- 8,790
- 1,989
I like how nobody is entertaining KD in their roster "scenarios"...lol..yes..i know its 3-5%(u never know what hes thinkin on the inside..."pick up where kobe left off+room for 1 more max+developing kids")...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like how nobody is entertaining KD in their roster "scenarios"...lol..yes..i know its 3-5%(u never know what hes thinkin on the inside..."pick up where kobe left off+room for 1 more max+developing kids")...
Trade away MULTIPLE assets for Jimmy Butler rather than signing Demar and keeping those players?
That's a plan LTB? You would support that move?
You wouldn't trade Clarkson and the 3rd pick for Jimmy Butler man?
You Foreals dawg?
Who the hell you want, Buddy instead?
And I swear you're trolling if that's all you got out of my post. At least Kal read and understood the main point.
So you wouldn't trade the 3rd pick at all?First, why the blue **** would the Bulls take ONLY Clarkson + 3?
Second, no, I would not make that trade.
Third, no to Buddy, Bender, Brown, Dunn all worth looking into just fine.
Fourth, not worried about the rest of your post, I addressed the part I needed clarification on.
Fifth, giving away multiple pieces to get a guy negligibly better than one we can sign outright is bad business 101.
'S all it is.Thank you.If we end up 3rd, I'm desperately trying to package that for an established (preferably defensive) player.
Glad someone elsegets it(agrees with me).
'S all it is.Thank you.If we end up 3rd, I'm desperately trying to package that for an established (preferably defensive) player.
Glad someone elsegets it(agrees with me).
Some people have 12, others have a dozen.
CP I was with you until you said negligibly better than someone we can sign outright...whom is it that you speak of??? I hope you wasn't talking about DD bruh..
Probably not. I literally just jumped in, scrolled through very quickly, saw your post, responded.I thought it was clear by "getting it" I was referring to understanding/agreeing with what I said in the previous post?...'S all it is.Thank you.
Glad someone elsegets it(agrees with me).
Some people have 12, others have a dozen.
I didn't mean "get it" like big picture common sense rocket science stuff, just...
My post, the one I had just posted
Am I missing something? *scratching head*
Hopefully Jerry West is in position to gift us a star again.
And it's funny how #3 + whatever is a no, yet Derozan, Batum and Whiteside is a possibility. That's just as much if not more of a pipe dream.
You can't trade a player making more to a team that ha 60+ mil available in cap space? News to me.?????
They are FREE agents, being offered 20 mil each. Likely? No. Possible? Yes.
You can't trade 90 million Butler for JC + 3. Legally.
Not, possible.
So, how are they the same pipe dream?
You can't trade a player making more to a team that ha 60+ mil available in cap space? News to me.?????
They are FREE agents, being offered 20 mil each. Likely? No. Possible? Yes.
You can't trade 90 million Butler for JC + 3. Legally.
Not, possible.
So, how are they the same pipe dream?
If my amateur math is correct, the most a non-Warriors team can offer is 4 years-$92M. That's assuming there is a $92M cap next year.How much will Barnes cost?
He's averaging 11 and 5 on 30 minutes.
If he's a startee and more of a focal point could he be a 20 ppg scorer?