- 1,455
- 4,038
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2019
Tbh I'd rather see ovo snake skin highs than the gammas
Jordan XI Legend Blue - December 14, 2024
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by therealest1,
- Start date
- 1,098
- 2,785
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
Actually a pretty good idea. They may even be better than a mid.
- 3,216
- 1,860
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2012
Gamma 11s fit in where they fit in. It was a unique colorway at the time along with the Gamma 12s.
- 14,557
- 19,277
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
Gamma 12s were ruined by the suede, should've been all leather.
- 3,392
- 6,682
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2000
Lol at the amount of love the Bamma 11s get.
No, that isn’t a typo. Bamma 11s are bum sauce.
- 599
- 595
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2013
Neither do I
- 381
- 555
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
It’s simply nostalgia. Everyone wanted 11s back then, including me. Those Christmas releases were special. It was also the prime of a lot of peoples collecting years. Many that were young back then would obviously be fond of the shoe today. I’d take a pair, but if they never released again I wouldn’t cry either.
- 1,098
- 2,785
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
I’d like to see the cherry lows, (the white PL pair) release in a mid eventually and maybe see the black midsole playoffs, the Columbia low in a mid... There’s quite a few pairs they could give us before those Gammas come back.
- 37,730
- 15,396
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
I just had a text conversation with my cousin and he said "I hope we get the legend blue". I had to take a beat and break it down to him. He thought the 01 version was the og and I had to show him a pic of the ogs to legend blues for comparison.
- 1,455
- 4,038
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2019
- 10,428
- 22,568
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2016
Been through this several times also. Sometimes I think its not worth explaining because they dont know. And wont get it when you do. No fault to anybody at all. But there is a lot of layers of explanation to all this. Go through this a lot with guys at work.
- 21,866
- 30,606
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
The 01 was a terrible retro
- 37,730
- 15,396
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
Would've even broken down to him tbh. Better than me
Whoa whoa, proper context here, my bad. My cousin is into shoes just like many of us, but my cousin doesn't frequent NT to nitpick as we often do. He pretty knowledgeable when it comes to stuff, he's just not always following every RD or know when things are coming out like we do here. He just wasn't aware of the OGs because he never had them and the 01 retro was his reference point. We often have conversations about stuff, and he likes stuff that I don't that are considered classics and vice versa. I just thought that legend blue comment was nuts, there's no way that makes sense.
I disagree. If that retro was terrible, then what is every subsequent retro in comparison? Mine still haven't separated and are khaki/PL (which I don't mind as much now), and the PL on that retro is MILES above anything we have gotten in every retro after that. The only gripe I can see with that retro is the "icy" (term used for it at the time) outsole, and if you were around at the time, NT also provided a solution to fix that outsole to resemble the proper OG hue (a process in which I almost wrecked that shoe). I understand not liking the shoe as a personal preference, but you can't deny it quality wise, especially in comparison to anything we are getting these days at a higher price point.
- 1,455
- 4,038
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2019
Ok
- 1,038
- 3,639
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2022
Easy pass 
- 1,098
- 2,785
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
The 01 was a terrible retro is a crazy take considering how terrible anything we got afterwards has been. They got the sole color wrong and that’s it. That’s literally the only issue with that release. Ive owned every iteration of the Columbia since the original release. Y’all just be saying anything sometimes smh.
- 10,428
- 22,568
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2016
It makes the entire shoe.
- 21,866
- 30,606
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
This. The sole was damn near brown on the 01.
- 1,098
- 2,785
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
The sole color was wrong on the 01 playoffs as well, very wrong actually and they still haven't gotten it right to this day. The shape on all of them was off as well. Let’s just throw the whole 2000/2001 retro XI line in the trash by this logic. Madness.
- 1,098
- 2,785
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
Now you’re just saying anything the sole was clear ice. Cut it out.
- 1,056
- 3,093
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2023
yea the blue tint on the outsole for the Columbia is pretty dang important. Really does make or break the shoe.
- 10,428
- 22,568
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2016
The blue on this shoe makes this shoe. Its an all white upper. The outsole dominates this. In 2001 , they missed it . The concord and Playoffs had other features that an ALL white bland Columbia did not. The Blue was/is crucial to be correct on these.
- 322
- 1,075
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2012
hopefully they have the high cut patent like all the recent 11 highs, gonna bring out my legend blues and get some good wears in until these drop
- 1,098
- 2,785
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2013
Never denied they got the color wrong on the sole but they always get something wrong literally always. It sucks that they didn’t get the sole color correct but to call it a “terrible retro” is just ridiculous.The quality on that shoe was better than all my other first retro XI’s.
- 10,428
- 22,568
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2016
My posts are referenced from the look only. I never had the 2001 cause I was a broke boy back then. Passed easily on the 2014 due to my sentiments with the outsole looking near greenish out the gate. I have an original pair. They seen better days so I really want these to come out correct.
