- 47
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2011
they arent that awful but when you see kids rocking em like they true js then
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by The Truth82
The whole ajf line should had never happen...
I dislike 'Fusions & Hybrids' but the above bolded statement is not true. If anything, the non-retro JB product has far better materials than the retro line.Originally Posted by Benssick
They look really cheap. Poor material and fail to have nice details
Originally Posted by devildoc76
Mostly I think it's the unjustifiable price tag........ The same price as a numbered retro, no reason for that.
Originally Posted by marcelwuzhere
I still have a pair of AJF 20s i dont wear, i got a pair of dub zeros i dont wear, and I gave my 60+ away, but I have three pair of 6rings I wear them from time to time.
Originally Posted by devildoc76
^ Gotcha. The only reason I say the AJF's are more is that at the post exchange on military bases had AJF 3's going for $120-$125. I bought a pair of XX2 PE's for $55 (50% off the $110 retail at the PX) back then. If the price for an AJF is over/equal to a retro, it's still too much......The AJF line in a whole was just an attempt to seize the moment, and it worked. I still see them all over the place. The worst however are the AJF 13's and the AJF 8's because neither really flowed with an AF1 sole. It's like putting a Porsche 911 frame on an F150 drivetrain....Other fusions/hybrids I don't mind.....I got a pair of the 1st wave of Dub Zero's, a pair of blk/red Olympia's( a pseudo AJ X), and I'm still looking for a pair of blk patent Spizikes.
Originally Posted by Benssick
They look really cheap. Poor material and fail to have nice details