- 19,994
- 26,209
This thread really shows how *** backwards some of these women are. I HATE social media
Chasing is for the birds.
These women need to understand there are more females that males in this world
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This thread really shows how *** backwards some of these women are. I HATE social media
They are insane.
he talking about Kevin?
Not even Fraudmar Johnson wants that smoke from kevin. And besides the more people attack kevin the more popular he becomes
he talking about Kevin?
Speaking of one sided, do men need consent from a woman in order to get a vasectomy? Did you know that women still need consent, a man to sign for her to get a tubal ligation? Interesting, one sided, right?
Nah' man, I'm not having that. Women can be just as misogynist as men, and then even worse. A woman that advocates the abuse of women, is nobody to seek knowledge from.
A CONTROVERSIAL BOOK ADVISES BLACK MEN TO 'TAME' BLACK WOMEN
She likens the black woman to a "fire-breathing dragon" and a "wild savage boar."
If the black family is to survive, says Shahrazad Ali, the black woman must be "tamed" by the black man.
Ali is the author of the controversial The Blackman's Guide to Understanding the Blackwoman and a self-described expert on African-American females.
"Any black woman who says she doesn't see herself in my book is a liar," asserts the 41-year-old Philadelphian, whose sexist statements rank up there with Andrew Dice Clay's.
A CONTROVERSIAL BOOK ADVISES BLACK MEN TO ‘TAME’ BLACK WOMEN
She likens the black woman to a “fire-breathing dragon” and a “wild savage boar.” If the black family is to survive, says Shahrazad Ali, the black woman must be “tamed…www.orlandosentinel.com
This thread really shows how *** backwards some of these women are. I HATE social media
Funny, 'eh? You know this white boy down here? He thought that this was somehow okay as well.
Should we move to White Womens?
That was ONE state. You are better than that.That was over 40 years ago Fam...
State laws that require spousal consent for tubal ligation (also known as "getting your tubes tied”) have been consistently overturned as unconstitutional. In 1975, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of Judith Ponter, who was seeking to receive a sterilization procedure without the consent of her husband...
.In 2020, Women Still Need Their Husband's Permission to Get Sterilized
One woman's viral Twitter story has others opening up about their experiences4w.pub
Bruh ain't nobody co-signing abuse. She says a lot of things that makes sense.
That was ONE state. You are better than that.
Does it count if I’m 6’0 in chelsea boots
Some states overturned this, as it is on a state by state basis. Places where they are outlawing abortion, are not overturning the law.Federal Policy
Federal government policy according to the Office of Population Affairs is that female sterilization procedures do not require the consent of the spouse. Any family planning program funded by the federal government is required to adhere to state laws on consent except for laws requiring spousal consent for sterilization, as these are held to be unconstitutional. The Affordable Care Act requires insurers to cover tubal ligation, but does not require doctors to perform the procedure against their own judgment.
Does a Married Woman Need Her Husband's Consent to Have Her Tubes Tied?
Tubal ligation, sometimes referred to as female sterilization, is a permanent birth control procedure that may involve tying the fallopian tubes, closing them or making an incision in them. Tubal ligation is more than 99 percent effective at preventing pregnancy, but access to this procedure may...oureverydaylife.com
Funny, 'eh? You know this white boy down here? He thought that this was somehow okay as well.
Say it a little louder Malcolm.
Some states overturned this, as it is on a state by state basis. Places where they are outlawing abortion, are not overturning the law.
States cannot "overturn" Federal Law in the United States.