- 105,747
- 193,777
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
That boy got some serious swag in them pics
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Isn't this from the 70s?Thank you , DSM, for confriming that homsexuality is not the optimal way of living.The only way that homosexuality could therefore be considered a psychiatric disorder would be the criteria of failure
to function heterosexually, which is considered optimal in our society and by many members of our profession.
However, if failure to function optimally in some important area of life as judged by either society or the profession
is sufficient to indicate the presence of a psychiatric disorder.
Similarly, by no
longer listing it as a psychiatric disorder we are not saying that it is "normal" or as valuable as heterosexuality.
Homosexuality: Proposed Change in DSM-11, 6
th Printing
(2 of 3)
Isn't this from the 70s?Quote:
The only way that homosexuality could therefore be considered a psychiatric disorder would be the criteria of failureto function heterosexually, which is considered optimal in our society and by many members of our profession.However, if failure to function optimally in some important area of life as judged by either society or the professionis sufficient to indicate the presence of a psychiatric disorder.
Similarly, by nolonger listing it as a psychiatric disorder we are not saying that it is "normal" or as valuable as heterosexuality.
Homosexuality: Proposed Change in DSM-11, 6
th Printing
(2 of 3)
Thank you , DSM, for confriming that homsexuality is not the optimal way of living.
looking like a black big bird
The only way that homosexuality could therefore be considered a psychiatric disorder would be the criteria of failure
to function heterosexually, which is considered optimal in our society and by many members of our profession.
However, if failure to function optimally in some important area of life as judged by either society or the profession
is sufficient to indicate the presence of a psychiatric disorder.
Similarly, by no
longer listing it as a psychiatric disorder we are not saying that it is "normal" or as valuable as heterosexuality.
Homosexuality: Proposed Change in DSM-11, 6
Thank you , DSM, for confriming that homsexuality is not the optimal way of living.
The only way that homosexuality could therefore be considered a psychiatric disorder would be the criteria of failure
to function heterosexually, which is considered optimal in our society and by many members of our profession.
However, if failure to function optimally in some important area of life as judged by either society or the profession
is sufficient to indicate the presence of a psychiatric disorder.
Similarly, by no
longer listing it as a psychiatric disorder we are not saying that it is "normal" or as valuable as heterosexuality.
Homosexuality: Proposed Change in DSM-11, 6
Thank you , DSM, for confriming that homsexuality is not the optimal way of living.
Hahaha. Dude's really going to use the OLD DSM to make his point? Feeble attempt, man, feeble. The DSM II was created in 1968 with additional printings running until 1973. Nice try.
Then why isn't it in the DSM IV? And the V is soon to release, and I bet $100 it's not in there either.
Then why isn't it in the DSM IV? And the V is soon to release, and I bet $100 it's not in there either.
Chuck, I think we are making the same point, my man.
At this point I don't even know with all the sarcasm.
Homosexuality is not a mental disorder, that is all.
Why would I?Yup, I agree. We are on the same page. I said "use the DSM III or IV" because I knew he couldn't.
C'mon, bruh. What if he changes the world for the better? What if he cures cancer, or fixes the economic problems? That's still you're son, man. You don't wanna be like Eminem's mom or Tywin Lannister, just have the world hate you because part of their success is your lack of love for your own flesh and blood. You'll still be mad at them and they'll be over you, just enjoying life and talking bad about you whenever they're on TV.
Chinua Achebe just died a couple weeks ago. You need to read "Things Fall Apart".You can hate your kids for being themselves, but they're just gonna go on living life and eventually you'll have to answer for that in one way or another.
Saying our species wouldn't propagate due to sexual orientation is one of the most ignorant things I've ever read on this site.
@ "100% fact"
Yes, I know that. What I'm getting to is, why would I use the DSM IV for homosexuality.If you are going to use the DSM, you should use the up to date DSM IV. The DSM II does not have the current diagnosis' for current disorders, hence why homosexuality was considered a disorder. As the science grew, and the knowlege was put up to date, homo sexuality is no longer a disorder.
Homosexuality was removed from the DSM for political reasons, there is still science out there proving that homosexuality can indeed be a mental disorder, influenced by one's environment.
The old DSM is the only one i can use to prove my point. The reason homosexuality was removed, was more political than scientific (FACT). That's like a dictator making "murder" legal. Let's all go out and murder some people. its OK! It's written, and "so and so" says its legal!
And that's exactly what I'm getting at. I'm not saying, one should beat their children if they're gay. I'm trying to say that a parent should not encourage it.View media item 346014
View media item 346214
EJ and his homie remind me of Men on Mission
On a serious note, if I was his father I could accept him being gay at the end of the day. Would I be >: pissed? Absolutely! But what can you really do nowadays, it's a part of society. I wouldn't disown him, however them furs and purses would HAVE to go!!
Yeah I agree, by any means I would never encourage my son or daughter down that path of homosexuality. If they choose that lifestyle, I can only be there to support their decisions. My only request, especially in regards to my son, would be to miss me with them furs & purses!! I can't get jiggy with that **** I'm sorry.
Yeah I agree, by any means I would never encourage my son or daughter down that path of homosexuality. If they choose that lifestyle, I can only be there to support their decisions. My only request, especially in regards to my son, would be to miss me with them furs & purses!! I can't get jiggy with that **** I'm sorry.
They don't choose that lifestyle, so in essence, supporting your child should be easier if (s)he happens to be gay.
There hasn't been any proof posted by the pro-homosexual group in this thread on how homosexuality is not a choice, yet here they are expecting everyone else to take their OPINIONS as facts.
And this post was the best
How do you suggest that two men (or two women, for that matter) reproduce naturally if that was the case?
Nothing I posted suggests that homosexuality was removed from the DSM, for purely political reasons?
Do you not know how to read?
Can you do everyone a favor and post up to date scientific research that draws these conclusions? To be clear, I want the actual papers that prove the point that you're trying to make.Yes, I know that. What I'm getting to is, why would I use the DSM IV for homosexuality.If you are going to use the DSM, you should use the up to date DSM IV. The DSM II does not have the current diagnosis' for current disorders, hence why homosexuality was considered a disorder. As the science grew, and the knowlege was put up to date, homo sexuality is no longer a disorder.
Homosexuality was removed from the DSM for political reasons, there is still science out there proving that homosexuality can indeed be a mental disorder, influenced by one's environment.
Yes, I know that. What I'm getting to is, why would I use the DSM IV for homosexuality.
Homosexuality was removed from the DSM for political reasons, there is still science out there proving that homosexuality can indeed be a mental disorder, influenced by one's environment.
Nothing I posted suggests that homosexuality was removed from the DSM, for purely political reasons?
Do you not know how to read?