- 828
- 27
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2011
lol this is a bit too much thinkin..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by desent
I would say there could be a set period of 5 or 7 years. supposedly i googled this right before i posted and someone in a no name website stated the average marriage is 7 years, and they had the idea of the 5-7 years. i just through that out there to have something to go on, nothing is set in stone but if some movement like this gets started just imagine the possibilities.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Ok another question.
Would each term be a 5-7 year contract? Say I get past the first term (7 years), would my next term be another 7 years? What would you propose?
I think there should be some unity when it comes to contract length if this were to ever be a new system.
[quote]Then what if you have kids with that person, whole new ball game right?
Originally Posted by desent
I would say there could be a set period of 5 or 7 years. supposedly i googled this right before i posted and someone in a no name website stated the average marriage is 7 years, and they had the idea of the 5-7 years. i just through that out there to have something to go on, nothing is set in stone but if some movement like this gets started just imagine the possibilities.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Ok another question.
Would each term be a 5-7 year contract? Say I get past the first term (7 years), would my next term be another 7 years? What would you propose?
I think there should be some unity when it comes to contract length if this were to ever be a new system.
[quote]Then what if you have kids with that person, whole new ball game right?
Originally Posted by Patrick Chewing
Originally Posted by proper english
id be the type to give it my all during contract year.. & say $#%@^ once i get that new contract.
there are incentives, right?
Originally Posted by Patrick Chewing
Originally Posted by proper english
id be the type to give it my all during contract year.. & say $#%@^ once i get that new contract.
there are incentives, right?
Originally Posted by Jking0821
I think its a good idea.
But you best believe in a contract year i will be at the gym every day waiting for free agency. If i resign to the same team that's fine but i don't want to be an aging vet that no team wants
Originally Posted by Jking0821
I think its a good idea.
But you best believe in a contract year i will be at the gym every day waiting for free agency. If i resign to the same team that's fine but i don't want to be an aging vet that no team wants
So what your stating is that it is better that an individual stay in a relationship that may be toxic/unhealthy/ or no longer wanted to appease the kids. I am the product of that, and then the inevitable of divorce is still there, and divorce gets NASTY at least for most people i've seen go through it. Rather than a fair civil way to approach it. The woman is not the victim here it is a mutual understanding from the get go. AND do you really want someone to STAY with you BECAUSE they are OBLIGATED or because they WANT to?Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
Originally Posted by Patrick Chewing
Originally Posted by proper english
id be the type to give it my all during contract year.. & say $#%@^ once i get that new contract.
there are incentives, right?
marriage is def a contract but should not be put in business terms. The most I can see is a prenup if one party has wayyy more money, thats protecting what you earned. But having a expiration date is down right foolish.
Leasing women? Expiration dates on marriage? whats next NT? renting children? a literal wife swap? how many ways can we destroy the moral fabric of family and love?
So what your stating is that it is better that an individual stay in a relationship that may be toxic/unhealthy/ or no longer wanted to appease the kids. I am the product of that, and then the inevitable of divorce is still there, and divorce gets NASTY at least for most people i've seen go through it. Rather than a fair civil way to approach it. The woman is not the victim here it is a mutual understanding from the get go. AND do you really want someone to STAY with you BECAUSE they are OBLIGATED or because they WANT to?Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
Originally Posted by Patrick Chewing
Originally Posted by proper english
id be the type to give it my all during contract year.. & say $#%@^ once i get that new contract.
there are incentives, right?
marriage is def a contract but should not be put in business terms. The most I can see is a prenup if one party has wayyy more money, thats protecting what you earned. But having a expiration date is down right foolish.
Leasing women? Expiration dates on marriage? whats next NT? renting children? a literal wife swap? how many ways can we destroy the moral fabric of family and love?
No if the marriage is bad then get a divorce. Grown *## people shouldn't need an expiration date to choose when to end the marriage. Get married and stay together or get married and get a divorce. It's pretty simple. No need to add all this extra non-sense. But hey I could be wrong. But you still gonna have people that want a divorce before the "expiration date" anyways so whats the point?Originally Posted by desent
So what your stating is that it is better that an individual stay in a relationship that may be toxic/unhealthy/ or no longer wanted to appease the kids. I am the product of that, and then the inevitable of divorce is still there, and divorce gets NASTY at least for most people i've seen go through it. Rather than a fair civil way to approach it. The woman is not the victim here it is a mutual understanding from the get go. AND do you really want someone to STAY with you BECAUSE they are OBLIGATED or because they WANT to?Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
Originally Posted by Patrick Chewing
marriage is def a contract but should not be put in business terms. The most I can see is a prenup if one party has wayyy more money, thats protecting what you earned. But having a expiration date is down right foolish.
Leasing women? Expiration dates on marriage? whats next NT? renting children? a literal wife swap? how many ways can we destroy the moral fabric of family and love?
No if the marriage is bad then get a divorce. Grown *## people shouldn't need an expiration date to choose when to end the marriage. Get married and stay together or get married and get a divorce. It's pretty simple. No need to add all this extra non-sense. But hey I could be wrong. But you still gonna have people that want a divorce before the "expiration date" anyways so whats the point?Originally Posted by desent
So what your stating is that it is better that an individual stay in a relationship that may be toxic/unhealthy/ or no longer wanted to appease the kids. I am the product of that, and then the inevitable of divorce is still there, and divorce gets NASTY at least for most people i've seen go through it. Rather than a fair civil way to approach it. The woman is not the victim here it is a mutual understanding from the get go. AND do you really want someone to STAY with you BECAUSE they are OBLIGATED or because they WANT to?Originally Posted by TruthGetsBusy
Originally Posted by Patrick Chewing
marriage is def a contract but should not be put in business terms. The most I can see is a prenup if one party has wayyy more money, thats protecting what you earned. But having a expiration date is down right foolish.
Leasing women? Expiration dates on marriage? whats next NT? renting children? a literal wife swap? how many ways can we destroy the moral fabric of family and love?
Originally Posted by desent
So what your stating is that it is better that an individual stay in a relationship that may be toxic/unhealthy/ or no longer wanted to appease the kids. I am the product of that, and then the inevitable of divorce is still there, and divorce gets NASTY at least for most people i've seen go through it. Rather than a fair civil way to approach it. The woman is not the victim here it is a mutual understanding from the get go. AND do you really want someone to STAY with you BECAUSE they are OBLIGATED or because they WANT to?
Originally Posted by desent
So what your stating is that it is better that an individual stay in a relationship that may be toxic/unhealthy/ or no longer wanted to appease the kids. I am the product of that, and then the inevitable of divorce is still there, and divorce gets NASTY at least for most people i've seen go through it. Rather than a fair civil way to approach it. The woman is not the victim here it is a mutual understanding from the get go. AND do you really want someone to STAY with you BECAUSE they are OBLIGATED or because they WANT to?
A lot of people seem to be looking at this like men treating women like objects. But this goes both ways.Originally Posted by kickstart
Why get married then?
You're in essence treating your spouse as an object that depreciates in value.
OP, explain how you came to this thinking, please.
A lot of people seem to be looking at this like men treating women like objects. But this goes both ways.Originally Posted by kickstart
Why get married then?
You're in essence treating your spouse as an object that depreciates in value.
OP, explain how you came to this thinking, please.