Originally Posted by
SoleAddict34
Originally Posted by
Johnny Appleseed
Originally Posted by CAto312
They look good!
How's the leather quality?
They're just like any other Nike/Jordan retro shoe releasing now...Cheap, stiff, smooth leather...They fit a little narrower than the 99/00-era retrosPaint is extremely thick, glossy...[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]It will most certainly chip/crack[/color]But, for the price it is a much better deal than the similarly styled Jordan 4....I paid only $57 because my girlfriends sister was able to get them for me with her employee discount @ NT. Regardless, its still a great shoe and its worth the full retail price.
Thanks for the pic and review. This is the reason I'm passing.
Decided to pick up the Adidas Decade Hi's instead. The 89s are obviously a cooler looking shoe, but nowadays I'm more concerned with quality and durability. Nike would have so easily gotten my
money on this one if they would have just used a better quality leather like the stuff on the QS SC IIs, but I'm sure then these would have to be labeled "premium" or QS. Anyways...yeah I know, cool story bro.
These are quality and really comfortable