- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,874
- 129,201
Yep... I'm not a fan of one dimensional SGs. Much less paying one $40M.No to Zach?
-foe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep... I'm not a fan of one dimensional SGs. Much less paying one $40M.No to Zach?
-foe
give me ddr and vucci mane insteadYep... I'm not a fan of one dimensional SGs. Much less paying one $40M.
Why trade if AD ain't coming back this year?
So you’re a laker fan. Good.a trade is made to keep the team afloat until ad comes back
if hes not coming back this season then no point of trading
What is the solution to this?Newsflash. When he comes back he’ll get hurt again
hghWhat is the solution to this?
I honestly don't think AD is hurt as badly as they're making it out to be
But....."Squeaky wheel gets the grease"
Ain't no way Lakers are punting this season. They are 10000% looking to improve the roster regardless if AD or Bron get injured. Their goal remains to make the playoffs this year.
Trade(s) incoming
Making the playoffs is just goal number 1. But when you have lebron and AD on your team the ultimate goal is championship every single yearThat’s goal now? And you want to potentially muck up the books and/or give away future assets for THAT? You sound like a Knicks fan
This just emphasizes why they should make a trade this year if AD can recover. Nobody likes Beal LaVine etc. The odds of finding a better duo than Bron/AD even with their issues is slim...like a 5 year process at best. As long as they're good to go you gotta push the chips in because you're mostly gonna be twiddling your thumbs til 2030 in any scenario