BaltimoreLove
formerly peterjamesthe3rd
- May 17, 2006
- 2,011
- 393
Might paint the white uppers boack
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like my pair. For those wondering the fit is easily TTS but that first try on will be tough. The shoe is tight up top initially but feels great IMO. I think the minor tweaks are beneficial (shoe wont crease as bad with no leather) and the purple air bag looks good. Clear air bag yellows or clouds anyhow.
You must be really young. Brown or sweetness is the the goat, toss up.
The kids do not appreciate the greatness that was Jim Brown.
I like my pair. For those wondering the fit is easily TTS but that first try on will be tough. The shoe is tight up top initially but feels great IMO. I think the minor tweaks are beneficial (shoe wont crease as bad with no leather) and the purple air bag looks good. Clear air bag yellows or clouds anyhow.
So let's think about this. Barry Sanders played in the NFL OVER 25 years ago, he CLEARLY could have shattered every record, with the weakest non existent offensive line ever, without any other players on his team, and you really think he is not the best? Due to him being so humble, he chose NOT to break the all time record. If you really think, I am a "kid" because of the FACTS that I stated you should really make some money off of what you are selling, because that some good stuff! Haha! You really assumed I am a kid or just looking for Internet props. Seriously though assuming is NOT good.
Sanders had a playoff game with negative yards. You can't in one breath say he's the best because his line sucked and he still got off. Then turn around and blame the line for all his bad games he didn't get off in.
He's a great player but not in Jim Browns class. He never would have had negative yards for a game. He hurt more defenders then they hurt him.
Actually, you can make that claim. Nobody would have done anything with that line. He might as well been receiving punts by himself all game. He was hit in the backfield so many damn times. Sometimes before he even touched the ball. Jim Brown had a strong team around him. It he lions shouldn't have even won a game, let alone made it to the playoffs.
You don't get it. You can't credit him for all the good and then turn around and place none of the blame on him when the Lions came up short. If he was beating teams by himself then he should have done it when the stage was biggest.
By the Barry supporters logic Rice or Montana couldn't be considered the best because they had each other. You guys are basically penalizing players because they played on good teams. The best players on bad teams are really the greatest players? It's a joke argument.
Succeed how? Losing in the first round with negative yardage isn't succeeding! Ha ha ha
Winning the SuperBowl is success. Your definition of success is screwed up. It's loser talk and a losers mentality. I'll destroy you whole argument now by asking you who the best QB All Time is? It can't be any QB that's played on a good team because the ones who did most with less are the best right?
Archie Manning comes to mind as someone who fits the criteria.
Brown is the best and he won the equivalent of the SuperBowl. Your argument in any other sports discussion is laughable and doesn't work. It only works for Barry Sanders and that's what makes it a joke. You can't tell me who your best QB all time is because you know it wouldn't make sense. Way to avoid that.
Your saying what he would have done. As if he had no chance of injury or he wouldn't have fallen off as he aged. Emmit is better. He has the yards and rings. He avoided kill shots and lasted a long time. Dallas started 0-2 without him and with all those same great players. He came back they took off and won the SB again.
I'm not putting words in your mouth. You said, "Winning the SuperBowl is success". I just applied your logic. Using your logic Emmit Smith is better than Jim brown because Emmit has the yards and more rings than Jim Brown. Anything else is losers logic. If you actually read what I said you would see that I admitted that fact to you. The logic doesn't apply to anyone else because he is an outlier. He shouldn't exist. He has the most negative yards because on nearly every single play he was hit in the backfield. The passing game was such a joke nobody cared about them. He was that entire team and was the closest to a one man team we would ever see.I never said winning is everything. Your putting words in my mouth. You gloss over the fact Barry had the most negative yards in NFL history. Half of that was him dancing and running backwards. He hurt the team many times in a team sport tryna do it all himself.
Just answer this and stop avoiding it. Who is the best QB all time in your opinion? I want to see how your logic applies to anyone other then Barry.
So from now until the end of time, no matter how many yards a players runs for or how much he wins. Unless he plays behind a bad line they can never be considered better the Barry? Am I right with this statement?