So, it wasn’t the main benefactors of Samuels sermons, those of whom began to refer to Black women as garden tools and other suggestive epithets, it was moderation deciding that the grave digging was a far more important issue to discuss, as opposed to the blatant disrespect of Black women, correct?
I dont recall anyone referring to Black woman as such, but the thread was all over the place. I do remember at the end when Meth came in pointed out that you were posting from your umpteenth user account and you tried to lie about it. He referred to your personality disorder, but He also said not to turn the thread into a flame fest which is the direction it lead to when the thread closed.
Of course you do not remember the garden tool gifs, and the poster referring to Black women as having bad attitudes, being deserving of abuse, because in his culture? Women have no rights at all. You didn't address such, because what became important to people like you was to try and banish those who did not agree with Samuels from that thread. The sheer fact that you continue to ignore the offenses toward Black women on that thread, not only coming from Samuels, but your esteemed members as well, those of whom want to keep a supposed positive vibe on NikeTalk for everyone BUT Black women?
Listen man. I'm going based off what I saw and what the mods pointed out. You're not necessarily credible cause you move the goal marker a lot and it was pointed out that you had X amount of accounts and then you tried to lie about it. It is clear that you will lie to appear right. We've seen that countless times. Pretty certain that majority of the participants of said thread are black and if what you said is true, the poster would be on the summer jam screen.
Unless Tom Diginson is your real name, I do not see how anyone is credible using the measure that you are speaking of. If everyone's NikeTalk accounts were connected to their facebook or linkedin accounts, only then will anyone know who anyone truly is. Since this site does allow anonymity? The only truth is that the comments made can be backed up with some sort of facts or research.
If I can find the read, I will post it. It said something to hormonal exchange, and how the need to connect deeper had a sexual energy attached to it. It was interesting, and downright scary. Apparently their attraction is much stronger than that of non related people.
Favorable participation? The thread is still available for view. You clowned out yourself and got called out. You can pretend you "care" about black women, but it's all for internet reps and likes.
niketalk.com
Fortunately we also know that the mods cleaned up that thread because of the blatant disregard that many of the participants had for Black women, calling them fat, having bad attitudes, and deserving of abuse.Favorable participation? The thread is still available for view. You clowned out yourself and got called out. You can pretend you "care" about black women, but it's all for internet reps and likes.
You've also shown that you only "care" about them when their views aligns with what you're saying. If one is posted that don't align with what you're saying, you immediately start talking bad about them referencing the national enquire to discredit them. Real weirdo psychopathic behavior. You're even trying to attempt to change the history of the thread as if it isn't available for all to see. Get some help. Using black womens plight for internet attention on a message board.
Kevin Samuels Thread
www.apa.org
Stop using black womens plight for internet reps and likes. This is not helpful to their cause. Seek helpFortunately we also know that the mods cleaned up that thread because of the blatant disregard that many of the participants had for Black women, calling them fat, having bad attitudes, and deserving of abuse.
My comments stand, Black women suffer from abuse at a greater number than their female counterparts.
Here is one of my sources for which was also posted on that thread.
Black women, the forgotten survivors of sexual assault
African American women are at disproportionate risk of sexual violence.
Are you denying the truth being posted here? If I am lying about something, would not this study prove otherwise?
Seek help for your fear of Black women and their rights to own themselves.
That's about money, and protecting family interests. The study or discussion was about how siblings that have never met each other, have a strong sexual attraction to each other when they unknowingly come into contact with each other.
I love black women. Came out of one. Was raised by a a number of them l. I just know that they have to be aware of creeps like you who will tell them lies to take advantage of them.
I've been called worse by better people.
Cool. Go get yourself checked out and stop trying to take advantage of the ones you allegedly "care" about.
The only advice I seek from NikeTalk, is how not to be, especially through the example you show.
All this over whether there was misogyny in the Kevin Samuels thread or not. Come on now.
biblicalsexology.com
