- Oct 5, 2006
- 8,322
- 335
LOL now we're talking about Ali and Vietnam? WTH is going on in here? Geez Lebron stans are comical.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How is 00's Kobe's Era, how is that possible, like Shaq and Duncan just didn't exist.
How is 00's Kobe's Era, how is that possible, like Shaq and Duncan just didn't exist.
Kobe is not "threatened" by anyone in this era bruh.. he's chasing history, that's the only reason he's still playing:
At the end of the day, Kobe is known as the player of the '00s. That's what his legacy will go down as among NBA history, nothing Lebron does will affect that.
MVP of the '60s = Russell
MVP of the '70s = Kareem
MVP of the '80s = Magic
MVP of the '90s = Jordan
MVP of the '00s = Kobe
MVP of the '10s = Lebron (so far)
I know Kobe haters wish they could erase the past 10 years, but it doesn't work that way. Kobe will go down as an all-time great who owned his era, just like Lebron will. Lebron's success won't erase Kobe's accomplishments. Sorry.
This except shaq was done after 06
Its a toss up between between kobe, duncan
Nah its really not debatable.
Kobe was most publications player of the decade for that time period....Sports Illustrated, ESPN, Sporting News, TNT, Dime etc etc
Nah its really not debatable.
Kobe was most publications player of the decade for that time period....Sports Illustrated, ESPN, Sporting News, TNT, Dime etc etc
So shaq was the best player for 55% of the era, and some how he;s not part of the discussion? what, so basically because Shaqs prime didn't fit into the dace perfectly he's not up for discussion..
Kobe was a top 5 player every single year of the decade. You can't say the same for Shaq or Duncan.How is 00's Kobe's Era, how is that possible, like Shaq and Duncan just didn't exist.
This is the problem with this ERA thing, it's an over simplification, like the 80's is magic's era alone, how is that possible,
Kobe wasnt even the best player on his own team for 4 out of the 10 seasons in that decade and 4 of 7 of those finals appearances. To say Kobe was "running ****" is an exageration.
kobe won 5 chips in the 00s to ducans 3, the lakers dominated the spurs in the playoffs, kobe has made more allstar starts, all nba first teams AND all nba defensive teams. where is the argument to be made here?From a casual fan point of view they would say kobe because duncans game is considered boringNah its really not debatable.
Kobe was most publications player of the decade for that time period....Sports Illustrated, ESPN, Sporting News, TNT, Dime etc etc
He wasnt at the top of his game the whole era like kobe and duncan, or even kgSo shaq was the best player for 55% of the era, and some how he;s not part of the discussion? what, so basically because Shaqs prime didn't fit into the dace perfectly he's not up for discussion..
why do you think it is duncan?Honestly, if your comparing individuals, you gotta bring up individual accomplishments. All-Stars, first teams, and defensive teams would fall under that. Finals MVPs and regular season MVPs as well. But championships and finals appearances are team accomplishments. If we're to use those to compare players, then Robert Horry would have to get thrown in this mix LOL.
There can be arguments made for Shaq, Kobe, and Duncan for player of the decade. IMO its Duncan. But there is no clear winner because its a matter of opinion, all 3 have a legit case.
Honestly, if your comparing individuals, you gotta bring up individual accomplishments. All-Stars, first teams, and defensive teams would fall under that. Finals MVPs and regular season MVPs as well. But championships and finals appearances are team accomplishments. If we're to use those to compare players, then Robert Horry would have to get thrown in this mix LOL.
There can be arguments made for Shaq, Kobe, and Duncan for player of the decade. IMO its Duncan. But there is no clear winner because its a matter of opinion, all 3 have a legit case.
Honestly, if your comparing individuals, you gotta bring up individual accomplishments. All-Stars, first teams, and defensive teams would fall under that. Finals MVPs and regular season MVPs as well. But championships and finals appearances are team accomplishments. If we're to use those to compare players, then Robert Horry would have to get thrown in this mix LOL.
There can be arguments made for Shaq, Kobe, and Duncan for player of the decade. IMO its Duncan. But there is no clear winner because its a matter of opinion, all 3 have a legit case.
why do you think it is duncan?Honestly, if your comparing individuals, you gotta bring up individual accomplishments. All-Stars, first teams, and defensive teams would fall under that. Finals MVPs and regular season MVPs as well. But championships and finals appearances are team accomplishments. If we're to use those to compare players, then Robert Horry would have to get thrown in this mix LOL.
There can be arguments made for Shaq, Kobe, and Duncan for player of the decade. IMO its Duncan. But there is no clear winner because its a matter of opinion, all 3 have a legit case.
Lol if kobe isnt your player of the last decade your smoking
Case for shaq
Dominant from 2000 to 2005
Good from 2006 to 2007
Role player from then till his retirement
Case for Duncan
Dominant from 2000 to 2006
Great from 2006 to 2009
2010 down year
Case for Kobe
Good from 2000 to 2001
Dominant from 2002 to 2010
Lol if kobe isnt your player of the last decade your smoking
Case for shaq
Dominant from 2000 to 2005
Good from 2006 to 2007
Role player from then till his retirement
Case for Duncan
Dominant from 2000 to 2006
Great from 2006 to 2009
2010 down year
Case for Kobe
Good from 2000 to 2001
Dominant from 2002 to 2010
Stop it kobes dominant years started in 05, when he finally became a leader
Lol if kobe isnt your player of the last decade your smoking
Case for shaq
Dominant from 2000 to 2005
Good from 2006 to 2007
Role player from then till his retirement
Case for Duncan
Dominant from 2000 to 2006
Great from 2006 to 2009
2010 down year
Case for Kobe
Good from 2000 to 2001
Dominant from 2002 to 2010
Stop it kobes dominant years started in 05, when he finally became a leader
So did wade n bosh add to lebrons success? People jus cant x those years out, like he was a 10 ppg player. Shaq needed kobe too last time I checked. Jus like james needs wade n bosh. Shaqs dominance tend to make people forget kobe was still the best or 2nd best sgHe was unquestionably the oncourt leader and best player of his team for the entire 10 seasons. Never had under 50 wins every season. 2 MVPs ( more than Kobe and Shaq). 2 FMVP ( 1 less than Shaq, tied with Kobe). He played with less talent than Shaq and Kobe. I also feel like Kobe and Shaq playing together has a part in this. Shaq and Kobe added to each others success. Yes, Duncan had Robinson but he was nowhere near his prime in any part of that decade.
Stop it kobes dominant years started in 05, when he finally became a leader