- 28,757
- 11,963
Originally Posted by DipsetGeneral
LeBron won in life. Dude has $100+ million dollars. His finances can rid all of his basketball sorrows.
If that's his goal... then yeah he won years ago. I really hope that is not his goal though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by DipsetGeneral
LeBron won in life. Dude has $100+ million dollars. His finances can rid all of his basketball sorrows.
Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
Lebron > Jordan.
Not even kidding.
lulz
Originally Posted by BallinBoykz
In Lebrons mind he probably hasnt lost yet in his career either.
Originally Posted by John Mayer
looks at SN, oh we off material goods now????
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Saying "He hasn't lost yet... because there's no one in the league that has had a career better than his" is looking at things as too black & white.
Yes, he has had a PHENOMONAL career so far, but that doesn't mean he's had a PERFECT career.
Yes, he has lost. Twice.
There's an EXTREMELY long list of players who had GREAT careers, but never won it all; right now, he's on that list.
Originally Posted by ai3mac1
Well at the end of day, all of us have to go back to our regular boring lives, right...?
Originally Posted by HankMoody
Let's see:
Lebron grew up dirt poor and had a rough childhood with a druggie mother and no father.
Now, he has a loving wife and, I believe, completely healthy kids. He can financially support anyone in his life in any possible manner. He is known around the world. He is a superstar basketball player. He seems to be have a good number of close friends in his profession and in his life.
If it's an either/or proposition, only the jealous, petty and insecure would say he has lost.
Honestly, I despise people who seriously listen for even 5 seconds to buffoons like Screaming' A Smith and Skip Bayless. Please find a better use of time.
Originally Posted by DIOR PAINT
If the benchmark is Jordan...
Then Lebron ain't surpassing +*@% unless he goes on an unprecented stretch of dominance within the next 10 years w/ no major injuries.
FWIW, he turns 28 at the end of the year. He's close to peaking.
Originally Posted by MBen32
Let's say he never wins a ring, could he ever be in a consensus top 10?
Is 1 ring the difference between him being top 10, or not?
Originally Posted by aztec06jr
Originally Posted by DIOR PAINT
If the benchmark is Jordan...
Then Lebron ain't surpassing +*@% unless he goes on an unprecented stretch of dominance within the next 10 years w/ no major injuries.
FWIW, he turns 28 at the end of the year. He's close to peaking.
That may not be a bad thing. He's about to win this year's MVP and his team is the favorite to win it all. Not sure what you expect from him.
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
The guy is going to end up being a top 10 player ever, why isn't that good enough for some people? Do you realize how hard that is? Is LeBron extremely talented naturally? Of course, but for every LeBron who came out of high-school, there is a Lenny Cooke or a handful of other guys.
Guys are playing better later in their career than ever before, why is it a stretch to thing one of the best athletes the game ever has seen is not going to be an effective player till his 36 or so?
If LeBron ends up with a career similar to Oscar Robertson or Wilt, he would still be one of the best players ever. Jordan really @%%*%% up people's perspectives about what accomplished actually means.
then you must have quite a discerning taste for identifying winners.Originally Posted by DIOR PAINT
Originally Posted by John Mayer
looks at SN, oh we off material goods now????
SN is a Lil B reference
Please go -----------------------> that way
$!$+ boy.