No basketball till October :(

Who do you think will win?

  • Cavaliers in 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Cavaliers in 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Cavaliers in 6

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Cavaliers in 7

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Warriors in 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Warriors in 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Warriors in 6

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Warriors in 7

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
Show All
Status
Not open for further replies.
The funny thing is besides JR and lebreezy, this cavs team is quite likeable.

Well i guess some people hate shumo. And blatt. But besides that. Nobody liked Dion. Or love and sideshow bob.
 
Last edited:
DubA169 said:
The funny thing is besides JR and lebreezy, this cavs team is quite likeable.

Well i guess some people hate shumo. And blatt. But besides that. Nobody liked Dion. Or love and sideshow bob.
Click to expand...
Why don't you like Jr he's a very funny character.
 
DarthSka said:
 
Originally Posted by Based Jesus  
Curiosity about what and why is where it differs for individuals, but we all have an agenda. You can watch just hoping to see a fight. It's a weird agenda but it is one. That's what I'm trying to say.
Click to expand...
If I could put where our difference seems to be, I think it's here: it doesn't seem that you believe one can be curious without a hope. It seems you think any curiosity is also tied to SOME form of hope.

"I'm curious what the soup is today. I hope is clam chowder. I'll go see."

"I'm curious what this blind date looks like. I hope she's blonde. Let's go see."

"I'm curious if GSW fans showed up today. I hope they didn't. I'll log in and see."

If that's the case, it doesn't seem like you think this next part is even possible, and this is how I am sometimes:

"I'm curious what the soup is today. I'll go see." (No hope for anything, no preference for a specific outcome; just curious. Not curiously looking; just curious, open to all possibilities.)

"I'm curious what this blind date looks like. Let's go see." (No hope for anything, no preference for a specific outcome; just curious. Not curiously looking; just curious, open to all possibilities.)

"I'm curious if GSW fans showed up today. I'll log in and see." (No hope for anything, no preference for a specific outcome; just curious. Not curiously looking; just curious, open to all possibilities.)
Click to expand...
I do believe you need a reason to be curious, that curiousity is sparked by something. I honestly can't fathom just being curious for no reason.

If I'm curious it's because I want to know something and there's a reason I want to know. And where there's a want there's a hope.

If I don't care then I don't bother myself with it. If I'm curious about the soupe du jour, then it's because I want soup and I'm hoping it's a soup I like.

If I'm curious about what my blind date looks like, then It's because I want to know what she looks like, because I'm hoping she's attractive.

If I'm curious about GSW fans showing their e-faces in the finals thread, then it's because I want to know their opinion on what happened, thus I'm hoping to see them.

Curiosity for the sake of curiosity is a foreign concept to me. I literally can't imagine it.

Also my agenda point still stands. Even if you're just curious you still committed actions to sate your curiosity with sating your curiosity being the agenda.
 
I want to think the Warriors close it in 5 but I can't see Cleveland losing two home games (3/4), it just doesn't seem possible. This has the look and feel of a 6/7 gamer.
I do feel confident Kerr will make the necessary adjustments to get the Warriors' offense going again. I expect Curry to bounce back and have a good game tomorrow.
 
DarthSka said:
[quote name="itsaboutthattime"]Good lord this troll

View media item 1572236
Click to expand...
A C+??!!?!?!one?!1

:lol:

That boy Skip. :rofl:

Like I alluded to with a-friend a-friend last night, the negative is worth mentioning; Bron did miss that first of 2 FTs that could have put the Cavs up 2. That's worth mentioning, because it happened.

But a C+?

Bruh. :lol:[/quote]

Yea I caught that C+, had it playing in the background.
I cut it off immediately, I need to see SAS facial expressions and whatnot on how disgusted he is with the comment.

I don't know man, show is greatness during the NBA playoffs. I wish it weren't so cool to hate on it on GP. I hate it too, but only when it sucks.
 
Last edited:
A1RMAN said:
 
Lebrick & JR Brick, Wardell & Klay TAKE NOTES. Alvin Gentry knows.

Click to expand...

sick.gif
 disgusting
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom