- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,175
- 202,604
NFL OFF-SEASON THREAD 2022-23: FanDuel getting everybody hemmed up. ESPN went Kamikaze. We in that dead zone of the year y’all.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by aNYone,
- Start date
- Status
- May 7, 2005
- 8,044
- 5,894
- Mar 16, 2010
- 147,048
- 179,315
Falcons really choosing to try to put butts in seats with Desmond Ridder?
- Jan 30, 2010
- 25,827
- 46,738
Jones getting paid means Barkley should get a bag eventually too…If the Giants smart of course, don’t wanna see Danny back there without his RB at his side 
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,175
- 202,604
- May 10, 2013
- 22,652
- 29,319
There was some behavior reasons too.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,175
- 202,604
i knew that was the offseason reason why they tried to move him
but thought he had problems actually staying on the field every season
- May 10, 2013
- 22,652
- 29,319
Believe the Giants felt the behavior outweighed the injuries
- May 1, 2011
- 37,686
- 32,027
I did not think Mahomes deal would look like a bargain this early into it.
This is good for everyone. Everyone except Lamar. Sheesh. Hire an agent man!
This is good for everyone. Everyone except Lamar. Sheesh. Hire an agent man!
big j 33
Supporter
- May 31, 2006
- 36,041
- 16,799
I'm happy with both.
Workout a deal with Saquon and lock up Jones. I didn't expect both to get a contract extension
Workout a deal with Saquon and lock up Jones. I didn't expect both to get a contract extension
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,966
- 31,578
- Oct 2, 2012
- 19,497
- 21,164
- Mar 16, 2010
- 147,048
- 179,315
- Mar 16, 2010
- 147,048
- 179,315
- Jul 10, 2015
- 33,523
- 27,223
I appreciate the media tryin they hardest to push something positive for Atlanta for once
- Jul 10, 2015
- 33,523
- 27,223
- Oct 2, 2012
- 19,497
- 21,164
- Dec 15, 2022
- 1,125
- 1,333
If I’m Lamar I’d gamble on myself again and play on the franchise tag again and test free agency Next offseason.
- Oct 2, 2012
- 19,497
- 21,164
Could it be collusion by the league to not pursue Lamar, because they don’t want to set the precedent of a fully guaranteed contract.
Maybe not, but with the NFL…..
Maybe not, but with the NFL…..
- Jan 2, 2010
- 82,777
- 118,269
Makes zero sense why Atlanta don't want Lamar. Washington might jump and this area would LOVE Lamar.
- Jul 10, 2015
- 33,523
- 27,223
Some dumb ****. I know this teams roster isn’t good overall to where it makes sense but that didn’t stop them from trying to get Watson last year
to not even try? Whatever man.
- Mar 16, 2010
- 147,048
- 179,315
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,966
- 31,578
"Not tampering, but c'mon!"
I love it.
I love it.
- Jan 19, 2002
- 23,412
- 5,523
How could every team mentioned NOT be interested or pursue Lamar?
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,175
- 202,604
no one should be surprised.. especially with his mom being his agent too
you know the teams want someone the could legit bad mouth dude, but the agent has to consider their relationship with the team because of potential future dealings for other clients
- Status
