- Jan 27, 2013
- 14,841
- 26,256
Just looks mammoth. Hopefully it's just some kind of unfinished sample and the final model looks more polished
Nike Greater Than Series (Cut/Run/Jump)
- Thread in 'Nike' Thread starter Started by talonmarko,
- Start date
- Aug 6, 2014
- 3,587
- 1,299
They look aight. They look lower compared to the first ones. Same clunky heel tho and they added more plastic material
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
the GT series didn't appeal to resellers either. it was not til people started hyping them that resellers started paying attention as well. they look good to me to be honest. looks like a fusion of nike trainers and Why Nots with subtle hint of a jordan 2.Nike did their best **** this up so it doesn’t appeal to resellers
Hopefully it’s a great performer
- Jan 2, 2014
- 4,855
- 7,401
Nike did their best **** this up so it doesn’t appeal to resellers
Hopefully it’s a great performer
Unfortunately they pissed off the buyers too!
- Aug 9, 2014
- 12,852
- 28,005
I’m good on those 
Maybe the Jump/Run will be fire
Maybe the Jump/Run will be fire
- May 11, 2017
- 17,426
- 26,970
Lol at making the GT Cut 2’s uglier and still never doing a real wide release of a lot of the first Cut/Run/Jump colorways
- Apr 30, 2002
- 7,645
- 9,737
Nike Air Oscillate, Pete Sampras sneaker designed by Tinker Hatfield
- Jan 22, 2007
- 13,304
- 12,723
Idk which model Nike has made uglier in only one year, the cuts, cosmic unities or freaks 
this is what i dont get
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
maybe the GT line became so popular that it threaten the sales of their more expensive retro line. they could be saving those designs for the remastered retros.
- May 11, 2012
- 4,736
- 5,777
2 out of those 3 shoes you mentioned, imo, look like trash anyways, so I’m not surprised the Cut 2s look terrible now that I am framing it based on your comment
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
I only like 1 aspect of it and them looking like trainers which I use as well. 2s and Why Not's didn't cut it for me.2 out of those 3 shoes you mentioned, imo, look like trash anyways, so I’m not surprised the Cut 2s look terrible now that I am framing it based on your comment
- Oct 10, 2014
- 2,536
- 12,232
- May 11, 2017
- 17,426
- 26,970
Those really look like some **** that would be in JC Penny’s or Kohl’s lol no name department store type ****
- Jan 25, 2006
- 9,607
- 5,618
this is said every year, with every basketball shoe that ever releases.
opinions change once we get official pics, PE's, etc.
- May 11, 2012
- 4,736
- 5,777
Downgrade from the 1st iteration looks-wise, no doubt, but I bet these will be performance monsters once again…
- Feb 11, 2013
- 3,311
- 2,921
They look better than the 1st one IMO. Looks like there is more midfoot support.
- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
I dig them better compared to the GT Runs.
- May 11, 2017
- 17,426
- 26,970
- Apr 15, 2019
- 483
- 767
That upper is giving serious Kobe 7 vibes.
- Dec 15, 2017
- 17,811
- 43,327
Different colorways could save this, but other than that and the fact it could have the same specs as the first model, I won’t mind pulling the trigger on these.
#ResellerRepellent
- Aug 6, 2014
- 3,587
- 1,299
Cons of the 1s were the weight, clunky heels, and “React” insoles that weren’t really reacts.
Looks like they made it worse. They added more unnecessary plastic and the midsoles look bulkier/clunkier. I really wonder what’s the reason behind.
Looks like they made it worse. They added more unnecessary plastic and the midsoles look bulkier/clunkier. I really wonder what’s the reason behind.
- Jul 1, 2014
- 10,517
- 8,973
I wouldn't mind trying them if they can fit my wide foot... But Idk they kinda look like you'd find them at modells...
- Oct 31, 2009
- 28,787
- 12,000
That’s a very unattractive looking shoe
- Jan 26, 2019
- 2,564
- 2,633
Huge downgrade in appearance but at least they removed the plastic piece from the first pair that destroyed my pinky toes.
