- Jan 22, 2010
- 24,289
- 19,558
Ban all guns, zero problem with a gun less world
Totally doable
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ban all guns, zero problem with a gun less world
I honestly don't have the answer.
i'm just tired of hearing them say oh well the republicans aren't cooperating.
their job is to create solutions with the rupeublicans enough of using them as a copout this is an epidemic of terror and it needs to be addressed and they need to do whatever it takes to create a solution, both parties need to come together
Really scary and bad when it’s a mass shooting
Even more terrifying when it’s children.
Really wish these suicidal depressed wierdos would just off themselves before hurting innocent people
It’s barbaricAmericans are simply far too obsessed with violence. It really is over.
There is literally no reason to have weapons that can cause this much damage within a developed society.
If your stance is that people are the issue, not guns then...you can address the psychological issues of people within society without having weapons that can cause this many fatalities in such a short amount of time. If you're afraid of someone robbing you or harming you, then again it's people being the issue not guns so what are we doing having these kinds of weapons in circulation?
What is the actual point of guns? How many people percentage wise, actually use the gun that they have "for protection purposes?" What do you gain from having a weapon that harmful?
The funny thing is the black market would have been a greater barrier to entry than what this 18 year old kid did.There is no "banning" these weapons man, all it does is make them even more readily available on the black market. there is entirely too much money to be made illegally, your never ridding this country of guns or people with bad intensions.
All your doing is emboldening criminals who already DGAF about the laws to feel safer attacking civilians with no threat of recourse.
I agree that there should be background checks & stricter guidelines, who creates & delivers the Okay tho? who's allowed to make the decisions on who's fit to have a gun or not?
Does nobody see that we complain about discrimination & corruption in EVERY SINGLE FACET OF AMERICAN SOCIETY............. and ya'll want to create another system, that would allow that same dynamic........ to determine who can & can't protect themselves.
It’s barbaric
The funny thing is the black market would have been a greater barrier to entry than what this 18 year old kid did.
He LEGALLY purchased this **** before he was old enough to buy a beer.
Some nerdy *** weirdo not gonna hit up some underground black market dudes for an assault rifle. They would probably just rob his ***.
Think back to when weed was illegal illegal and who had access back then.
Certain people are issue. Plenty of of responsible gun owners and they probably outnumber the irresponsible ones, but we don't deserve "nice things" with the amount of gun violence that exists in this country. It's an epidemic.
There's a reason other countries are capable of having armed citizens and high gun ownership with virtually no issues. Their citizens aren't trash.
This country is just a perfect storm of f***kery that facilitates gun violence. Blame guns, blame mental health, blame poverty, blame whatever. But all these elements shouldn't be combined so willingly...cause look what happens when you mix them.
Let me clarifyYeah I mean I obviously don't think we can ban all guns right? It's over in that regard.
I'm simply saying that there's no reason for guns to exist, They do nothing but cause massive harm. In a hypothetical world, we'd immediately take action on banning them at some point. Yes bad people would still get them, yes people still would die at the hands of guns. But that doesn't mean you don't try, and the people that would die at the hands of gun violence would be a lot less and getting a gun would be a hell of a lot harder if they were banned.
The funny thing is the black market would have been a greater barrier to entry than what this 18 year old kid did.
He LEGALLY purchased this **** before he was old enough to buy a beer.
Some nerdy *** weirdo not gonna hit up some underground black market dudes for an assault rifle. They would probably just rob his ***.
Think back to when weed was illegal illegal and who had access back then.
Bro your thinking about this with a rational brain, We are talking about people who plan these things out for months/years.... there have been reports of other shooters scouting the areas they attacked, doing research, traveling countless hrs etc etc.
These aren't occasions where people wake up one morning & decide to just kill a school. These are cold calculated plans, setting aside a background check isn't going to deter someone from ultimately carrying out their plans
And again we are in a country where clear bias & prejudice exist, Background checks are often left at the discretion of various people.... who's to say that this loser doesn't pass the "inspection" based off bias
Idk what that page is or what they post, just sharing something that somebody reposted. (Also not targeting you.)
I’m not saying lock up minorities. I’m asking what is there to do if California already has really strict gun laws, but the streets are as hot as ever. Are the criminals obtaining their guns “legally?” And if caught, the repercussions are minor, why wouldn’t it just continue to happen?
Anything helps.
Just because thorough background checks wouldn't 100% work, they should still be implemented. Japan has thorough background checks, their mass shooting rate isn't 0 but it's a hell of a lot closer to 0 than the U.S.'s is.
Not taking action because it wouldn't 100% work is not the wave.
same way they do with drugs or preventing weapons at various venues of society
you catch someone with a gun, you take it
metal detector goes off, you aint getting it back and get a ticket with a fine for possession
if you decide it‘s worth the risk of some absurd sentence to have a gun or go certain places with a gun, that’s on you
if cigarettes can be banned from most indoor places because we all get the risk, I don’t see the problem with treating guns in a similar manner
beyond the NRA conference trump is going be speaking at
I just wonder where do we go from here. If the sight of kids being senselessly murdered doesn't move those in the republican party to take action, then what will? How do you strike fear into those who have no moral compass?