People really do that?!?
what I said was pretty clear.
finally wearing a DS pair of metallics once you find out they are dropping again is not the same is wearing them to flex in others. In one situation you are wearing your DS pair because you know another is on the way so you don't have to worry about not messing the old pair up anymore. in the other you are trying to flex on others by showing that you have the older model that the majority of others may not have due to time and rarity. Two dif scenarios.
Thin Aquabuck is better than ashbuckuede that they used on the 2011 BM5 and Last Shots. Let's get real here.
It's kinda thin, a litter thinner than the 2K one. TBH I like it.
Who touches their shoes again?
It's the same as the 1991 Black Infrared 6. It's this oily Durabuck that gets really crusty and ugly and has been out of production for 20 years. The 2000\2006 with Nike durabuck aged 100x better than the OG and that's what we got on the Aquas and Alt 5 Lows as well.
thats what we'll get.
it's actually Durabuck. Nike used it a lot of OG retros. It's a synthetic leather they can use to look like leather or Nubuck.
They didn't use it on the 2014 retro infrared 6. I was trying to figure out what made the 91 ver feel different than the 14 ver. It was that material especially at the back heels part and also the fact that the tongue of the shoes were higher than the retros. Also the silhouette of the toes were slimmer back then with darker infrareds. All in all, I'd be head over heels if I can get something like the 91 infrared 6s soon.
