- 32,830
- 24,896
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
But the clips beat a banged up spurs team. That doesn't count.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Maybe if he would have benched Rivers and played TurkogluNo, but he's on the clock. They're still a piece or 2 away from contending so it not a true rebuild type of situationwould u fire Doc?
We're really going to do all this to discredit the Clips of beating the Spurs because y'all wanna call em losers
View media item 1539080
no no no. i think melo is the last thing CP would need. melo would sink the Clips into the pacificI really do think melo and cp could work. Melo needs a leader in cp while cp needs a prolific scorer which can take over a game. I bring this up time after time, melo went to the WCF with Chauncey.....albeit that was a well balanced team but I think you can build around those 2
hey chill man. Timmy Duncan is the best player out of the western conference since shaqCongrats they beat a team of AARP specialists that never repeated in their storied history. When's the 1st rd parade down Wilshire?
Whose that piece? kawhi Leonard?
Not ee'm a Clips fan.Congrats they beat a team of AARP specialists that never repeated in their storied history. When's the 1st rd parade down Wilshire?
Romanticism bro. It's the culture. One person gets all the credit for winning...and all the credit for losing.Basketball is a team sport
Why can't yall just say the whole Clippers squad blew it?![]()
Cp0 sucks, there, I said it.
Maybe if he would have benched Rivers and played Turkoglu
This "Never repeated" thing is so dumb
without slandering players. what was the biggest factor in the Clippers blowing this series?
without slandering players. what was the biggest factor in the Clippers blowing this series?
no no no. i think melo is the last thing CP would need. melo would sink the Clips into the pacific
I always see Duncan's Spurs get knocked for not repeating, but never Bird's Celtics.
*Shrugs*
Theres only one segment of fans from one teams fanbase that even subscribes to this crazy theory. One could say that the sustained excellence year after year is preferable to the mountain dynamic where the team rises to the top and falls within a 6 year window.Of course YOU would think that.This "Never repeated" thing is so dumb
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^I always see Duncan's Spurs get knocked for not repeating, but never Bird's Celtics.
*Shrugs*
- The Clippers role players uncharacteristically started giving them great production in the playoffs then over the past 3 games, they regressed to their mean in an epic fashion.
without slandering players. what was the biggest factor in the Clippers blowing this series?
thank you!!!! i'm readin these "never repeated" comments and am scratching my head.There's something to be said for defending a championship, bro.
What I think is dumb is when people think less of a team that hasn't repeated, ad if the original championship doesn't count.
Just ONE is what so many play for, but that doesn't count because they didn't repeat? Nah, they still won that first one.![]()
AceAcey in the case of the Spurs, they did it 5 times. Doesn't count because they were scattered? LiLi they go from 5 to 0 because none of those 5 were consecutive?![]()
Silly.