- 17,246
- 73
- Joined
- May 19, 2004
maybe Owen Marecic out of Stanford.
Official 2011 NFL Draft Thead Vol. Lions winning.... Niners losing...
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by ValarMorghulis,
- Start date
- 17,246
- 73
- Joined
- May 19, 2004
maybe Owen Marecic out of Stanford.
- 28,043
- 10,466
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
^ Bit undersized and not the greatest blocker, but Havili from U$C is good out of the backfield.
- 28,043
- 10,466
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
^ Bit undersized and not the greatest blocker, but Havili from U$C is good out of the backfield.
- 28,059
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
Andrew Perloff of Sports Illustrated has Blaine Gabbert going first overall?!?
http://sportsillustrated....aft/index.html?eref=sihp
http://sportsillustrated....aft/index.html?eref=sihp
- 28,059
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
Andrew Perloff of Sports Illustrated has Blaine Gabbert going first overall?!?
http://sportsillustrated....aft/index.html?eref=sihp
http://sportsillustrated....aft/index.html?eref=sihp
elpablo21
Supporter
- 105,436
- 193,076
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
Mclovin'Originally Posted by dland24
Andrew Perloff of Sports Illustrated has Blaine Gabbert going first overall?!?
http://sportsillustrated....aft/index.html?eref=sihp
Is Gabbert really that good?
elpablo21
Supporter
- 105,436
- 193,076
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
Mclovin'Originally Posted by dland24
Andrew Perloff of Sports Illustrated has Blaine Gabbert going first overall?!?
http://sportsillustrated....aft/index.html?eref=sihp
Is Gabbert really that good?
D
Deleted member 37754
Guest
Gabbert??.............. wow.
thats just a huge reach for him.
D
Deleted member 37754
Guest
Gabbert??.............. wow.
thats just a huge reach for him.
- 2,950
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
- 2,950
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
- 10,371
- 653
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
Carolina has to take Nick Fairley first now.
- 10,371
- 653
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
Carolina has to take Nick Fairley first now.
D
Deleted member 37754
Guest
Yea I wouldn't think about touching any of them until mid to late second personally. Would never touch Mallett, recipe for disaster. I would still consider Locker if it was a team with talent around him. Not his fault washington had No body. that would be the only QB i'd consider. Not a deep draft for that position.Originally Posted by KingJames23
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
and like you said it will get him (Gabbert) praise, Qb driven league and so few actually win without one. This is one of the weaker drafts in recent memory.
too much "potential" and not enough polished NFL prospects. should be a very interesting draft.
D
Deleted member 37754
Guest
Yea I wouldn't think about touching any of them until mid to late second personally. Would never touch Mallett, recipe for disaster. I would still consider Locker if it was a team with talent around him. Not his fault washington had No body. that would be the only QB i'd consider. Not a deep draft for that position.Originally Posted by KingJames23
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
and like you said it will get him (Gabbert) praise, Qb driven league and so few actually win without one. This is one of the weaker drafts in recent memory.
too much "potential" and not enough polished NFL prospects. should be a very interesting draft.
- 6,744
- 1,198
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
Andy Dalton though?? He doesn't have the arm to compete at the next level. Same problem as Matt Leinart, they win in college but he can't make the throws needed to play at the next level.Originally Posted by KingJames23
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
- 6,744
- 1,198
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
Andy Dalton though?? He doesn't have the arm to compete at the next level. Same problem as Matt Leinart, they win in college but he can't make the throws needed to play at the next level.Originally Posted by KingJames23
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
- 2,950
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
Originally Posted by im that one
Yea I wouldn't think about touching any of them until mid to late second personally. Would never touch Mallett, recipe for disaster. I would still consider Locker if it was a team with talent around him. Not his fault washington had No body. that would be the only QB i'd consider. Not a deep draft for that position.Originally Posted by KingJames23
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
and like you said it will get him (Gabbert) praise, Qb driven league and so few actually win without one. This is one of the weaker drafts in recent memory.
too much "potential" and not enough polished NFL prospects. should be a very interesting draft.
I am a huge fan of Locker. He went from being the #1 pick last year to being a guaranteed bust in 1 season. Locker has all the physical tools to be great but he needs time. His inaccuracy is due to mechanical things that can be fixed and his decision making needs work. Although he is more accurate on the move. But his intangibles are very good and is the type of guy that can lead.
Mallett can't deal with pressure (pass rush and late game situation) and with questionable character, can't touch him.
This draft had the potential to be very good. But so many guys going back to school positions of depth (CB and WR) are thinning out and a once in a decade type of player like Luck kills a draft.
I personally love this type of draft where there is no clear #1 pick and many positions don't have a clear #1 player, it's gonna test the scouting departments across the league. I love watching a #%%! ton of games and making a big board and mock draft. Nothing like draft time
- 2,950
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
Originally Posted by im that one
Yea I wouldn't think about touching any of them until mid to late second personally. Would never touch Mallett, recipe for disaster. I would still consider Locker if it was a team with talent around him. Not his fault washington had No body. that would be the only QB i'd consider. Not a deep draft for that position.Originally Posted by KingJames23
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
and like you said it will get him (Gabbert) praise, Qb driven league and so few actually win without one. This is one of the weaker drafts in recent memory.
too much "potential" and not enough polished NFL prospects. should be a very interesting draft.
I am a huge fan of Locker. He went from being the #1 pick last year to being a guaranteed bust in 1 season. Locker has all the physical tools to be great but he needs time. His inaccuracy is due to mechanical things that can be fixed and his decision making needs work. Although he is more accurate on the move. But his intangibles are very good and is the type of guy that can lead.
Mallett can't deal with pressure (pass rush and late game situation) and with questionable character, can't touch him.
This draft had the potential to be very good. But so many guys going back to school positions of depth (CB and WR) are thinning out and a once in a decade type of player like Luck kills a draft.
I personally love this type of draft where there is no clear #1 pick and many positions don't have a clear #1 player, it's gonna test the scouting departments across the league. I love watching a #%%! ton of games and making a big board and mock draft. Nothing like draft time
D
Deleted member 37754
Guest
^^
dalton wouldnt be a bad pickup in later rounds. I do think he is a bit pennington but with the right offense i dont see how he wouldnt be successful.
he'llbe reliable. always low on the Ints and has a real good ratio. knows how to lead. can win some games. but a later rounds pick for sure.
dalton wouldnt be a bad pickup in later rounds. I do think he is a bit pennington but with the right offense i dont see how he wouldnt be successful.
he'llbe reliable. always low on the Ints and has a real good ratio. knows how to lead. can win some games. but a later rounds pick for sure.
D
Deleted member 37754
Guest
^^
dalton wouldnt be a bad pickup in later rounds. I do think he is a bit pennington but with the right offense i dont see how he wouldnt be successful.
he'llbe reliable. always low on the Ints and has a real good ratio. knows how to lead. can win some games. but a later rounds pick for sure.
dalton wouldnt be a bad pickup in later rounds. I do think he is a bit pennington but with the right offense i dont see how he wouldnt be successful.
he'llbe reliable. always low on the Ints and has a real good ratio. knows how to lead. can win some games. but a later rounds pick for sure.
- 2,950
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
Originally Posted by airblaster503
Andy Dalton though?? He doesn't have the arm to compete at the next level. Same problem as Matt Leinart, they win in college but he can't make the throws needed to play at the next level.Originally Posted by KingJames23
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
Arm strength is the most overrated aspect for a QB. Once you hit a certain minimum a QB will be fine (Chad Pennington was a good starter in the league). He has adequate arm strength. He showed a lot in that Rose Bowl performance, his confidence and poise are things that just can't be taught.
Leinart was running around with great, great players and was soft. He didn't have "it". Watch the way Dalton commands his team, leads, stands in the pocket in the face of pressure, and poise in late game situations.
He is indeed underrated. People have him profiled as a very late round pick and a career back up. I believe he can start in the league. That makes him underrated to me.
- 2,950
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
Originally Posted by airblaster503
Andy Dalton though?? He doesn't have the arm to compete at the next level. Same problem as Matt Leinart, they win in college but he can't make the throws needed to play at the next level.Originally Posted by KingJames23
Originally Posted by im that one
Gabbert??.............. wow.thats just a huge reach for him.
Agreed but he's arguably the best QB in this class and that's gonna get you consideration for the #1 pick
Personally wouldn't touch any of these QBs in the top 10. I wouldn't draft Mallett at all. Andy Dalton is a very underrated prospect.
Arm strength is the most overrated aspect for a QB. Once you hit a certain minimum a QB will be fine (Chad Pennington was a good starter in the league). He has adequate arm strength. He showed a lot in that Rose Bowl performance, his confidence and poise are things that just can't be taught.
Leinart was running around with great, great players and was soft. He didn't have "it". Watch the way Dalton commands his team, leads, stands in the pocket in the face of pressure, and poise in late game situations.
He is indeed underrated. People have him profiled as a very late round pick and a career back up. I believe he can start in the league. That makes him underrated to me.
D
Deleted member 37754
Guest
I like Locker a lot as well, and had he some kind of spec of talent on that washington offense all this Bust talk would be out of the window. All the games i saw he had less than a second to set and throw. Not gonna be very successful and will throw picks trying to do too much to win. He will pan out nicely with some hard work.Originally Posted by KingJames23
I am a huge fan of Locker. He went from being the #1 pick last year to being a guaranteed bust in 1 season. Locker has all the physical tools to be great but he needs time. His inaccuracy is due to mechanical things that can be fixed and his decision making needs work. Although he is more accurate on the move. But his intangibles are very good and is the type of guy that can lead.
Mallett can deal with pressure (pass rush and late game situation) and with questionable character, can't touch him.
This draft had the potential to be very good. But so many guys going back to school positions of depth (CB and WR) are thinning out and a once in a decade type of player like Luck kills a draft.
I personally love this type of draft where there is no clear #1 pick and many positions don't have a clear #1 player, it's gonna test the scouting departments across the league. I love watching a $%@* ton of games and making a big board and mock draft. Nothing like draft time
Oh i like this kind of draft because you'll get guys early you have never heard of and come out beastly. It's just a weak draft with QBs. These kinds of drafts make everything interesting as far as who you select and why.
Hopefully the dolphins dont f this one up... trade down, need to pick up more picks... just what i would do. thats off track tho.
Yea mallett just reminds me too much of huge problem and headache... im good off all that. any other position hey it works, it never has nor will work as a QB.
hahahahaha u i love doin that too. NFL fantasy time and i do it all the time on madden. I like doing that sometimes more then playing the game. doing all the FA and Drafting. Or rebuilding a team. i've always liked doing that.
