- 7,309
- 3,922
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2004
Are the midsoles glossy like recent retros??
cosign on the elephant print
cosign on the elephant print
MN WORLD PREMIER: Air Jordan III White/Cement Grey-Fire Red 2011 Via Modern Notoriety *UPDATED*
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by wreckinkickz,
- Start date
- 1,056
- 100
- Joined
- May 3, 2007
copped!
- 1,056
- 100
- Joined
- May 3, 2007
copped!
- 15,762
- 517
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Elephant print looks disgusting as hell.
- 15,762
- 517
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Elephant print looks disgusting as hell.
- 19,637
- 12,651
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
I'll take 1 pair
- 19,637
- 12,651
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
I'll take 1 pair
- 17,790
- 834
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2008
Paint chipping midsoles! Perfect way to spend $150 on!
- 17,790
- 834
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2008
Paint chipping midsoles! Perfect way to spend $150 on!
- 529
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
more pics please...ive been waiting for thses since i missed out in hs
- 529
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
more pics please...ive been waiting for thses since i missed out in hs
- 2,053
- 57
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2005
need these instant copped
- 2,053
- 57
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2005
need these instant copped
- 1,305
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2007
They even took the time to tag it.
- 1,305
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2007
They even took the time to tag it.
- 9,609
- 6,364
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
^^ nice mustang in your sig... my brother and I are fixing up ours as we speak! 92 5.0
back on topic...
WE NEED PICS!
back on topic...
WE NEED PICS!
- 9,609
- 6,364
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
^^ nice mustang in your sig... my brother and I are fixing up ours as we speak! 92 5.0
back on topic...
WE NEED PICS!
back on topic...
WE NEED PICS!
- 1,796
- 210
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
Disagree. This makes the 2003 value drop dramatically. Just like CG XI's. Why spend 400 for 03s that most sellers will tell you you cannot even wear, when u can get 3 pairs of these that you can definitely wear.
- 1,796
- 210
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
Disagree. This makes the 2003 value drop dramatically. Just like CG XI's. Why spend 400 for 03s that most sellers will tell you you cannot even wear, when u can get 3 pairs of these that you can definitely wear.
- 9,358
- 11,499
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
truth.com
the prices on white/cements has already started to decrease in value. on the marketplace, average price is $175-$200, and thats for a VNDS-DS pair.
about the 2011 IIIs, looks like they used a non gloss paint, which is great. however, leather looks the same as the CDP IIIs. cant comment about the elephant print because it varies from shoe to shoe (usually the earlier produced pairs has thicker elephant print lines than the ones made later in the production cycle)
- 9,358
- 11,499
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
truth.com
the prices on white/cements has already started to decrease in value. on the marketplace, average price is $175-$200, and thats for a VNDS-DS pair.
about the 2011 IIIs, looks like they used a non gloss paint, which is great. however, leather looks the same as the CDP IIIs. cant comment about the elephant print because it varies from shoe to shoe (usually the earlier produced pairs has thicker elephant print lines than the ones made later in the production cycle)
- 8,059
- 5,260
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
this will be my first jordan 3 cop, they look super clean
- 8,059
- 5,260
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
this will be my first jordan 3 cop, they look super clean
- 3,436
- 494
- Joined
- Dec 14, 1999
About the cement print....
I've said this a million times, but cement print on J's (ESPECIALLY the 2003's III's) are very inconsistent as far as thickness of the lines. When the white/cements came out in 2003 I ended up with 6 pairs. All of which had different elephant print boldness. I'm assuming it'll be the same with these new ones.
Think of it like this: You have multiple sheets of material which gets stamped by a huge elephant print stamp. The stamps on top or closer to the stamp probably get the thicker looking print while the bottom layer sheets get the lighter print.
I've said this a million times, but cement print on J's (ESPECIALLY the 2003's III's) are very inconsistent as far as thickness of the lines. When the white/cements came out in 2003 I ended up with 6 pairs. All of which had different elephant print boldness. I'm assuming it'll be the same with these new ones.
Think of it like this: You have multiple sheets of material which gets stamped by a huge elephant print stamp. The stamps on top or closer to the stamp probably get the thicker looking print while the bottom layer sheets get the lighter print.
- 3,436
- 494
- Joined
- Dec 14, 1999
About the cement print....
I've said this a million times, but cement print on J's (ESPECIALLY the 2003's III's) are very inconsistent as far as thickness of the lines. When the white/cements came out in 2003 I ended up with 6 pairs. All of which had different elephant print boldness. I'm assuming it'll be the same with these new ones.
Think of it like this: You have multiple sheets of material which gets stamped by a huge elephant print stamp. The stamps on top or closer to the stamp probably get the thicker looking print while the bottom layer sheets get the lighter print.
I've said this a million times, but cement print on J's (ESPECIALLY the 2003's III's) are very inconsistent as far as thickness of the lines. When the white/cements came out in 2003 I ended up with 6 pairs. All of which had different elephant print boldness. I'm assuming it'll be the same with these new ones.
Think of it like this: You have multiple sheets of material which gets stamped by a huge elephant print stamp. The stamps on top or closer to the stamp probably get the thicker looking print while the bottom layer sheets get the lighter print.