- 439
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2005
Just ordered the Alpha Vapor Ones for $84 shipped.... Wanted em but my team isn't getting em, doubt I can wear em in the game so they'll be a nice practice cleat to have
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Product number: 472602 -010Originally Posted by Mister Friendly
![]()
Yeah they look nice. Since they are 85 dollars, I would assume they have same feel and technology as the Alpha Vapor One and Speed TDs. But I don't understand why Jordan keeps BSing with releases like this and Jordan JAQ? When they know people really want Jordan retroes with a TD bottom
Originally Posted by Zero 0123
Product number: 472602 -010Originally Posted by Mister Friendly
![]()
Yeah they look nice. Since they are 85 dollars, I would assume they have same feel and technology as the Alpha Vapor One and Speed TDs. But I don't understand why Jordan keeps BSing with releases like this and Jordan JAQ? When they know people really want Jordan retroes with a TD bottom
No RD, Nike has no clue when these will release. I'm very intrigued with these. Was going to pickup a pair of the Alpha Vapor Ones, but I'd much rather these...
I wonder if they've hit local retail stores or anywhere else. I guess the hunt is on...
Originally Posted by ATLfootballer
Originally Posted by Caerus
Originally Posted by 03silverbullet
so both are wearing home colored jersey's for this game? i doubt it. it would be nice to see them both rocking their colors like USC and UCLA use to.
Boise & VTech both wore colered jerseys last year when they played against eachother.
No Boise State wore grey jerseys which is considered an away color... And those are Boise's uni's from their bowl game so I doubt they would make em their pro combat for this year... So look for Boise to be wearing an away color unless they wanna take a 15 yrd penalty at the beginning of the game
Originally Posted by jeffgdula
Originally Posted by ATLfootballer
Originally Posted by Caerus
Boise & VTech both wore colered jerseys last year when they played against eachother.
No Boise State wore grey jerseys which is considered an away color... And those are Boise's uni's from their bowl game so I doubt they would make em their pro combat for this year... So look for Boise to be wearing an away color unless they wanna take a 15 yrd penalty at the beginning of the game
Both teams can wear their home uniforms now.
![]()
I fully expect to see Boise in blue, based on what we have heard thusfar.
Originally Posted by Baydestrian408
^ Boise and Oregon, not Georgia. Talking bout the game tomorrow.
There was a rule change and I believe the penalty is losing a timeout, not 15 yards. As far as to why they would do it: the same reason UGA is going to wear those clown suits.Originally Posted by ATLfootballer
Originally Posted by jeffgdula
Originally Posted by ATLfootballer
No Boise State wore grey jerseys which is considered an away color... And those are Boise's uni's from their bowl game so I doubt they would make em their pro combat for this year... So look for Boise to be wearing an away color unless they wanna take a 15 yrd penalty at the beginning of the game
Both teams can wear their home uniforms now.
![]()
I fully expect to see Boise in blue, based on what we have heard thusfar.
Both teams can wear home jerseys only if the home team agrees before hand, which is what SC and UCLA do now to go back on tradition, if not then the away team takes a 15 yrd penalty..... For what reason would Boise and UGA both wear home?? Because Nike asked them to?
I think both teams came to a agreement cause its a special gameOriginally Posted by jeffgdula
There was a rule change and I believe the penalty is losing a timeout, not 15 yards. As far as to why they would do it: the same reason UGA is going to wear those clown suits.Originally Posted by ATLfootballer
Originally Posted by jeffgdula
Both teams can wear their home uniforms now.
![]()
I fully expect to see Boise in blue, based on what we have heard thusfar.
Both teams can wear home jerseys only if the home team agrees before hand, which is what SC and UCLA do now to go back on tradition, if not then the away team takes a 15 yrd penalty..... For what reason would Boise and UGA both wear home?? Because Nike asked them to?
Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
I think both teams came to a agreement cause its a special gameOriginally Posted by jeffgdula
There was a rule change and I believe the penalty is losing a timeout, not 15 yards. As far as to why they would do it: the same reason UGA is going to wear those clown suits.Originally Posted by ATLfootballer
Both teams can wear home jerseys only if the home team agrees before hand, which is what SC and UCLA do now to go back on tradition, if not then the away team takes a 15 yrd penalty..... For what reason would Boise and UGA both wear home?? Because Nike asked them to?
Mark Richt stated that Georgia is all about tradition but since this was a special game at a special location they agreed with Nike to switch it up just for 1 game
I kinda got the vibe both teams are on the same bage to make this like a bowl game.......so I think it will be Red vs Blue game
If you look at the advertisements you see Georgia is telling all there fans to wear RED and Boise St is telling all there fans to wear BLUE
Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
you confusing my manOriginally Posted by jeffgdula
Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
I think both teams came to a agreement cause its a special game
Mark Richt stated that Georgia is all about tradition but since this was a special game at a special location they agreed with Nike to switch it up just for 1 game
I kinda got the vibe both teams are on the same bage to make this like a bowl game.......so I think it will be Red vs Blue game
If you look at the advertisements you see Georgia is telling all there fans to wear RED and Boise St is telling all there fans to wear BLUE
I didn't realize two teams could get together and agree to change NCAA rules. Oh wait, they can't. UCLA's coach agreed to call a timeout at the start of the game to equalize the removal of 1 of USC's timeouts.
I will be surprised if Boise is not in blue.
![]()
UCLA's coach agreed to call a timeout at the start of the game to equalize the removal of 1 of USC's timeouts.
I think both teams came to a agreement cause its a special game
Meaning the coaches would do the little timeout thing to even it out
You implied that is it was the agreement that allowed it to happen, which is simply not that case. There is an NCAA penalty for wearing color as the visiting team. It is/was the loss of 1 time out. The USC/UCLA "agreement" didn't change the rule or the penalty. UCLA decided to burn a timeout in the interest of sportsmanship. USC could have worn color as the visiting team even if there weren't an "agreement."
Meaning the coaches would do the little timeout thing to even it outOriginally Posted by jeffgdula
Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
you confusing my manOriginally Posted by jeffgdula
I didn't realize two teams could get together and agree to change NCAA rules. Oh wait, they can't. UCLA's coach agreed to call a timeout at the start of the game to equalize the removal of 1 of USC's timeouts.
I will be surprised if Boise is not in blue.
![]()
UCLA's coach agreed to call a timeout at the start of the game to equalize the removal of 1 of USC's timeouts.
my statement
I think both teams came to a agreement cause its a special game
Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
you just took it that way....Originally Posted by jeffgdula
You implied that is it was the agreement that allowed it to happen, which is simply not that case. There is an NCAA penalty for wearing color as the visiting team. It is/was the loss of 1 time out. The USC/UCLA "agreement" didn't change the rule or the penalty. UCLA decided to burn a timeout in the interest of sportsmanship. USC could have worn color as the visiting team even if there weren't an "agreement."Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
you confusing my man![]()
my statement
Meaning the coaches would do the little timeout thing to even it out
I was saying agreement like the timeout thing or working something out around the rule
Originally Posted by jeffgdula
Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
you just took it that way....Originally Posted by jeffgdula
You implied that is it was the agreement that allowed it to happen, which is simply not that case. There is an NCAA penalty for wearing color as the visiting team. It is/was the loss of 1 time out. The USC/UCLA "agreement" didn't change the rule or the penalty. UCLA decided to burn a timeout in the interest of sportsmanship. USC could have worn color as the visiting team even if there weren't an "agreement."
I was saying agreement like the timeout thing or working something out around the rule
If you want to pretend that isn't what you meant, be my guest. And if it trly wasn't, then what you said was irrelevant anyways. We were talking about whether or not they could do it and an agreement about timeouts doesn't speak to whether or not they were allowed to do it.
i know those are ps'ed but that's not how they look these are the offical picsOriginally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
Originally Posted by jeffgdula
Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
you just took it that way....
I was saying agreement like the timeout thing or working something out around the rule
If you want to pretend that isn't what you meant, be my guest. And if it trly wasn't, then what you said was irrelevant anyways. We were talking about whether or not they could do it and an agreement about timeouts doesn't speak to whether or not they were allowed to do it.
anyways..........![]()
back to the equipment
the Bills new unis are growing on me
Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
I think both teams came to a agreement cause its a special gameOriginally Posted by jeffgdula
There was a rule change and I believe the penalty is losing a timeout, not 15 yards. As far as to why they would do it: the same reason UGA is going to wear those clown suits.Originally Posted by ATLfootballer
Both teams can wear home jerseys only if the home team agrees before hand, which is what SC and UCLA do now to go back on tradition, if not then the away team takes a 15 yrd penalty..... For what reason would Boise and UGA both wear home?? Because Nike asked them to?
Mark Richt stated that Georgia is all about tradition but since this was a special game at a special location they agreed with Nike to switch it up just for 1 game
I kinda got the vibe both teams are on the same bage to make this like a bowl game.......so I think it will be Red vs Blue game
If you look at the advertisements you see Georgia is telling all there fans to wear RED and Boise St is telling all there fans to wear BLUE
Originally Posted by Mister Friendly
Anybody tried the Zoom Alpha Talons yet?
I know the pic I posted was a PSOriginally Posted by Shox23
i know those are ps'ed but that's not how they look these are the offical picsOriginally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
Originally Posted by jeffgdula
If you want to pretend that isn't what you meant, be my guest. And if it trly wasn't, then what you said was irrelevant anyways. We were talking about whether or not they could do it and an agreement about timeouts doesn't speak to whether or not they were allowed to do it.
anyways..........![]()
back to the equipment
the Bills new unis are growing on me
![]()
Originally Posted by dreClark
Where did y'all get the neon Oregon socks from?