- 92,683
- 128,878
In Paul George's case: improving his ball handling, becoming an above average three point shooter, getting to the free throw line more, finishing better at/near the basket more effectively and cutting down on the turnovers (I'll cut him some slack since this past season was his first as a featured player) are more important than "averaging 20-25 points per game". Of course all that goes together with his stout defense and much needed playmaking for others.I think it's meaningless unless you put some context next to it.
And exactly what context would that be?
Basically whatever it takes to bring up the Pacers to an above average offensive team.
Last edited: