quise2024
Banned
- 20,741
- 4,690
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2013
Those interviews brought up almost all of the evidence that mac2008 brought up as points that were omitted from the doc. I think people in this thread, maybe even myself at times, were a little rough on mac just because he held different views of the case. However, none of the evidence he brought up would prove SA guilty beyond reasonable doubt .
@mac2008 got the heat because he said SA was guilty and he did it (coming off as he knew 100% SA did it). He then backed his claim with that evidence from those reddit links and what was mentioned in that interview.
Like you said despite all of that , NONE of that proves that he did it. Yeah sure it was sketchy to use *67 but it proves nothing. Answering the door in a towel proves nothing, he could have tried to shower quick before she arrived. Requesting her meant nothing, sure he could have been a perv n just liked to look at an attractive woman he'd never be able to pull ... like most of the dudes on IG do following these ****. DNA under the hood, who knows he could have checked somwthing out for her or even if he didnt touching her hood meant what. Its not like they said he had DNA there and damage the car so she couldnt leave. Oh he purhased ropes n sex stuff, well his lady was getting out pretty soon and yeah we know what that could mean.
Watching these interviews doesn't change my mind at all about the case and you would think that if crucial evidence was left out of the doc (like Kratz claims), then it would be a big "ah-hah" moment and change peoples minds about SA being guilty very quickly.
The DNA under the hood could've been planted - how long did it take them to gather that DNA evidence after the murder date?
The *67 calls prove absolutely nothing. On the surface yea it seems sketchy but how does it prove SA had it out for TH? The people at AutoTrader knew she was going there so it's not like he was trying to go incognito. I mean, he even did a TV interview the day after the murder saying he saw her at his property.
Like most people in this thread agree on, it's super hard to believe that SA and Brendan are these crime scene geniuses that cleaned up every spec of DNA from the trailer (where she was raped/stabbed) and also the garage (where she was shot several times). But yet, they leave DNA all over the car which they never crushed even though they own an auto salvage yard. The car was sitting there for days supposedly....they had more than enough time to clean it up. Also they conveniently left the car key (without TH's DNA) and one bullet (with TH's DNA) around after wiping the place cleaner than Dexter could have.
This new stuff about the jury being tainted and coerced is not surprising at all, but I'll withhold judgement until more info comes out.
I still think the doc was slanted (obviously), but if this is all the old prosecution team can come up with after all this time, it seems like the doc did a decent job of including a more balanced view of the case than you would think.
I think it's entirely possible that Avery did kill her, but it's also extremely obvious that evidence was planted and tampered with to get him arrested and locked up. I feel terrible for Brendan more than anything.
I dont know for sure whether he did or not either. Would i like a new trial yes of course but that would set him free in which we still dont know if he did or not. And a new trial would likely favor his side now that America has seen the doc in which is the opposite of his 1st trial because everyone labeled him as guilty before thetrial basically. I dont expect anything to come of this doc or his case.
I feel bad for Brendan in the sense that i wish he had a better lawyer from the jump who couldve possibly got a clear 1 way statement from him and we'd maybe know what happened and both couldbe free or locked up