rhythm808
Banned
- 1,221
- 164
They won't let me up-vote you, but QFT.Homosexuality is not natural and cannot be.
What people are seeking to do it normalize an unnatural paradigm.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They won't let me up-vote you, but QFT.Homosexuality is not natural and cannot be.
What people are seeking to do it normalize an unnatural paradigm.
Of course it is, it exists. That doesn't make it normal.Edit: Homosexuality is in science look it up
They will be the future spoiled popular kid.
They could be whatever they want to be....but they would understand that they would not display any affection in front of me.It would be terrific if your children were gay.
That would be your side. I am the one that bases things on logic and facts.This guy is the type of person who uses a folded up 20 dollar bill as "proof" that 9/11 was an inside job.
Homosexuality is not natural and cannot be.
What people are seeking to do it normalize an unnatural paradigm.
Home
About
Get Involved
Subscriptions
Ads
Archive
Essay Contest
Contact
Breaktime Blogs
Do Animals Exhibit Homosexuality?
ARASH FEREYDOONI MARCH 14, 2012 11
Recent research has found that homosexual behavior in animals may be much more common than previously thought. Although Darwin’s theory of natural selection predicts an evolutionary disadvantage for animals that fail to pass along their traits through reproduction with the opposite sex, the validity of this part of his theory has been questioned with the discoveries of homosexual behavior in more than 10% of prevailing species throughout the world.
Human beings are not the only animals to exhibit homosexual behavior. Photo courtesy of the globalanimal.org.
Currently, homosexual behavior has been documented in over 450 different animal species worldwide. For instance, observations indicate that Humboldt, King, Gentoo, and Adélie penguins of the same sex engage in “mating rituals like entwining their necks and vocalizing to one another.” In addition, male giraffes have also been observed engaging in homosexual behavior by rubbing their necks against each others’ bodies while ignoring the females. Yet another example is lizards of the genus Teiidae, which can copulate with both male and female mates.
Biologists Nathan W. Bailey and Marlene Zuk from the University of California, Riverside have investigated the evolutionary consequences and implications of same-sex behavior, and their findings demonstrate benefits to what seems to be an evolutionary paradox. For example, their studies of the Laysan albatross show that female-female pairing can increase fitness by taking advantage of the excess of females and shortage of males in the population and provide superior care for offspring. Moreover, same-sex pairing in many species actually alleviates the likelihood of divorce and curtails the pressure on the opposite sex by allowing members to exhibit more flexibility to form partnerships, which in turn strengthens social bonds and reduces competition. Thus, not only do animals exhibit homosexuality, but the existence of this behavior is quite prevalent and may also confer certain evolutionary advantages.
Let me begin by challenging the use of the word “prevalence.” Homosexual behavior can be found among animals, but to suggest it is so common and widespread to be “prevalent” is quite a stretch.http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...spread-in-animals-according-to-new-study.html
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx
http://www.yalescientific.org/2012/03/do-animals-exhibit-homosexuality/
Home
About
Get Involved
Subscriptions
Ads
Archive
Essay Contest
Contact
Breaktime Blogs
Do Animals Exhibit Homosexuality?
ARASH FEREYDOONI MARCH 14, 2012 11
Recent research has found that homosexual behavior in animals may be much more common than previously thought. Although Darwin’s theory of natural selection predicts an evolutionary disadvantage for animals that fail to pass along their traits through reproduction with the opposite sex, the validity of this part of his theory has been questioned with the discoveries of homosexual behavior in more than 10% of prevailing species throughout the world.
Human beings are not the only animals to exhibit homosexual behavior. Photo courtesy of the globalanimal.org.
Currently, homosexual behavior has been documented in over 450 different animal species worldwide. For instance, observations indicate that Humboldt, King, Gentoo, and Adélie penguins of the same sex engage in “mating rituals like entwining their necks and vocalizing to one another.” In addition, male giraffes have also been observed engaging in homosexual behavior by rubbing their necks against each others’ bodies while ignoring the females. Yet another example is lizards of the genus Teiidae, which can copulate with both male and female mates.
Biologists Nathan W. Bailey and Marlene Zuk from the University of California, Riverside have investigated the evolutionary consequences and implications of same-sex behavior, and their findings demonstrate benefits to what seems to be an evolutionary paradox. For example, their studies of the Laysan albatross show that female-female pairing can increase fitness by taking advantage of the excess of females and shortage of males in the population and provide superior care for offspring. Moreover, same-sex pairing in many species actually alleviates the likelihood of divorce and curtails the pressure on the opposite sex by allowing members to exhibit more flexibility to form partnerships, which in turn strengthens social bonds and reduces competition. Thus, not only do animals exhibit homosexuality, but the existence of this behavior is quite prevalent and may also confer certain evolutionary advantages.
That would be your side. I am the one that bases things on logic and facts.
I've posted scientific studies which support the way I view homosexuality.You said society is the victim of homosexuality. I wouldn't say facts and logic are your strong points. I wouldn't put them on a cv under "strengths" if I was you.
Come to think of it, I don't remember you posting any "facts" in this thread. You mainly rely on your disgust. That's hardly a platform to be proud of.
Let me begin by challenging the use of the word “prevalence.” Homosexual behavior can be found among animals, but to suggest it is so common and widespread to be “prevalent” is quite a stretch.
Let’s examine this question from a few different angles. First, are we to presume that just because something exists it must be “normal”? Cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, muscular dystrophy — they all exist as part of the consequences of a fallen world. But we call them birth defects, not birth normalities, precisely because they represent devations from the norm. And what is that norm? The human being functioning according to God’s design.
Second, let’s consider the reasons for this behavior in animals: Animal homosexuality is observed most frequently in those that have yet to reach a mature state, and it’s manifest as playful, immature antics. But homosexual behavior can also be seen by animals attempting to prove their dominance. When one male mounts his male counterpart, it is an act of hierarchical aggression, not an expression of sexual lust or even sexual interest. For proof of this, just present a female in heat. The same-sex behavior is abandoned — quickly.
And lastly, this whole line of argument should be insulting to any human being. We are not animals. We are endowed with superior minds by the Creator of the universe, who (even more importantly) came to die for us, giving us inestimable value. To compare humans in any way to dogs or cats or cheetahs or zebras or orangutans or platypuses trivializes God’s design. So the next time you’re faced with this argument, you might think of resounding with, “I bet you’re glad your mom doesn’t believe the same way you do. In the animal world, some mothers eat their young.”
MIKE HALEY
101 Frequently Asked Questions About Homosexuality (2004) Harvest House: Eugene, Oregon
Maybe moms can start eating their young too.
humans are not animals now?
We are endowed with superior minds by the Creator of the universe, who (even more importantly) came to die for us, giving us inestimable value.
That has nothing to do with my position though. This was copy and pasted. You are simply picking one part out of an entire argument which is true regardless of god.There it is. Textbook, indeed.
well now things make a little more senseWe are endowed with superior minds by the Creator of the universe, who (even more importantly) came to die for us, giving us inestimable value.
That has nothing to do with my position though. This was copy and pasted. You are simply picking one part out of an entire argument which is true regardless of god.
what race, religion, and nationality are you?Clearly they do if everything they called for came to fruition. Stop trying to hide the truth....textbook of their planIrrelevant.
They do not speak for the gay community. Period.
Second, let’s consider the reasons for this behavior in animals: Animal homosexuality is observed most frequently in those that have yet to reach a mature state, and it’s manifest as playful, immature antics. But homosexual behavior can also be seen by animals attempting to prove their dominance. When one male mounts his male counterpart, it is an act of hierarchical aggression, not an expression of sexual lust or even sexual interest. For proof of this, just present a female in heat. The same-sex behavior is abandoned — quickly.There it is. Textbook, indeed.
That has nothing to do with my position though. This was copy and pasted. You are simply picking one part out of an entire argument which is true regardless of god.There it is. Textbook, indeed.
Caucasian, half Wasp / Jewish ethnicity, I don't identify with any religion. I am American.
what, race, religion nationality are you?
i'm sure you know where i'm going to go with this.
Not at all, copy and pasting another piece does not mean that my position lines up 100% with that person's position. I put in bold the part that I was referring to in a reply.You should have proofread that first.
You done ****** up