- 1,836
- 45
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
Not even close to the originals. And the originals weren't that great to begin with. Nike, you suck.
Nike Total Griffey Max â99 â 2012 via SneakerFiles
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by brain9i6,
- Start date
- 4,853
- 15
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2010
Those Originals areOriginally Posted by PanaRicanRetro
I was excited at first because I've been wanting these forever but when I really looked at it, I saw it was typical Nike Retro BS. Nothing close to the OG. I don't understand why they can do it for some shoes but not for others.
Way to ruin another classic Nike..
- 4,853
- 15
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2010
Those Originals areOriginally Posted by PanaRicanRetro
I was excited at first because I've been wanting these forever but when I really looked at it, I saw it was typical Nike Retro BS. Nothing close to the OG. I don't understand why they can do it for some shoes but not for others.
Way to ruin another classic Nike..
- 4,966
- 5,495
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2010
these are one of the Griffey's that im not a fan of
- 4,966
- 5,495
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2010
these are one of the Griffey's that im not a fan of
- 11
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2002
Close enough...I like em
- 11
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2002
Close enough...I like em
- 6,584
- 2,534
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2003
Nike rep.
- 6,584
- 2,534
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2003
Nike rep.
- 11
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2002
^^I wish...I been on nt for 9 years just don't post. I have a real life but I'm networking now...
- 11
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2002
^^I wish...I been on nt for 9 years just don't post. I have a real life but I'm networking now...
- 17
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
hmm,,,
- 17
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
hmm,,,
- 696
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2011
I'll PASS
- 696
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2011
I'll PASS
- 70,049
- 24,222
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
Originally Posted by PanaRicanRetro
I was excited at first because I've been wanting these forever but when I really looked at it, I saw it was typical Nike Retro BS. Nothing close to the OG. I don't understand why they can do it for some shoes but not for others.
yeah they have a TOTALLY different midsole/outsole....looks like da retro got a straight rip from da griffey VI's
- 70,049
- 24,222
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
Originally Posted by PanaRicanRetro
I was excited at first because I've been wanting these forever but when I really looked at it, I saw it was typical Nike Retro BS. Nothing close to the OG. I don't understand why they can do it for some shoes but not for others.
yeah they have a TOTALLY different midsole/outsole....looks like da retro got a straight rip from da griffey VI's
polorico
Banned
- 1,188
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
i like those white based OGs . id rock those.
polorico
Banned
- 1,188
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
i like those white based OGs . id rock those.
- 794
- 710
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2008
Wait, what? *facepalm*
How is it they are retroing this garbage and not the diamond furys yet? Those are the obvious next thing to retro, or should be, if nike would get its act together...
How is it they are retroing this garbage and not the diamond furys yet? Those are the obvious next thing to retro, or should be, if nike would get its act together...
- 794
- 710
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2008
Wait, what? *facepalm*
How is it they are retroing this garbage and not the diamond furys yet? Those are the obvious next thing to retro, or should be, if nike would get its act together...
How is it they are retroing this garbage and not the diamond furys yet? Those are the obvious next thing to retro, or should be, if nike would get its act together...
- 56,189
- 27,427
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2006
Finally got a better look at the catalog pics with a bigger monitor... Just noticed the faux 'carbon' on the heel-flames. WTH.
Yeah, these are early sample pics, so the final blocking of the midsole might be more true to the OG's, but really, who chooses what to retro?
First the G6 (which wasn't a bad shoe, but just not on the top of my Griffey retro list) and now these???
I'd expect the Griffey 3's first before these...
Yeah, these are early sample pics, so the final blocking of the midsole might be more true to the OG's, but really, who chooses what to retro?
First the G6 (which wasn't a bad shoe, but just not on the top of my Griffey retro list) and now these???
I'd expect the Griffey 3's first before these...
- 56,189
- 27,427
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2006
Finally got a better look at the catalog pics with a bigger monitor... Just noticed the faux 'carbon' on the heel-flames. WTH.
Yeah, these are early sample pics, so the final blocking of the midsole might be more true to the OG's, but really, who chooses what to retro?
First the G6 (which wasn't a bad shoe, but just not on the top of my Griffey retro list) and now these???
I'd expect the Griffey 3's first before these...
Yeah, these are early sample pics, so the final blocking of the midsole might be more true to the OG's, but really, who chooses what to retro?
First the G6 (which wasn't a bad shoe, but just not on the top of my Griffey retro list) and now these???
I'd expect the Griffey 3's first before these...
- 1,922
- 147
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
Dat carbon fauxber.
- 1,922
- 147
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
Dat carbon fauxber.
