- 43,425
- 42,998
You read those group chats in context?
NBC employee claims Bill Cosby paid off women, invited young models to dressing room.
- 36,507
- 38,492
Thats why you shouldn't be wearing grey sweats in public.
- 12,448
- 34,920
ok.
- 87,865
- 50,387
- 3,600
- 3,370
I’m tired of the cancel police in society
- 36,507
- 38,492
Good to know. Im out in the streets with my cameraI’m tired of the cancel police in society
Hijo Del Promo
formerly xxhu5sl1npnoyxx
- 9,841
- 7,081
I’m tired of the cancel police in society
No youre not, youre tired your post dont get the reactions youd like.
- 64,964
- 196,091
Nope!
" Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties."
Slippery slope.
Don't start that "consent" stuff.
We have no expectation of privacy in public.
Next thing we know cops are gonna be all over this...confiscating footage hollering about "consent".
If Stopped for Photographing in Public
Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties.Unfortunately, law enforcement officers...www.acludc.org
- 31,417
- 65,440
ahat
clearly posted them. No need to be indirect. We're all on public forum w/ our sn's on full display.it's not the same thing & u know it isn't. there's difference b/t doing this:
and posting this:
look at me finding any reason to post draya.
- 28,531
- 54,105
Nope!
" Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties."
Slippery slope.
Don't start that "consent" stuff.
We have no expectation of privacy in public.
Next thing we know cops are gonna be all over this...confiscating footage hollering about "consent".
If Stopped for Photographing in Public
Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties.Unfortunately, law enforcement officers...
So is this the same as Cosby situation? Legal at the time vs morals?
Because the law says it okay to film and take pictures vs morals (perverted/weirdos).
But, on the real, there’s a difference then snapping pics of people on the streets to add to a fashion blog vs having your camera upside down, zooming on some random girl butt or recording a video under their skirts.
- 47,251
- 96,796
it's not the same thing & u know it isn't. there's difference b/t doing this:
and posting this:
look at me finding any reason to post draya.
Imagine caring what TimidTebow thinks
- 42,283
- 44,139
it's not the same thing & u know it isn't. there's difference b/t doing this:
and posting this:
look at me finding any reason to post draya.
You know damn well we wasn’t posting IG years ago…maybe you don’t. But, yea before IG it was just rando pics, some candid some not.
- 60,034
- 50,947
Nah, this is what we’re not gonna do. I took a video of a girl in jeans, in public. I have never and would never take a pic under a girls skirt. In my book, that’s some creepy sicko ****.
Taking a pic of a full clothed fat *** in public is the same as me taking a pic of a man in a Fubu jersey in 2021 or wearing some terrible fakes. It’s out in public, not private. So don’t try to mix the two.
ahat
delete that message, you telling
elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,008
- 194,454
I was thinking that was Timid but wasn't sure
- 28,531
- 54,105
Nah, this is what we’re not gonna do. I took a video of a girl in jeans, in public. I have never and would never take a pic under a girls skirt. In my book, that’s some creepy sicko ****.
Taking a pic of a full clothed fat *** in public is the same as me taking a pic of a man in a Fubu jersey in 2021 or wearing some terrible fakes. It’s out in public, not private. So don’t try to mix the two.
I’m was not saying you recorded under some random woman skirt. Let me be clear.
But to take video/recoding of a random woman *** on the low is cool?
Y’all some wild boys.
- 31,417
- 65,440
Well, okay. Understood.
Yeah that was b4 me. Not my bag.
How are y'all figuring this out so last?I was thinking that was Timid but wasn't sure
- 9,531
- 20,428
I was thinking that was Timid but wasn't sure
Good to know
- 17,811
- 43,325
elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,008
- 194,454
- 31,417
- 65,440
- 12,448
- 34,920
Me reading through this thread:
- 35,042
- 47,135
Ok let's think this out logically.
What does "consent" to take pics in public look like? Is it a form?
Are there laws in place already that cover voyeurism?
Do you feel voyeurs will ask for consent...making it ok? Excuse me Ms. Would you mind if I take pics of your butt? No? Great! Please sign my form.
Will this consent requirement apply to only women?
Hyperbole and extremes.
If people don't know the difference between public photography and voyeurism - is that my fault?
I don't believe in giving government more power just because it feels good at the time.
There's nothing wrong with pointing out the difference between facts and feelings.
- 26,522
- 29,726
Cats are saying one thing on here, but doing another in real life. Text threads getting brought up. This thread is wild . People on the same side one page, then going back and forth with one another on the next.
. People on the same side one page, then going back and forth with one another on the next. 
