- 8,799
- 10,386
But you said you got a pair of used OG grapes...that were too small...
You went raw on a pair that used?
You went raw on a pair that used?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
um ..........I rocked some BEAT OG Grapes like 3 years back when I copped for cheap and had my trusty cobbler ghetto swap them. I don't care about size (natural fit is 11 but I'll rock 9.5 to 12.5 if it is heat) but I'm pretty sure they were 11, so that'd be 10.5 in today's sizing.
Anyways, just as comfortable with the usual thick padding and my toes weren't fighting the leather. But at the end of the day the 2000 and 2006's but the latter two look much cleaner in the toebox imo.
I clean up anything I rock, blast it with that Febreeze, isopropyl alcohol, compressed air, etc. I had to clean some moldy Mars IVs before and I had no problem rocking them TBH.But you said you got a pair of used OG grapes...that were too small...
You went raw on a pair that used?
View media item 1950757
I still have my 07 pair and the soles are still intact. No cracking what so ever. I'm still going to get this years version, though.Don't sleep on these. The new midsoles from 2006+ take much longer to dry rot and while feeling like cement bricks, will stand the test of time.
The durabuck on those is beginning to age, not too bad the like the burnt looking OGs, but don't sleep when you find out they need to be tennis balled.Having my 00' pair sole swapped at the moment so I think I'll pass on this release
I guess it's the stuff I used to thrift that made me adapt. When I was 8, I used to rock the patent leather Chicagos that were 2 sizes too big because I begged my parents for them.Japanese feet having MF..
How you walk G?
The NA on the Maroon on some retail pairs looks like it was rendered on an N64, it's too bulky and hairy, looks like it wasn't shaved for 25 years.I've seen a couple of pictures of the maroon 6s before they released and the nike air looked the sane way but they fix it and it looks fine they're probably going to do the same for these
Most of the photos you seen of these are unauthorized pairs (black netting, blue tinted, and Jordan on the outsole). Here is a photo of a sample pair from the Nike article:I've seen a couple of pictures of the maroon 6s before they released and the nike air looked the sane way but they fix it and it looks fine they're probably going to do the same for these
they could def make them with blue soles.Most of the photos you seen of these are unauthorized pairs (black netting, blue tinted, and Jordan on the outsole). Here is a photo of a sample pair from the Nike article:
View media item 1855023
I don't mind that, but milky soles would look fresh on these. Also, 2000 NA>1990 and 2016 NA, they're too low and a bit too big.they could def make them with blue soles.
I don't mind that, but milky soles would look fresh on these. Also, 2000 NA>1990 and 2016 NA, they're too low and a bit too big.they could def make them with blue soles.
I don't mind that, but milky soles would look fresh on these. Also, 2000 NA>1990 and 2016 NA, they're too low and a bit too big.they could def make them with blue soles.
A retro can't be better than the original. That's like heresy.
The 1994 III's make the 1988's look like garbage. 4's are barely worse because somebody failed in the netting department. The WC4's from 1999 have a better shade of gray and doesn't have OD speckling that looks like somebody got blasted with a shotgun (2016 especially). 5's are a quite a bit better because of better NA placement, Durabuck, and toebox. 2000 6's win because of better Durabuck and because the Midnight Navy 6 is partially responsible for global warming. 2000 11's are basically the same, inb4 the OG's go crazy because "2000 leather quality is garbage lalalalalalalala".A retro can't be better than the original. That's like heresy.
I don't like it when they turn green, but if they meet somewhere in the middle, it'd be fire.Please no milky soles
no, either make them bore tinted, or go back to translucent clear solesThe 1994 III's make the 1988's look like garbage. 4's are barely worse because somebody failed in the netting department. The WC4's from 1999 have a better shade of gray and doesn't have OD speckling that looks like somebody got blasted with a shotgun (2016 especially). 5's are a quite a bit better because of better NA placement, Durabuck, and toebox. 2000 6's win because of better Durabuck and because the Midnight Navy 6 is partially responsible for global warming. 2000 11's are basically the same, inb4 the OG's go crazy because "2000 leather quality is garbage lalalalalalalala".A retro can't be better than the original. That's like heresy.
I don't like it when they turn green, but if they meet somewhere in the middle, it'd be fire.Please no milky soles