- 5,350
- 4,579
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
Hmm... Will be surprised if this is actually true. I think this is referring to a different 1 though (I hope)
View media item 1510850
View media item 1510850
Last edited:
Nike Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" - May 30, 2015. (LEGIT CHECK IN 1st POST)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by geraldg2309,
- Start date
- 3,855
- 2,265
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
Last edited:
bayyrd
formerly bay1591
- 11,889
- 2,942
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2007
I think the most important question is....
What pizza are we ordering on May 30?
What pizza are we ordering on May 30?
- 3,707
- 1,030
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2013
missed out on kixsquare
Chill Bill
formerly ihaveaquestion
- 3,717
- 2,248
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
Zshz changed the picture
Chi 1s are already popping up in stores
So it has got to be the Sbb 1s
Chi 1s are already popping up in stores
So it has got to be the Sbb 1s
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- 13,517
- 9,516
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
So the Black and White 1s were weak?jaguarfan.gif
Frags >>>>>>> 90sum% of the weak *** Jordan 1s released since '09
What you are saying is that the Frags are essentially the same as the Ronald McDonald PEs....... except for the quality
What?
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- 13,517
- 9,516
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
True, but people think the Frags are the second coming or something.But... If they have good quality materials... Then why would comparing the materials of other Jordan Is be an issue?
It's just like how the Vegas or Banned Is are regularly used as comparisons for quality.
If it's a shoe widely recognized for its quality materials, then people tend to compare similar shoes to them because they're recognized as a feasible standard.
You even acknowledged why the comparison was made, so your post didn't really end up making a point.
- 23,535
- 30,664
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
it pretty much is, name another pair of 1's that has that mold and leather prior to the Frags and post 94. The Frags are pretty much setting the standard to how the 1's quality should properly be. If it wasn't for the Frags, many of you would still be putting up with the same cardboard quality 1's. Now that pictures has surfaced of the Chicagos with Frag type leather quality, it's got you guys drooling extra hard, so don't front like that material means nothing.
Last edited:
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- 13,517
- 9,516
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
Didn't say materials mean nothing man
Leonard Washington
formerly jamesbrustled
- 4,147
- 1,963
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
frags>chicagos
- 23,535
- 30,664
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2013
not directly because you're beating around the bush, saying how no shoe should be compared to the frags because they're all basically the same when thats obviously not true at all. You're saying Frags don't deserve the recognition they get when in fact they do because of how JB made them out to be. It shouldn't even be a discussion anymore because by now everyone should know what the Frag's are in terms of quality. You're getting mad about people comparing Chicago quality to Frag quality is babyish. It's probably the best comparison if you want to know the materials of the Chi's
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
can this lame frag v royals **** stop
- 7,967
- 6,827
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
Before frags all 1s got compared to banneds so now it's frags. Same ol argument. Get over it, we not gettin a regular drop with frag or any other ultra limited quality.
- 702
- 152
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
Let's talk about the '09 Shadow's, banned I's and Vegas I's. All 3 of those were freaking amazing. That Vegas pair had thick leather and was more plush than almost any Jordan I own. Hah and I pretty much own all of them.
- 2,407
- 905
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
Fiending a pair of Banneds.
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
i do too... got all three for under $140 each too
- 702
- 152
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
win win for you my friend. I got my banned 1's for $160 at the time. Thought that price was ludicrous at the time. Haha I ain't complaining now.
- 1,933
- 465
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2014
Just saw this box and think it's dope I made a thread months ago about doin something like this and everyone that commented basically was giving me **** for it..
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
Just saw this box and think it's dope I made a thread months ago about doin something like this and everyone that commented basically was giving me **** for it..
just looked at that thread... shade city
- 20,064
- 10,951
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
I should've looked harder, because ___s were talking about $200 and I wasn't about to pay that at all
Never ended up getting them because of that, and I never will out of respect to my self control back then.
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
to keep it 100 I had zero shot on banneds & a nter gave me one of the only oops ive ever gotten on here ...Mikey23 copped for me, met me at the outlet 3-4 days later when I was finally free & gave em to me for box flat
I should've looked harder, because ___s were talking about $200 and I wasn't about to pay that at all
Never ended up getting them because of that, and I never will out of respect to my self control back then.
otherwise I would've been trying to talk down people too & possibly still not have a set
Last edited:
- 7,967
- 6,827
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
Forgot about 09 shadows. And those sat for a very long time. Think hit the sales rack in some areas. It's crazy how things change.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
Yup!!! Bout to clean my pair and start wearing them again.
- 16,006
- 4,734
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
QFT
- 2,773
- 634
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2001
Love the 09 shadows despite the jumpman. Such great quality. I missed out on a pair a couple years ago and was never able to find another one
