- 82
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2008
Originally Posted by PurpHeartGrapes
How could you not put Gallery on that list? Seriously, he was drafted as a tackle, the number 2 pick. Yet, you want to lift his bust label, because he is finally making a contribution at LG. Tony Mandarich is still considered a monumental bust, yet he also finally made contributions with the Colts.Originally Posted by oANONYMOUS1o
Talking about don't even add Gallery to the list, when he's obviously making solid contributions at LG for us. How is that not an impact on this team?
And yes the Browns had a worse draft. Their defense is pure garbage and they drafted two Wr's with their first 3 picks. Basically ignoring the defense for the better parts of the draft.
Although I don't agree with the Browns draft strategy, keep in mind, that one of their receivers has a foot out the door (Edwards) and another will be wearing a different type of uniform next season (Stallworth). That being said, I don't know about Robiskie (slow) and Massequoi (Underachiever), but they were second round picks. They also reached on Alex Mack, but hey it's the Browns, and there is a reason why they are the Browns.
Son just compared Robert Gallery to Tony Mandarich
Are you that dense that you call that a straight comparison.
I'm just laughing that you put him on your "impact" list,
Fargas was a steal in 2003 and he rewarde you with a 1K season in 2007, Bush was a steal in 2007. Then McFadden comes along, Fargas production goes down while Bush and DMac are good for less than 500 yds each. I'm not saying they are not talented individuals, because they are very talented. However, what good is DMac if you are only making him a part time RB.
Please elaborate on whatever point you were trying to make above. So because Fargas and Bush were steals they're "impact" on the team is void? FOH. Once again you're another blockhead making speculations and coming to your own conclusions when you don't know anything about our team!
, the point went right over their head. Who said their"impact" on the team is void because they were steals? I said since they got DMac, their production declined. If you are going to draft someonewith DMac's talent, why make him a part time RB, instead of unleashing him on the League.
Funny thing is you call me a blockhead.
Drafting DMac as your 4th pick, questionable. The Raiders were already getting production from their backfield. If they wanted to give Fargas, Bush & Co.some help, since Fargas is getting long in the tooth and Bush was coming off an injury, why not draft a Matt Forte in the 2nd round. Another possibility sincethe Raiders love speed, why not trade the pick and pick up Chris Johnson in the 20's. Instead they draft McFadden, waste his talent by making him a parttime RB.
Sorry I had to spell it out for you.