- 1,075
- 43
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2008
The engagement ring is the big flashy ring, and the wedding band is a simple gold band, just like the mens ring
I think.
I think.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Pretty much. The engagement ring usually has the diamond while the wedding band is usually a simple ring for everyday wear.Originally Posted by jmb1523
The engagement ring is the big flashy ring, and the wedding band is a simple gold band, just like the mens ring
I think.
Originally Posted by ElderWatsonDiggs
DC, no wedding watch, just the watch and getting a Tungsten Carbide wedding band...they are tough and scratch resistant and doesn't cost much.
Finnns, we are going to have a low key wedding, we are more interested in the actual marriage than the wedding itself, plus we are in the DC area (very expensive to live) so we will save the wedding money and use it for a house in a year or so. I'm getting her a 1ct near colorless, Very slight inclusion VS1, ideal cut round diamond in an invisible platinum setting. I was gonna go for 1.5 ct, but aint paying an extra 5k for that. I'm not a baller
Getting the engagement ring is more important than the wedding day to a lot of women.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I have never asked a close friend or family member this question. Yea I am talking about the woman's ring. The engagement ring essentially is a base for the wedding ring right?Originally Posted by DaJoka004
We're talking about a woman's engagement ring right? Because you have got to #!@*. I'd be shocked if you told me you've ever had a close friend or family member get engaged.
I know it is all about them but I really hate the social conditioning that has turned women (men to a lesser degree) to these materialistic creatures. I will have a hard time of being "cooperative" during that time, if it ever comes in my life. Can't see myself spending "money" on two damn rings. A wedding, etc. I just don't like throwing my $ away. All of that stuff wouldn't matter to me honestly. Could give a damn about it all. I don't care how deeply in love I am.Originally Posted by DaJoka004
Getting the engagement ring is more important than the wedding day to a lot of women.
Wedding bands are fairly cheap though.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I know it is all about them but I really hate the social conditioning that has turned women (men to a lesser degree) to these materialistic creatures. I will have a hard time of being "cooperative" during that time, if it ever comes in my life. Can't see myself spending "money" on two damn rings. A wedding, etc. I just don't like throwing my $ away. All of that stuff wouldn't matter to me honestly. Could give a damn about it all. I don't care how deeply in love I am.Originally Posted by DaJoka004
Getting the engagement ring is more important than the wedding day to a lot of women.
Originally Posted by DaJoka004
Wedding bands are fairly cheap though.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I know it is all about them but I really hate the social conditioning that has turned women (men to a lesser degree) to these materialistic creatures. I will have a hard time of being "cooperative" during that time, if it ever comes in my life. Can't see myself spending "money" on two damn rings. A wedding, etc. I just don't like throwing my $ away. All of that stuff wouldn't matter to me honestly. Could give a damn about it all. I don't care how deeply in love I am.Originally Posted by DaJoka004
Getting the engagement ring is more important than the wedding day to a lot of women.
But let me tell you something. I was dating a girl a few months back. She was a smokestack. Fake DD *******. Amazing %#%. At least a 7/10 in the face. Sent me naked pictures of herself while I was at work. It was Heaven man. Broke up with her one month later. Why? The topic of engagement rings came up. She said the rule was 4 months salary. 4 MONTHS. A third of my yearly salary. First, I'm not going to play by some stupid rule the jewelers floated out there way back when to get people to spend more money on rings. Second, if I'm making $250k+ by time I'm an attending (which is entirely reasonable), I'm not spending $85k on a ring. It's ridiculous. I told her she wouldn't know how much the ring cost anyways. Her comment? "I'd get it appraised and give it back to you if it wasn't worth what it should be." No lie.
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I am with you man. A bunch of pointless money spending to me. And probably by people that still live in a damn apartment. Whoever convinced the world that those rings are a sign of love is banking forever. Foolishness. Yea, do people ever look at engagement rings after it is all said and done?Originally Posted by yngSIMBA
Engagement rings seem like a waste to me, either that or I just don't get it. You buy an engagement ring, then go buy another wedding ring?? What's the point, do they still wear the engagement ring when married? Dumb question, but help me out
Originally Posted by joeykadesh
It sounds cool, but a ring has much more meaning, I don't think a watch can capture that.
Originally Posted by CDUNK
Okay, so how would someone else be able to tell that it's an engagement watch?
Originally Posted by humpasaurus rex
Curious as to how you feel about marriage? I just see it as a legal construct, am I shallow?
DCAllAmerican wrote:
Originally Posted by CDUNK
Okay, so how would someone else be able to tell that it's an engagement watch?
Why should that matter? Or do you feel that is the point of it all? I agree with you though, how would anyone know it is an engagement watch? If nobody can tell what it is then it is pointless.
The groom will know it's an engagement watch, and it will come out in conversation.
Person: "Oh, that's a nice watch?"
Groom: "Thanks, my wife gave it to me as an engagement gift"
I know this conversation will never take place with DC, because I don't think he physically talks to people
You can clearly tell who is single and who has never been in a serious relationship. Some times people need to accept that it isn't all about themselves. An engagement may not mean anything to you, but if it is a symbol for her, why are should there be any qualmes about it. The rules are silly, and pushed by jewelers, but that isn't an excuse to dismiss the symbolism of the ring completely.
Dude said a watch is "trivial". If you really want to, you can make anything "trivial".
Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo
You can clearly tell who is single and who has never been in a serious relationship. Some times people need to accept that it isn't all about themselves. An engagement may not mean anything to you, but if it is a symbol for her, why are should there be any qualmes about it. The rules are silly, and pushed by jewelers, but that isn't an excuse to dismiss the symbolism of the ring completely.
Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo
It kind of does make your opinion invalid, and I don't mean it as an insult.
It's easy to say, "Yeah, I don't get what's the point of an engagement ring, blah blah blah, it's pointless, blah blah" When you've never really been serious with a female. On a deep level, on a "I want to do whatever it takes to make this girl/woman happy because I love her" level. I'm not talking a "Get together first period, break up at lunch" girlfriend either.
Even if this girl you care about so deeply never says that she cares about the value of a ring, she will want a ring, and you will go out and try to find the best possible ring you can find. The rules, like the "3 month salary" rule is ridiculous. There really shouldn't be any rules, but I bet you won't go out and buy a cheap ring.