- 27,294
- 15,000
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2011
Gotdamn gotdamn. That “read more”...
... I wasn’t ready for all that text
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Link to the satelliteThey deny it like MF lmao
——————
I’m still waiting on actual images of Earth btw.
Link to the satellite
https://www.noaa.gov/satellites
Article
https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-one-photograph-entire-earth-three-years-ago/amp
Too many resources out here to be ignorant. I know you can’t believe it but we really out here doing things man. Keep up
I know you’re a youtube guy. Here ya go
In all honesty , dont bring up Holocaust denials in here because that takes away from the fact that the moon landings were seemingly fake. If so, that in itself is a conspiracy by definition.
We have not had any real proof of space travel for over 40 years. Everything is in HD 4K now yet we cant get a satellite to sit about 10,000 miles away and take 24 hour footage of the earth in its wonderful glory.... look at that space X debacle that happened earlier this year, it looked fake as ****... EVEN ELON MUSK SAID IT LOOKED FAKE so it has to be real... are we living and breathing the same air because the things people pass off as truth is clearly not when you apply simple logical reasoning.
dont miss the irony here that you would be going this hard in the opposite direction if Trump goes on CNN right now with a manilla folder or some **** telling u that **** was almighty cap
So aside from going to the moon being real or not...and aside from NASA only getting 0.5% of the total federal budget...i think we should skip the moon and focus on propulsion to get us to deeper space. I don't know how efficient it is to use the moon as a jumping off point to get to Mars. Might seem like money better spent to just focus on getting directly to Mars. Seems like a lot of off-shoots/benefits from making bigger rockets with more efficient propulsion methods would have a better rate of return.
What point is dude making exactly that you can't ignore.
I do think we went to the moon but I'm not gonna ignore this point
What point is dude making exactly that you can't ignore.
If you think I just align my views to be opposite of Trump's, and compromise my beleifs in doing so, please point out previous examples.
Lol did you not read the top of the article you linked? It said we only had 1 image of Earth until 3 years ago.
Still fake.
Believe what you want though. Post the pictures I don’t want links anymore.
Go to Germany and ask if it happened lmao. They deny it.
Famb, holocaust denial is a crime in Germany
There you go Rusty. End of discussion....They deny it like MF lmao
1st all them launches dont even go st8 up they look like this........... , not sure where you think thats going but ok......You never seen footage of a launch in Cape Canaveral? I guess they're using special effects for those people seeing it in Florida. There's a 24-hour footage of Space on youtube, FYI.
Son, you telling me all the times they went to the moon, MARS , PLUTO, JUPITER, the sun etc for the past 30 years... they never ever ever ever thought about taking a photo of the earth when 30,000 miles or so away??? nah???Why don’t you continue and read the whole article. Yes, 3 years ago..... which means that we finally have more than one. Was that not what you were asking for. Proof? I’ve presented it to you. An easy to read article and a government website with the satellites details. Last but not least a youtube video for the reading impaired. It’s your choice if you want to believe it or not. These are FACTS whether you like it or not.
So aside from going to the moon being real or not...and aside from NASA only getting 0.5% of the total federal budget...i think we should skip the moon and focus on propulsion to get us to deeper space. I don't know how efficient it is to use the moon as a jumping off point to get to Mars. Might seem like money better spent to just focus on getting directly to Mars. Seems like a lot of off-shoots/benefits from making bigger rockets with more efficient propulsion methods would have a better rate of return.
sharpshooter718 was Apollo 1 and the Challenger mission fake?
KinfolkI’ve never seen Larry bird play in person so to me it could be one elaborate ploy by the white man to stay hip. STAY WOKE #nextlevelwoke
Neil Degrass Tyson said for us to stop looking at the announcement of one project as the neglect/absence of other projects.So aside from going to the moon being real or not...and aside from NASA only getting 0.5% of the total federal budget...i think we should skip the moon and focus on propulsion to get us to deeper space. I don't know how efficient it is to use the moon as a jumping off point to get to Mars. Might seem like money better spent to just focus on getting directly to Mars. Seems like a lot of off-shoots/benefits from making bigger rockets with more efficient propulsion methods would have a better rate of return.
But that's the thing. You keep asking for pics of earth and no matter what pic is used you will dismiss as fake.In all honesty , dont bring up Holocaust denials in here because that takes away from the fact that the moon landings were seemingly fake. If so, that in itself is a conspiracy by definition.
We have not had any real proof of space travel for over 40 years. Everything is in HD 4K now yet we cant get a satellite to sit about 10,000 miles away and take 24 hour footage of the earth in its wonderful glory.... look at that space X debacle that happened earlier this year, it looked fake as ****... EVEN ELON MUSK SAID IT LOOKED FAKE so it has to be real... are we living and breathing the same air because the things people pass off as truth is clearly not when you apply simple logical reasoning.