Nigeria bans gay marriage, gay meetings -- Does so secretly

[rhythm808]

"I only use logic and facts"

cites God as a source

I put in bold the part that I was referring to.

 

[goldenchild9]

Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity. - Simon LeVay a British-American neuroscientist. He is renowned for his studies about brain structures and sexual orientation.

Properly speaking, homosexuality does not exist among animals.... For reasons of survival, the reproductive instinct among animals is always directed towards an individual of the opposite sex. Therefore, an animal can never be homosexual as such. Nevertheless, the interaction of other instincts (particularly dominance) can result in behavior that appears to be homosexual. Such behavior cannot be equated with an animal homosexuality. All it means is that animal sexual behavior encompasses aspects beyond that of reproduction.

/******ed regurgitated cliches


Bonobos will mount a box, stuffed animal a plant whatever is near them to diffuse anxious or excited energy.

Dogs will mount each other based off of pure chemical impetus brought on by estrus.

Males animals will often mount each other as displays of social dominance (akin to jail rape).

The frequency of these behaviors increase in the presence of habitat destruction, crapped living confines and the degradation of traditional animal social structures....sound familiar?

For instance in elephants...."Female same-sex behaviours have been documented only in captivity where they are known to masturbate one other with their trunks."

Stop regurgitating and think critically.

 

[rhythm808]

 If seemingly "homosexual" acts among animals are in accordance with animal nature, then parental killing of offspring and intra-species devouring are also in accordance with animal nature. Bringing man into the equation complicates things further. Are we to conclude that filicide and cannibalism are according to human nature?

 

[RIP sleazyy]

right because abortion doesn't exist, and eating people is perfectly healthy.

The gay cannibal murderer agenda is so powerful it has permeated the animal kingdom. We really are in trouble.

 

[nako xl]

 

You said society is the victim of homosexuality. I wouldn't say facts and logic are your strong points. I wouldn't put them on a cv under "strengths" if I was you.

Come to think of it, I don't remember you posting any "facts" in this thread. You mainly rely on your disgust. That's hardly a platform to be proud of.

I've posted scientific studies which support the way I view homosexuality.

A prominent Italian historian has claimed that the Roman Empire collapsed because a “contagion of homosexuality and effeminacy” made it easy pickings for barbarian hordes, sparking a furious row. Roberto De Mattei, 63, the deputy head of the country’s National Research Council, claimed that the empire was fatally weakened after conquering Carthage, which he described as “a paradise for homosexuals”. The remarks prompted angry calls for his resignation, with critics saying his comments were homophobic, offensive and unbecoming of his position. The fall of the Roman Empire was a result of “the effeminacy of a few in Carthage, a paradise for homosexuals, who infected the many. “The abhorrent presence of a few gays infected a good part of the (Roman) people,” Prof Mattei told Radio Maria, a Catholic radio station The Roman Republic achieved domination over Carthage, in present-day Tunisia, during the Punic Wars of the third and second centuries BC, during which Hannibal made his ultimately abortive crossing of the Alps with war elephants. After the third and final Punic War, Carthage fell into Roman hands, followed by most of the other dependencies of the Carthaginian Empire. Prof Mattei claimed that it was as the capital of Rome’s North African provinces that Cartagena became a hotbed of sexual perversion, gradually influencing Rome itself, which eventually fell to barbarian tribes in 410AD

i'm also gonna go out on a limb and guess you don't know anything about the Roman Empire, do you?  If you did, you wouldn't have posted this.

True or false you're just Googling "Why is gay bad?" and copy/pasting the results here?

 

[johnnyderp]

this thread is so unintentionally hilarious.

 

[rhythm808]

right because abortion doesn't exist.

The gay agenda is so powerful it has permeated the animal kingdom. We really are in trouble.

Well you are citing animals conducting homosexual activity as proof that it is normal.  Since animals eat their offspring, and intra-species devouring, is that normal for humans as well?

 

[rhythm808]

 
i'm also gonna go out on a limb and guess you don't know anything about the Roman Empire, do you?  If you did, you wouldn't have posted this.

True or false you're just Googling "Why is gay bad?" and copy/pasting the results here?

Not at all....homosexuality is one of the reasons, not the only reason for the fall of the Roman Empire. 

 

[rhythm808]

 
LOL @ my man citing scientific studies from 500 AD

The studies I have cited were from 1992 and the second was conducted more recently than that, but I do not have a specific year.  Also, the study conducted in 1992 is endorsed by the US Government...

 

[nako xl]

 

 
what, race, religion nationality are you?

i'm sure you know where i'm going to go with this.

Caucasian, half Wasp / Jewish ethnicity, I don't identify with any religion.  I am American.

Do I have to dig around NT for all the "White person Conspiracy" "Jewish infiltrator" "American disaster X was an inside job" "Americans are terrorists" threads that cite all sorts of wacky literature that's written by fellow White Waspy/Jewish American citizens and contain SOME things that seem to coincidentally be true, just to post them here and have you argue down how they don't pertain to this topic because they don't support YOUR position?

Or can we just agree that your point and argument as regards to that quote you keep spamming is stupid, and move on from there?

 

[deleted]

Rhythm808 what time do you have to be back on the 700 Club set?

 

[rhythm808]

 If seemingly "homosexual" acts among animals are in accordance with animal nature, then parental killing of offspring and intra-species devouring are also in accordance with animal nature. Bringing man into the equation complicates things further. Are we to conclude that filicide and cannibalism are according to human nature?

Stop ignoring this and address it.
 

 

[rare]

This thread is moving at light speed, to infinity and beyond!

 

[rhythm808]

Rhythm808 what time do you have to be back on the 700 Club set?

I am agnostic, so never. 

 

[goldenchild9]

Biologists Nathan W. Bailey and Marlene Zuk from the University of California, Riverside have investigated the evolutionary consequences and implications of same-sex behavior, and their findings demonstrate benefits to what seems to be an evolutionary paradox. For example, their studies of the Laysan albatross show that female-female pairing can increase fitness by taking advantage of the excess of females and shortage of males in the population and provide superior care for offspring. Moreover, same-sex pairing in many species actually alleviates the likelihood of divorce and curtails the pressure on the opposite sex by allowing members to exhibit more flexibility to form partnerships, which in turn strengthens social bonds and reduces competition. Thus, not only do animals exhibit homosexuality, but the existence of this behavior is quite prevalent and may also confer certain evolutionary advantages.

Use your damn brain please people....

1) The birds are reacting to an unnatural ratio of male to female animals. This is an attempt to survive due to societal destruction brought on by man's destructive behaviors.

2) How did they get offspring in the first place? Did they go to the Albatross fertility clinic and get artificially inseminated? No they had heterosexual relations. The same sex pairing is merely a normalizing of unnatural behavior brought about by unnatural external forces.

".....it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity."


'The frequency of these behaviors increase in the presence of habitat destruction, crapped living confines and the degradation of traditional animal social structures....sound familiar?"

The only way that this behavior can be seen as natural is if it in natural to have a male shortage in the first place, which is not the case.

" Male sexual behavior proved to be a sensitive index of EDC (endocrine disrupting chemicals) exposure and embryonic exposure to a variety of EDCs consistently resulted in impaired male sexual behavior. "

Normalizing this trend of same-sex Albatross pairing is essentially normalizing environmental destruction and ecological degradation.


Any more pseudo-scientific claims?

 

[rhythm808]

 
Do I have to dig around NT for all the "White person Conspiracy" "Jewish infiltrator" "American disaster X was an inside job" "Americans are terrorists" threads that cite all sorts of wacky literature that's written by fellow White Waspy/Jewish American citizens and contain SOME things that seem to coincidentally be true, just to post them here and have you argue down how they don't pertain to this topic because they don't support YOUR position?

Or can we just agree that your point and argument as regards to that quote you keep spamming is stupid, and move on from there?

It isn't stupid at all.  This is a classic homosexual agenda move.....  Down play what the opposition is saying, try and diminish their credibility, even though what they are saying is factual.  What piece of factual information do you base your viewpoint on?


 If seemingly "homosexual" acts among animals are in accordance with animal nature, then parental killing of offspring and intra-species devouring are also in accordance with animal nature. Bringing man into the equation complicates things further. Are we to conclude that filicide and cannibalism are according to human nature?

 

[lobotomybeats]

I am agnostic, so never. 

You posted something from a Focus on the Family worker. Do you really think it's crazy that everyone is laughing at your facts?

 

[RIP sleazyy]

 If seemingly "homosexual" acts among animals are in accordance with animal nature, then parental killing of offspring and intra-species devouring are also in accordance with animal nature. Bringing man into the equation complicates things further. Are we to conclude that filicide and cannibalism are according to human nature?

Stop ignoring this and address it.

 

I'm pretty sure we don't take kindly to murdering babies and eating people as those things clearly hurt others.

I'm also certain not all animal species behave the same.

I'm also confident in some societies, cannibalism is normal. But here in Murica we don't do those things as you'll go to prison + it's kinda wrong to murder and eat people.

How about you make a good comparison? Like pooping outdoors?

 

[nako xl]

 
 If seemingly "homosexual" acts among animals are in accordance with animal nature, then parental killing of offspring and intra-species devouring are also in accordance with animal nature. Bringing man into the equation complicates things further. Are we to conclude that filicide and cannibalism are according to human nature?

Stop ignoring this and address it.
 

No because not every act animals commit are natural to human beings.  The same argument you make can be used to question dozens of other things animals do that humans do as well:

Using tools, excreting waste, consuming diverse diets, engaging in intercourse. 

We do many of the same things plants do as well.  It doesn't mean any such behavior is any less natural to us just because another living being is capable of it.

 

[nako xl]

 

 
Do I have to dig around NT for all the "White person Conspiracy" "Jewish infiltrator" "American disaster X was an inside job" "Americans are terrorists" threads that cite all sorts of wacky literature that's written by fellow White Waspy/Jewish American citizens and contain SOME things that seem to coincidentally be true, just to post them here and have you argue down how they don't pertain to this topic because they don't support YOUR position?

Or can we just agree that your point and argument as regards to that quote you keep spamming is stupid, and move on from there?

It isn't stupid at all.  This is a classic homosexual agenda move.....  Down play what the opposition is saying, try and diminish their credibility, even though what they are saying is factual.  What piece of factual information do you base your viewpoint on?


 If seemingly "homosexual" acts among animals are in accordance with animal nature, then parental killing of offspring and intra-species devouring are also in accordance with animal nature. Bringing man into the equation complicates things further. Are we to conclude that filicide and cannibalism are according to human nature?

Obama’s Homosexual Agenda & The Jews Behind It: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=458

If what you're saying is true, and because certain things outlined in those websites and that "textbook" you keep citing seemingly coming true is undeniable evidence of the conspiracies truth and existence.... then undoubtedly you, as a member of the Chosen Faith, have a hand in it right?

I mean homosexuality is a part of the white jewish agenda.  And you sir are Jewish.  It's all right there.

 

[rhythm808]

You posted something from a Focus on the Family worker. Do you really think it's crazy that everyone is laughing at your facts?

I bolded the part I was referring to....but keep picking and choosing what you pay attention to...it seems as though you do it for the rest of your life anyway. 

 

[rhythm808]

I'm pretty sure we don't take kindly to murdering babies and eating people as those things clearly hurt others.

I'm also certain not all animal species behave the same.

I'm also confident in some societies, cannibalism is normal. But here in Murica we don't do those things as you'll go to prison + it's kinda wrong to murder and eat people.

How about you make a good comparison? Like pooping outdoors.

It is also wrong to be homosexual.

 
No because not every act animals commit are natural to human beings.   The same argument you make can be used to question dozens of other things animals do that humans do as well:

Using tools, excreting waste, consuming diverse diets, engaging in intercourse. 

We do many of the same things plants do as well.  It doesn't mean any such behavior is any less natural to us just because another living being is capable of it.

Homosexuality is one of those deviant behaviors that doesn't transfer from animal behavior to human behavior.  There are human cannibals....they are deviants.  There are human homosexuals....they are deviants. 

The fact that animals conduct in gay behavior has no bearing on whether or not it is normal for humans to do so...and you admitted it in the bolded portion of your statement. 

 

[lobotomybeats]

I bolded the part I was referring to....but keep picking and choosing what you pay attention to...it seems as though you do it for the rest of your life anyway. 

Hahaha. You bolded part of an article written by someone who worked for Focus on the Family. I don't care which part you bolded, look who wrote it.

 

[rhythm808]

 
Obama’s Homosexual Agenda & The Jews Behind It: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=458

If what you're saying is true, and because certain things outlined in those websites and that "textbook" you keep citing seemingly coming true is undeniable evidence of the conspiracies truth and existence.... then undoubtedly you, as a member of the Chosen Faith, have a hand in it right?

I mean homosexuality is a part of the white jewish agenda.  And you sir are Jewish.  It's all right there.

No, because I am Jewish in ethnicity, but not religion.  Also, I clearly have no part in the homosexual agenda...have you been paying attention to what I've been saying? 

 

[rhythm808]

Hahaha. You bolded part of an article written by someone who worked for Focus on the Family. I don't care which part you bolded, look who wrote it.

and what are you basing your viewpoint on?