jpzx
Supporter
- 58,445
- 27,881
Saw Clay Matthews guaranteed AP wouldn't rush for 200 yards.
That's the equivalent of Paul Pierce guaranteeing LeBron won't drop 55 on them in a random game in a playoff series. CONGRATS.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2000 yard club
attempts / yards / tds / yards per attempt / yards per game
eric dickerson
no mvp
379 2105 14 66 5.6 131.6
no superbowl
adrian peterson
mvp: to be determined
348 2097 12 82 6.0 131.1
superbowl: to be determined
jamal lewis
no mvp
387 2066 14 82 5.3 129.1
no superbowl
barry sanders
mvp
335 2053 11 82 6.1 128.3
no superbowl
terrell davis
mvp
392 2008 21 70 5.1 125.5
superbowl
chris johnson
no mvp
358 2006 14 91 5.6 125.4
no superbowl
oj simpson
mvp
332 2003 12 80 6.0 143.1
no superbowl
ap has had a great season but unless he wins the mvp (unlikely) and superbowl (unlikely), terrell davis has had the best season for the 2000 yard club.
No AP2H
Saw Clay Matthews guaranteed AP wouldn't rush for 200 yards.
That's the equivalent of Paul Pierce guaranteeing LeBron won't drop 55 on them in a random game in a playoff series. CONGRATS.
London Fletcher has had a very good career and his starting streak is great in itself. However, make no mistake champ, the only way London Fletcher gets in the hall of fame is if he purchases a ticket like everyone else during normal business hours. Maybe they'll give him a discount since he'll be a former NFL player but that will be about it.Posted this in the Draft thread by accident:
I took these stats from another site. However, I'd love to get folks' opinion on this? On the heels of Ray Lewis' retirement, where do you all think London Fletcher stacks up? Is he HOF worthy?
Look at the #'s
VERY similar.Ray Lewis (RL) vs. London Fletcher (LF)
Years Played - RL: 17 ... LF: 15
Combined Tackles - RL: 1,336 ... LF: 1,685
Total Tackles - RL: 972 ... LF: 1,134
Assists - RL: 364 ... LF: 551
Sacks - RL: 41.5 ... LF: 37
Pass Def - RL: 67 ... LF: 73
INT - RL: 31 ... LF: 23
TD's - RL: 3 ... LF: 2
Forced Fumbles - RL: 17 ... LF: 18
Super Bowl Rings - RL: 1 ... LF: 1
Posted this in the Draft thread by accident:
I took these stats from another site. However, I'd love to get folks' opinion on this? On the heels of Ray Lewis' retirement, where do you all think London Fletcher stacks up? Is he HOF worthy?
Look at the #'s
Ray Lewis (RL) vs. London Fletcher (LF)
Years Played - RL: 17 ... LF: 15
Combined Tackles - RL: 1,336 ... LF: 1,685
Total Tackles - RL: 972 ... LF: 1,134
Assists - RL: 364 ... LF: 551
Sacks - RL: 41.5 ... LF: 37
Pass Def - RL: 67 ... LF: 73
INT - RL: 31 ... LF: 23
TD's - RL: 3 ... LF: 2
Forced Fumbles - RL: 17 ... LF: 18
Super Bowl Rings - RL: 1 ... LF: 1
VERY similar.
London Fletcher may have similar or even better numbers in certain areas compared to Ray Lewis, but that's not going to cut it for London Fletcher. At no point in time was London Fletcher ever a Super Bowl MVP, defensive player of the year, leading member of a Top 5 defense in any year, and doesn't even have the pro-bowl selections to back up his resume like Ray does, that's says it all. Not to mention, when Ray Lewis announced his retirement it was breaking news in the sports media and everyone was buzzing about it, when London Fletcher retires it will be business as usual without anybody or anything skipping a beat and rightfully so.
I like London Fletcher and he has alot to be proud of as far as his NFL career is concerned. However, the only comparison that can be made with London Fletcher and Ray Lewis is that they both are black, and play the inside linebacker position in the NFL, and that's about it. Ray Lewis is a legend while London Fletcher is not and nowhere close to being one.
It ain't just about the numbers or pro bowl selections champ, although that does help build the case, that's what alot of you dudes are failing to realize. It's also about impact to the game and other factors. As of right now at this very moment, nobody........or hardly anybody for that matter cares about London Fletcher. If hardly anybody cares about London Fletcher NOW what makes you dudes think folks will care about him later on down the line when as a former NFL player he'll be even eligible for the HOF.i don't know how any rational minded person could look at the statistics posted above and make that statement. more tackles in less years played, but because he doesn't have pro-bowl selections he's not hall of fame worthy?London Fletcher may have similar or even better numbers in certain areas compared to Ray Lewis, but that's not going to cut it for London Fletcher. At no point in time was London Fletcher ever a Super Bowl MVP, defensive player of the year, leading member of a Top 5 defense in any year, and doesn't even have the pro-bowl selections to back up his resume like Ray does, that's says it all. Not to mention, when Ray Lewis announced his retirement it was breaking news in the sports media and everyone was buzzing about it, when London Fletcher retires it will be business as usual without anybody or anything skipping a beat and rightfully so.Posted this in the Draft thread by accident:
I took these stats from another site. However, I'd love to get folks' opinion on this? On the heels of Ray Lewis' retirement, where do you all think London Fletcher stacks up? Is he HOF worthy?
Look at the #'sRay Lewis (RL) vs. London Fletcher (LF)
Years Played - RL: 17 ... LF: 15
Combined Tackles - RL: 1,336 ... LF: 1,685
Total Tackles - RL: 972 ... LF: 1,134
Assists - RL: 364 ... LF: 551
Sacks - RL: 41.5 ... LF: 37
Pass Def - RL: 67 ... LF: 73
INT - RL: 31 ... LF: 23
TD's - RL: 3 ... LF: 2
Forced Fumbles - RL: 17 ... LF: 18
Super Bowl Rings - RL: 1 ... LF: 1
VERY similar.
I like London Fletcher and he has alot to be proud of as far as his NFL career is concerned. However, the only comparison that can be made with London Fletcher and Ray Lewis is that they both are black, and play the inside linebacker position in the NFL, and that's about it. Ray Lewis is a legend while London Fletcher is not and nowhere close to being one.
He had the best QB of the bunch by far so it makes sense he had the best season from a team perspective.
I agree that this is how the HOF should be but the problem is there are already many 'iffy' inductions so hard to now take a 'firm stand' when players waiting are more deserving than some that are inAlso, another reason why I feel the way I do about HOF players if that if your name is brought up in conversation for the HOF as a player it should be a no-brainer or folks. People really shouldn't have to go "back and forth" if your name is mentioned. Meaning if your not a 1st ballot HOF selectee unless the ballot for that particular year is just that loaded with other worthy HOF players and you don't get in because they only allow a certain number of players each year then your not truly a HOF candidate. That's just from my viewpoint.
It's hard to argue against Londong though, because those starts are amazing.
2000 yard club
attempts / yards / tds / yards per attempt / yards per game
eric dickerson
no mvp
379 2105 14 66 5.6 131.6
no superbowl
adrian peterson
mvp: to be determined
348 2097 12 82 6.0 131.1
superbowl: to be determined
jamal lewis
no mvp
387 2066 14 82 5.3 129.1
no superbowl
barry sanders
mvp
335 2053 11 82 6.1 128.3
no superbowl
terrell davis
mvp
392 2008 21 70 5.1 125.5
superbowl
chris johnson
no mvp
358 2006 14 91 5.6 125.4
no superbowl
oj simpson
mvp
332 2003 12 80 6.0 143.1
no superbowl
ap has had a great season but unless he wins the mvp (unlikely) and superbowl (unlikely), terrell davis has had the best season for the 2000 yard club.
It's hard to argue against Londong though, because those starts are amazing.