Nigeria bans gay marriage, gay meetings -- Does so secretly

You follow the word of Jesus, yet decide to ignore clear scripture? I'm not even religious and I know that...

Leviticus 20:13 : "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."


It is impossible to be a follower of Jesus without being extremely anti gay.  




By that logic it would have been impossible for those in favor of the abolishment of slavery to be Christian.

Leviticus 25:44-46

You may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance.




Ephesians 6:5-6

Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. 6 Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart.



Leviticus 27:1-4

The Lord said to Moses, “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘If anyone makes a special vow to dedicate a person to the Lord by giving the equivalent value, set the value of a male between the ages of twenty and sixty at fifty shekels of silver, according to the sanctuary shekel; for a female, set her value at thirty shekels

hmmm... women worth 3/5s the value of a man ? That sounds awfully familiar to the U.S. Constitution’s provision that a slave was only worth 3/5 of a white man. "Lord" knows where they came up with those numbers. :rolleyes
 
By that logic it would have been impossible for those in favor of the abolishment of slavery to be Christian.

Leviticus 25:44-46

You may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance.




Ephesians 6:5-6

Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. 6 Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart.



Leviticus 27:1-4

The Lord said to Moses, “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘If anyone makes a special vow to dedicate a person to the Lord by giving the equivalent value, set the value of a male between the ages of twenty and sixty at fifty shekels of silver, according to the sanctuary shekel; for a female, set her value at thirty shekels

hmmm... women worth 3/5s the value of a man ? That sounds awfully familiar to the U.S. Constitution’s provision that a slave was only worth 3/5 of a white man. "Lord" knows where they came up with those numbers.
eyes.gif
I am not the one who said they were religious.  I never recommended living by the word of the bible. I was simply pointing out it is impossible to be christian and pro-gay. 
 
 
I am not the one who said they were religious.  I never recommended living by the word of the bible. I was simply pointing out it is impossible to be christian and pro-gay. 
most christians pick and choose which rules from the bible they want to abide by though. so although it doesnt make any sense, its widely accepted and quite common. no sense in arguing about it; not you in particular, just in general.
 
 
most christians pick and choose which rules from the bible they want to abide by though. so although it doesnt make any sense, its widely accepted and quite common. no sense in arguing about it; not you in particular, just in general.
You can't pick and choose.  The entire piece makes up Christianity.  It isn't up to an individual to say this matters, and this doesn't.  By allowing that behavior, it makes the entire religion arbitrary and meaningless.  

It is impossible to be Christian and be pro-gay. 
 
 
You can't pick and choose.  The entire piece makes up Christianity.  It isn't up to an individual to say this matters, and this doesn't.  By allowing that behavior, it makes the entire religion arbitrary and meaningless.  

It is impossible to be Christian and be pro-gay. 
i agree with you.

i'm saying that barely any modern christians these days abide by ALL the rules. and you're absolutely right, that's why the religion is now arbitrary and meaningless.
 
 
i agree with you.

i'm saying that barely any modern christians these days abide by ALL the rules. and you're absolutely right, that's why the religion is now arbitrary and meaningless.
Exactly.  It still has no bearing on whether or not homosexuals are abnormal deviants (which they are).  It is only relevant in regards to people who "practice" the religion. 
 
Essentially Rhythm is saying that if you aren't the Westboro Baptist Church, you are doing your religion a disservice.
So now this is a religious thread?  

I didn't write the scripture.  The bottom line is...it is impossible to be pro-gay and Christian.  That is it. 
 
I agree there is an oxymoron in being christian and gay.Still many gay or transgender people feel so close to christianity ( or whatever religion) as a clearance path for their 'sin' to be homosexual. Its just sad. :{

On topic , its really really awful to discriminate.Any kind of discrimination.
 
I agree there is an oxymoron in being christian and gay.Still many gay or transgender people feel so close to christianity ( or whatever religion) as a clearance path for their 'sin' to be homosexual. Its just sad.
mean.gif


On topic , its really really awful to discriminate.Any kind of discrimination.
It is okay to discriminate when one's behavior is deviant and a detriment to society....Ie: pedophiles.  

Homosexuals are a detriment. 
 
It is okay to discriminate when one's behavior is deviant and a detriment to society....Ie: pedophiles.  


Homosexuals are a detriment. 

My bad then , thought discrimination was used only for bad things.

p.s. English not my native language ... :rolleyes
 
 
 
what are homosexual actions? there are cultures where its normal for boys to hold hands, in some parts of europe its normal to kiss another man on the cheek as a greeting, there was a thread on NT about an african culture that thought jerking another dude off would help him recover from being knocked out, men let other men feel them up at security check points, men show male doctors their ***** when getting checkups. heterosexual people do things that could be considered a homosexual actions every day
Making sure you do not have a disease is not homosexual behavior.  Classic gay agenda tactics to manipulate and twist the truth.  So are you saying that we should base our society on African villages?  In that case, we should cut off the ****oris of every women...if they do it, why not?  

What are homosexual actions? Having sexual relations where a man plays the role of the woman....adult men holding hands, adult men kissing on the lips in public, etc.  Do you need me to spell it out for you?
Heterosexual men who enjoy being anally penetrated: 

http://www.salon.com/2011/03/27/pegging

http://jezebel.com/5782240/everything-you-need-to-know-about-pegging

http://www.alternet.org/my-wife-pegged-me-and-i-liked-it

Straight guys doing "gay things."

Enough?
 
Last edited:
Here's what's happened to Rhythm. He's conveniently "researched" things and found evidence to rationalize his bigotry. In a world that is slowly evolving to accept homosexuality, he's better served by finding evidence to suggest that he's not wrong to be repulsed. Whereas everyone else finds sympathy for homosexuals when learning that homosexuality isn't a choice, he sees this as ammunition to label them as freaks. In his Rube Goldberg mind, he has successfully made his case as to why his uneasiness isn't repulsive. He isn't as comfortable saying homosexuals are repulsive as he asserts though. His incessant need to provide "scientific data" makes that clear. If homosexuality makes you uneasy, just say it makes you uneasy. Instead we have a constant bludgeoning of drivel trying to prove that his repulsion isn't only warranted, but anyone who isn't repulsed is the victim of propaganda. "They are abnormal, I'm right to be hateful. If you don't hate them, you are a victim" He may sound arrogant, but at heart he is insecure in his hatred. That's what happens when you're the last of the gang to grow up. Ironically, he needs people to be accepting of him. He tries to do this by showing that he is "educated." When I pointed out that I was a better person for my acceptance of people, he didn't come back with reasons as to why his hatred makes him a better person. Instead he comes back with a list including savings, a car and travels. He said his kid would be the "spoiled popular" one. Again, nothing about him as a person. He's the poster child for insecurity. It explains his inability to rest on his hate laurels. "How can I be wrong, I have all of this stuff?" It also explains why he feels the need to denigrate a group of people who are becoming more and more accepted. He needs to knock them down a peg or two to cover up the fact that he has nothing of any worth to offer. Their acceptance isn't a threat to society, it's a threat to his transparent "superiority"

Most who are sympathetic to homosexuals look at not choosing your sexuality as reason to allow them the same courtesies and rights that heterosexuals enjoy; not Rhythm. This is enough reason to treat them poorly and be hateful. He has poor views of homosexual sympathizers because people have poor views on bigots as a whole.

He can point to this or that to show the homosexual "deviance." All of which are just transparent admissions that he is child who needs to justify his "icky" feeling.
 
Last edited:
Here's what's happened to Rhythm. He's conveniently "researched" things and found evidence to rationalize his bigotry. In a world that is slowly evolving to accept homosexuality, he's better served by finding evidence to suggest that he's not wrong to be repulsed. Whereas everyone else finds sympathy for homosexuals when learning that homosexuality isn't a choice, he sees this as ammunition to label them as freaks. In his Rube Goldberg mind, he has successfully made his case as to why his uneasiness isn't repulsive. He isn't as comfortable saying homosexuals are repulsive as he asserts though. His incessant need to provide "scientific data" makes that clear. If homosexuality makes you uneasy, just say it makes you uneasy. Instead we have a constant bludgeoning of drivel trying to prove that his repulsion isn't only warranted, but anyone who isn't repulsed is the victim of propaganda. "They are abnormal, I'm right to be hateful. If you don't hate them, you are a victim" He may sound arrogant, but at heart he is insecure in his hatred. That's what happens when you're the last of the gang to grow up. Ironically, he needs people to be accepting of him. He tries to do this by showing that he is "educated." When I pointed out that I was a better person for my acceptance of people, he didn't come back with reasons as to why his hatred makes him a better person. Instead he comes back with a list including savings, a car and travels. He said his kid would be the "spoiled popular" one. Again, nothing about him as a person. He's the poster child for insecurity. It explains his inability to rest on his hate laurels. "How can I be wrong, I have all of this stuff?" It also explains why he feels the need to denigrate a group of people who are becoming more and more accepted. He needs to knock them down a peg or two to cover up the fact that he has nothing of any worth to offer. Their acceptance isn't a threat to society, it's a threat to his transparent "superiority"

Most who are sympathetic to homosexuals look at not choosing your sexuality as reason to allow them the same courtesies and rights that heterosexuals enjoy; not Rhythm. This is enough reason to treat them poorly and be hateful.

He can point to this or that to show the homosexual "deviance." All of which are just transparent admissions that he is child who needs to justify his "icky" feeling.
nerd.gif
well this seems eerily accurate.

you've read the man like a book. repped.
 
Gay parenting
Straight parenting:
[h1]  [/h1]
[h1]Mom, dad planned child sex abuse before kids were born[/h1]
[h2]Jonathan and Sarah Adleta were convicted in Orlando; he faces life in prison.[/h2]


September 12, 2013|By Amy Pavuk, Orlando Sentinel

Jonathan and Sarah Adleta's children were doomed to a life of perverse cruelty before they were even born.

Jonathan Adleta, a former Marine officer, dreamed of the day he could have "daddy-daughter sex." After Sarah Adleta became pregnant with a daughter, he said he would marry her only if she agreed to let him carry out that desire. When the couple had a son, Sarah Adleta was expected to have sexual encounters with him.

pixel.gif


pixel.gif


In an Orlando federal courtroom this week, prosecutors and witnesses described, in disturbing and graphic detail, the heinous exploitation and abuse the couple's toddlers endured at the hands of their parents — even after they divorced.

Jonathan Adleta lived his dream until March, when the FBI received a tip that his 29-year-old former wife was communicating with a North Carolina man who was arrested on charges of having sex with a child.

That's when federal authorities began unraveling a cross-country web of sexual abuse that culminated in convictions for both parents — and could land 25-year-old Jonathan Adleta in prison for life.

Sarah Adleta, a University of Central Florida student, pleaded guilty in May to two charges of sexual exploitation of a minor. She faces 15 to 30 years in federal prison and will be sentenced next month. On Thursday, jurors found Jonathan Adleta guilty of two child-sex charges. He'll be sentenced in December and faces 10 years to life in prison.

The charges against him stem from abuse that occurred in December, when Sarah Adleta and the couple's two children traveled to his home in Oklahoma so he could have sexual contact with his daughter.

But to tell the Adletas' story, prosecutors had to take jurors to the beginning.

In opening statements, Assistant U.S. Attorney Karen Gable characterized Adleta as a father who had a "sexual appetite" for his own daughter.

Sarah Adleta testified that when she began dating Jonathan in 2008 — she was living with her family in Oviedo and he in an apartment in the Goldenrod area — he began showing her stories about fathers and daughters having sex, to gauge her interest in the possibility.

Their daughter was born in March 2009, and Sarah Adleta became pregnant with their son not long after.

Sarah Adleta, who testified for several hours this week wearing Orange County Jail garb, said she initially struggled with the concept and thought Jonathan Adleta would lose interest in it.

But she loved him, needed his financial security and said she would do whatever it took to not lose him, she told jurors.

Gable told jurors the couple made sex with their children "part of their parenting plan."

They married in 2010.

The marine was deployed to Afghanistan, and when he returned, the family moved to California, where he was stationed. There, his ex-wife said, he had more sexual contact with the children.

pixel.gif


In late 2011, Jonathan Adleta filed for divorce, and Sarah Adleta later returned to Central Florida. But even with thousands of miles between them, she allowed her former husband to continue to prey on his daughter electronically through the videoconference program Skype.

By the spring of 2012, Jonathan Adleta had found a new girlfriend who agreed to let him victimize her daughter.

The girlfriend, 23-year-old Samantha Bryant — a Texas mother he met on a dating website — testified this week that she watched as Jonathan Adleta molested her daughter. On at least one occasion, she took pictures of the assault.

Bryant, who was visibly shaken and cried throughout much of her testimony, said Jonathan Adleta asked her to write fantasy-type stories about him having sex with his daughter and her daughter. She did. She also complied when he asked Bryant to perform sex acts on her own daughter.

Bryant was eventually charged with and pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting her daughter and allowing Jonathan Adleta to sexually abuse the girl.

In December, Bryant and her two children spent Christmas in Oklahoma with Jonathan and Sarah Adleta and their two children. Sarah Adleta told jurors that there, her former husband sexually abused their daughter in his bedroom and called her in to watch.

Sarah Adleta, who was emotionless during much of her testimony, began to choke up as she explained what she witnessed.

"She seemed very resistant," she said of her toddler, adding that the child was "really upset" and "frightened."

But Sarah rendered no aid to her crying girl.

Weeks later, after she and the children returned to Oviedo, Jonathan Adleta suggested that his former wife should find another man to abuse their daughter so she would become comfortable with the sex acts, to prevent her from 'freaking out" in the future.

During that time, Sarah Adleta was communicating with Aaron Dixon, a North Carolina man who was later arrested on child-sex charges in an unrelated case. She told jurors she performed sex acts on the children while Dixon watched via Skype.

In her closing argument Thursday, Gable told jurors that the last time the Adletas spoke, they discussed Sarah Adleta's taking their daughter to Dixon so he could sexually abuse the girl.

Jonathan Adleta, the prosecutor said, liked the idea.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...sexual-exploitation-sarah-adleta-sexual-abuse
 
Last edited:
Here's what's happened to Rhythm. He's conveniently "researched" things and found evidence to rationalize his bigotry. In a world that is slowly evolving to accept homosexuality, he's better served by finding evidence to suggest that he's not wrong to be repulsed. Whereas everyone else finds sympathy for homosexuals when learning that homosexuality isn't a choice, he sees this as ammunition to label them as freaks. In his Rube Goldberg mind, he has successfully made his case as to why his uneasiness isn't repulsive. He isn't as comfortable saying homosexuals are repulsive as he asserts though. His incessant need to provide "scientific data" makes that clear. If homosexuality makes you uneasy, just say it makes you uneasy. Instead we have a constant bludgeoning of drivel trying to prove that his repulsion isn't only warranted, but anyone who isn't repulsed is the victim of propaganda. "They are abnormal, I'm right to be hateful. If you don't hate them, you are a victim" He may sound arrogant, but at heart he is insecure in his hatred. That's what happens when you're the last of the gang to grow up. Ironically, he needs people to be accepting of him. He tries to do this by showing that he is "educated." When I pointed out that I was a better person for my acceptance of people, he didn't come back with reasons as to why his hatred makes him a better person. Instead he comes back with a list including savings, a car and travels. He said his kid would be the "spoiled popular" one. Again, nothing about him as a person. He's the poster child for insecurity. It explains his inability to rest on his hate laurels. "How can I be wrong, I have all of this stuff?" It also explains why he feels the need to denigrate a group of people who are becoming more and more accepted. He needs to knock them down a peg or two to cover up the fact that he has nothing of any worth to offer. Their acceptance isn't a threat to society, it's a threat to his transparent "superiority"

Most who are sympathetic to homosexuals look at not choosing your sexuality as reason to allow them the same courtesies and rights that heterosexuals enjoy; not Rhythm. This is enough reason to treat them poorly and be hateful. He has poor views of homosexual sympathizers because people have poor views on bigots as a whole.

He can point to this or that to show the homosexual "deviance." All of which are just transparent admissions that he is child who needs to justify his "icky" feeling.
This post is nothing but a bunch of nonsense.  And as I have pointed out before, is textbook of the homosexual agenda.  

Textbook. 

".. .by conversion [toward public acceptance of homosexuality] we mean... conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media." "...our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof." – Kirk & Madsen, After the Ball, 1989, page 153.


Science proved that homosexuals are abnormal beings.  I am not making it up.  Another group that suffers from abnormal amounts of white brain matter are pedophiles...so if we allow the deviant homosexuals to conduct their deviant behavior, the pedophiles will claim that they suffer from the same abnormality as homosexuals, and if you let homosexuals live in deviancy, they will demand to as well.
 
 
nerd.gif
well this seems eerily accurate.

you've read the man like a book. repped.
You've never met me.  You have no way of knowing if this was true or not, which by the way, it is not.

Textbook.

".. .by conversion [toward public acceptance of homosexuality] we mean... conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media." "...our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof." – Kirk & Madsen, After the Ball, 1989, page 153.
 
Back
Top Bottom