they didnt have a metal jumpman, didnt have a mesh upper and also didnt have letters on the eyelets, and the thicker patent leather... u missed a lot
I caught that stuff but still feel that they are very similar
 
1597451481696.png

1597451494171.png

1597451506031.png
 
Again, there outsoles could be the same, but if they’re different, it’s slight different.
EF6A66FA-D519-4196-A993-DBFC8510DE85.jpeg
50743866-76D6-482B-B067-BF5ED44478E6.jpeg
40829BF2-607B-409C-827C-FE932C57E949.jpeg
145FBDFE-EA05-47A9-AD37-9DF00DC60EDB.jpeg
In that pic you’re right. I’ve never seen 72-10s with soles that look like that. If I did I would cop. Every single one I’ve seen looks nothing like this pic. Every single DS pair I’ve seen. Now I want to see if I find one like you have pictured here.

EDIT: yeah every pic I see the 72-10 does have a yellow hint or off white tint to the soles. I like this pure white better. But it is close. Close but not the same. The 72-10 in this picture makes them look the same though. Wow look at the MIDDLE two pics. The 72-10 looks WHITER. Lighting for you I guess!
C68AB6E4-D6FD-4D65-8ECE-483B6C8B050F.png

In this stock photo (goat) you see the yellow hue. Not a fan myself.
 
Last edited:
Again, there outsoles could be the same, but if they’re different, it’s slight different.
EF6A66FA-D519-4196-A993-DBFC8510DE85.jpeg
50743866-76D6-482B-B067-BF5ED44478E6.jpeg
40829BF2-607B-409C-827C-FE932C57E949.jpeg
145FBDFE-EA05-47A9-AD37-9DF00DC60EDB.jpeg
Thank God we no longer have to look at that atrocious old 11 shape/mold/last they were using for all of those years. Freaking terrible, and then some.
These anniversary 11s, though I find them wholly uninspired, don't look bad at all, but I'd like them more if the Jumpman was stitched like normal, and the number on the back was stitched. This metal-look stuff suck onto the shoe actually cheapens it to my eyes.
 
In that pic you’re right. I’ve never seen 72-10s with soles that look like that. If I did I would cop. Every single one I’ve seen looks nothing like this pic. Every single DS pair I’ve seen. Now I want to see if I find one like you have pictured here.

EDIT: yeah every pic I see the 72-10 does have a yellow hint or off white tint to the soles. I like this pure white better. But it is close. Close but not the same. The 72-10 in this picture makes them look the same though. Wow look at the MIDDLE two pics. The 72-10 looks WHITER. Lighting for you I guess!
C68AB6E4-D6FD-4D65-8ECE-483B6C8B050F.png

In this stock photo (goat) you see the yellow hue. Not a fan myself.
I feel it. This is a picture of mine. I’ve seen pairs where the outsole is TURNING to a more yellowish tone, but I’d describe the outsole as milky. Milk isn’t flat white technically, and this outsole is like that.
A128C674-B0FE-4F06-814C-E6CA51877F26.jpeg

Either way, I do feel like the outsole of these new 25ths does have a slightly more “clearish” tone, which I agree looks better. We’ll see when we have them in hand for sure.
 
whoever say anything NEGATIVE about this CW and material used,,they can QUIT the shoegame or STOP buying XIs and migrate on the LiNing/Puma bandwagon


:nthat:
 
whoever say anything NEGATIVE about this CW and material used,,they can QUIT the shoegame or STOP buying XIs and migrate on the LiNing/Puma bandwagon


:nthat:

IDK about quitting the shoe game or not buying XI anymore lol. I ain’t too crazy crazy about the letters on the Eyelets, I would rather not have it. But I guess they figured it would be too close to the SpaceJams or too similar to the 72-10. That milky/clear sole is nice though, my only issue is it gets yellow kinda fast.
 
I couldn’t care less about the box, it’s cool I guess, but the shoes are still dope as hell to me. I don’t need (or necessarily want) the JORDAN on the eyelets of any of my Jordan 11s, but I’m down with having that prototype detail on a single pair of 11s.
 
More pics of the Holiday 11s. Yeah, to me these are dope. Looks like the 23 on the back, the Jumpman on the heel, the JORDAN on the eyelets, and even the small Jumpman on the tongue detail, all are metal or have a metal/metallic look or aesthetic.

But these pictures, in particular the picture of the size tag, tell me something...
I THINK THESE ARE THE WOMENS HOLIDAY 11!


Firstly, the past two Women 11 holiday releases (The White/Metallic Silver and the Neutral Olives) started with the code “AR0715”. Men’s start with “378037” (the Concords, Blk/Reds, Cap & Gown, and Win like ‘82s and ‘96s all start with this code). Secondly, looking at the size specifically, it says it’s a US 10 and a UK 7.5, which makes sense since a Women’s US 10 is equal to a Men’s US 8.5 which is equal to a UK 7.5. If this was a Men’s shoe, a US 10 would read a UK 9.

I could be wrong, but again, I think the pair we’ve been seeing is the Woman’s Holiday 11, meaning the Men’s Holiday 11 is yet to be seen. Obviously we’ll find out.
CA1B7792-15EC-4429-8377-5A7FDED0AF89.jpeg
18C16A22-403A-4CF0-A670-3A378173222D.jpeg
622ABA34-98CB-4D1F-AD33-C548412F752F.jpeg
CA4DC2A4-6CF1-43A3-BA4E-553D08355D00.jpeg
This was absolutely brilliant. Props.
 
I’m with you yet again. Let me ask this. I’ve never bought a women’s shoe but will I just never had the chance. I would need a women’s 10.5 since I’m a 9 right? Other than that is there a difference? Is the shoe more narrow?
I copped a 12.5 of the UNC to Chi I's which is an 11 men's but I found them to be narrower than a men's 11. My guess would be women's sizing is narrower.
 
I thought it’s already been confirmed these are it and cool greys aren’t coming this year. Like months ago.
 
It has.....no CG's this year

100% passing on these. I'm washed on 11s now......OG colorways only at this point. And then Space Jams and CG's
 
To Follow up the SJ, Concords, and Black/Reds w/ these is laughable. There was Only one colorway that made sense this year.

See u guys in 2021 for the Cool Greys.
 
Back
Top Bottom