Nigeria bans gay marriage, gay meetings -- Does so secretly

[rhythm808]

Wrong link

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2637446/

[h1]  [/h1][h1]  [/h1]
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain condition most often affecting one of the limbs.

Not comparable.  This limits them from conducting certain activities, but doesn't cause them to participate in new activities.
 

 

[deleted]

"We provide several lines of evidence indicating that the patient with CRPS has multiple pathological changes of the brain. We observe global disorganization of the relationship between gray and white matter in these subjects."

Their brains are different therefore they are not normal.

How should we treat these people?

 

[boris]

You didn't disect anything that I said.  By stating homosexuality is abnormal, you admitted that heterosexuality was normal for the reasons that I outlined. Lets try and make it more simple for you.


A - H - C - U - R - Q - P - L    Which is the abnormal one?


A - A - A - A - A - A - A - B       Which is the abnormal one?  How do you know that it is abnormal?  If B is abnormal, what does that make A? 
 

Your comprehension appears to be lacking, so I'll try again.

I've already acknowledged that homosexuality is abnormal, by definition. I then asked you to define what makes someone a "normal being" since you claim that homosexual individuals are "abnormal beings" (note: These are your words. I'm trying to figure out what you mean here. In other words, DEFINE). Since you didn't understand the first time, I'm asking you to define what you think a "normal being" is. Since the only thing you decided to bring up was sexuality, I asked if sexuality defines whether someone is a "normal being" or not. Please let me know what about this you aren't understanding. 

You make no sense when you state that bisexuals can be homosexual but not heterosexual. Heterosexuality: sexual feeling or behavior directed toward a person or persons of the opposite sex. Homosexuality: sexual feeling or behavior directed toward a person or persons of one's own sex. You can re-think this one again. 

Since you appear to be creating your own definitions for words, please state them so that we can figure out what you are trying to say. 

 

[deleted]

This guy has utilized almost every one of these. Word to FutureMD

 

[rhythm808]

 
Your comprehension appears to be lacking, so I'll try again.

I've already acknowledged that homosexuality is abnormal, by definition. I then asked you to define what makes someone a "normal being" since you claim that homosexual individuals are "abnormal beings" (note: These are your words. I'm trying to figure out what you mean here. In other words, DEFINE). Since you didn't understand the first time, I'm asking you to define what you think a "normal being" is. Since the only thing you decided to bring up was sexuality, I asked if sexuality defines whether someone is a "normal being" or not. Please let me know what about this you aren't understanding. 

You make no sense when you state that bisexuals can be homosexual but not heterosexual. Heterosexuality: sexual feeling or behavior directed toward a person or persons of the opposite sex. Homosexuality: sexual feeling or behavior directed toward a person or persons of one's own sex. You can re-think this one again. 

Since you appear to be creating your own definitions for words, please state them so that we can figure out what you are trying to say. 

I told you.  By admitting that homosexuality was abnormal, you also admitted that heterosexuality was a normal being by default.  

 

[rhythm808]

This guy has utilized almost every one of these. Word to FutureMD

No I have not.  My viewpoint is based on facts.  Your's is based on conviction.  You are the ones who have been doing things listed on that site. 

 

[rhythm808]

 
Your comprehension appears to be lacking, so I'll try again.

I've already acknowledged that homosexuality is abnormal, by definition. I then asked you to define what makes someone a "normal being" since you claim that homosexual individuals are "abnormal beings" (note: These are your words. I'm trying to figure out what you mean here. In other words, DEFINE). Since you didn't understand the first time, I'm asking you to define what you think a "normal being" is. Since the only thing you decided to bring up was sexuality, I asked if sexuality defines whether someone is a "normal being" or not. Please let me know what about this you aren't understanding. 

You make no sense when you state that bisexuals can be homosexual but not heterosexual. Heterosexuality: sexual feeling or behavior directed toward a person or persons of the opposite sex. Homosexuality: sexual feeling or behavior directed toward a person or persons of one's own sex. You can re-think this one again. 

Since you appear to be creating your own definitions for words, please state them so that we can figure out what you are trying to say. 

A - H - C - U - R - Q - P - L    Which is the abnormal one?


A - A - A - A - A - A - A - B       Which is the abnormal one?  How do you know that it is abnormal?  If B is abnormal, what does that make A? 

 

[boris]

I told you.  By admitting that homosexuality was abnormal, you also admitted that heterosexuality was a normal being by default.  

I think it's clear that you're either incapable of comprehending or you're unwilling to admit you're wrong. You're still repeating something that I already acknowledged multiple times at least a page ago. 

I can't help you if you don't understand plain English. 

Also, effects vs. affects. Check it out. 

 

[rhythm808]

 
I think it's clear that you're either incapable of comprehending or you're unwilling to admit you're wrong. You're still repeating something that I already acknowledged multiple times at least a page ago. 

I can't help you if you don't understand plain English. 

Also, effects vs. affects. Check it out. 

Answer my other question.  

You are the one who is failing to admit they are wrong.  How can something be abnormal without something else being normal?  It is impossible for everything to be abnormal.  Something has to be normal in order for something to be abnormal.  Normal is heterosexuality. 

We know that bisexual isn't normal, because they part of their activities include homosexual activities, which you admitted are abnormal.  Since they participate in the abnormal, they are abnormal. 

 

[boris]

You are the one who is failing to admit they are wrong.  How can something be abnormal without something else being normal?  It is impossible for everything to be abnormal.  Something has to be normal in order for something to be abnormal.  Normal is heterosexuality. 

Your question implies that I suggested that everything is abnormal. 

We know that bisexual isn't normal, because they part of their activities include homosexual activities, which you admitted are abnormal.  Since they participate in the abnormal, they are abnormal. 

I never said bisexuality is normal. What I said was that sexuality isn't black and white. It's not a matter of homosexuality vs. heterosexuality. Pay attention.

 

[rhythm808]

 
Your question implies that I suggested that everything is abnormal. 

I never said bisexuality is normal. What I said was that sexuality isn't black and white. It's not a matter of homosexuality vs. heterosexuality. Pay attention.

I am telling you why heterosexuality is normal by your own definitions.

It is heterosexuality vs homosexuality.  That is the issue at hand.  That is the issue that has been at hand. You pay attention. 

 

[boris]

 

 
Your question implies that I suggested that everything is abnormal. 

I never said bisexuality is normal. What I said was that sexuality isn't black and white. It's not a matter of homosexuality vs. heterosexuality. Pay attention.

I am telling you why heterosexuality is normal by your own definitions.

It is heterosexuality vs homosexuality.  That is the issue at hand.  That is the issue that has been at hand. You pay attention. 

I never said heterosexuality wasn't normal. This was made clear a while back.

It's not a matter of heterosexuality vs. homosexuality. There are more options.

You're still stuck on points that were made many posts ago. Take some time to go back and read. When you're all caught up, let me know. 

 

[rhythm808]

 
I never said heterosexuality wasn't normal. This was made clear a while back.

It's not a matter of heterosexuality vs. homosexuality. There are more options.

You're still stuck on points that were made many posts ago. Take some time to go back and read. When you're all caught up, let me know. 

I know exactly what you have said.  The issue at hand is completely heterosexuality vs homosexuality.  It is about normal compared to abnormal.  We are discussing why gay behavior should not be permitted in public, and how homosexuals are abnormal people.  

 

 

[rhythm808]

 
I never said heterosexuality wasn't normal. This was made clear a while back.

It's not a matter of heterosexuality vs. homosexuality. There are more options.

You're still stuck on points that were made many posts ago. Take some time to go back and read. When you're all caught up, let me know. 

Answer this question.  You avoided this. 

A - H - C - U - R - Q - P - L      Which is the abnormal one?


A - A - A - A - A - A - A - B       Which is the abnormal one?  How do you know that it is abnormal?  If B is abnormal, what does that make A? 

 

[RIP sleazyy]

I didn't claim you did. Chill.


They post "scientific studies" too, I'd grab screens but I'm permabanned.


And I saw the link PLVN is talking about. Go back and look at it.


do your research, b.

So you are saying the scientific studies I linked aren't scientific studies?  That would be a lie. 

That would be an assumption. They posted scientific studies too but there was clear bias, I mean its stormfront.

dem eugenics. they love scientific racism over there. when your incoherent racist rambling doesn't prove your point, find a racist scientist that agrees with you and use "BUT SCIENCE!" as your crutch.

There's some really smart dudes over there, I had some great conversations with the ones who would talk to me but it's incredibly sad that they use their intelligence the way they do.

You remind me of some of them, which is not necessarily a terrible thing, but it's true. You don't come off as a dumb dude, just very opinionated.

Sleazy


You permabanned from sstormfront for real?

I can't access the site from my phone or my home IP they said I was trolling.

I was but it wasn't even that serious

Hell I thought everyone liked interracial porn.

 

[boris]

Answer this question.  You avoided this. 

A - H - C - U - R - Q - P - L      Which is the abnormal one?


A - A - A - A - A - A - A - B       Which is the abnormal one?  How do you know that it is abnormal?  If B is abnormal, what does that make A? 

One step at a time. I asked you a few questions quite some time ago that you still haven't addressed. That's why I'm encouraging you to go back and read. 

 

[rhythm808]

That would be an assumption. They posted scientific studies too but there was clear bias, I mean its stormfront.

dem eugenics. they love scientific racism over there. when your incoherent racist rambling doesn't prove your point, find a racist scientist that agrees with you and use "BUT SCIENCE!" as your crutch.

There's some really smart dudes over there, I had some great conversations with the ones who would talk to me but it's incredibly sad that they use their intelligence the way they do.

You remind me of some of them, which is not necessarily a terrible thing, but it's true. You don't come off as a dumb dude, just very opinionated.
 

Well the study I linked you to was on a US government website so it is not some shady study.  I do research before I formulate a viewpoint. 

 

 

[rhythm808]

 
One step at a time. I asked you a few questions quite some time ago that you still haven't addressed. That's why I'm encouraging you to go back and read. 

And what question would that be?  I've answered your questions, you just don't like my answers. 

 

[boris]

 

 
One step at a time. I asked you a few questions quite some time ago that you still haven't addressed. That's why I'm encouraging you to go back and read. 

And what question would that be?  I've answered your questions, you just don't like my answers. 

If you can't figure it out after I've spelled it out, we're going to continue this endless cycle where you repeat points that were agreed upon many posts ago. I'll wait, but I won't be posting again until you understand why what you're saying is either wrong or failing to answer my questions. 

 

[RIP sleazyy]

I believe you.

But you have to remember, even from the US government, that does not remove bias nor the shady factor.

You're posting studies from the same government that infected American citizens and Guatemalan people with syphilis in the name of science. The same government that allowed scientists who experimented on and murdered your people to be free from consequences in exchange for research. they even brought them here to work for this country.

I honestly prefer research done without government interference because we all know they like to skew facts and stats and misrepresent things.

 

[rhythm808]

 
If you can't figure it out after I've spelled it out, we're going to continue this endless cycle where you repeat points that were agreed upon many posts ago. I'll wait, but I won't be posting again until you understand why what you're saying is either wrong or failing to answer my questions. 

What is your question?

 

[rhythm808]

I believe you.

But you have to remember, even from the US government, that does not remove bias nor the shady factor.

You're posting studies from the same government that infected American citizens and Guatemalan people with syphilis in the name of science. The same government that allowed scientists who experimented on and murdered your people to be free from consequences in exchange for research. they even brought them here to work for this country.

I honestly prefer research done without government interference because we all know they like to skew facts and stats and misrepresent things.

No one was purposefully infected with syphilis during the Tuskegee Syphilis study.  That is a myth. 

 

[RIP sleazyy]

that is true, my mistake.

purposely infected Guatemalans and misled Americans about their treatment*

 

[heatpinoyboy]

What's the issue at hand right now. I don't want to barge into a home without knowing what to bring to the party.

 

[epidemik the great]

What's the issue at hand right now. I don't want to barge into a home without knowing what to bring to the party.

-Nigeria wants to throw gay people/sympathisers in jail for their lifestyle/beliefs
-people here think it's cool because they don't agree with the lifestyle
-same people that ***** about the mistreatment of blacks in America by the government can't see any type of parallel because they don't want to