- 140,479
- 165,920
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2010
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Reaching the highest level 6 times and winning all 6 of those times in 6 or less games is overrated? Can't please anyone nowadays.he would be better than jordan if he got 6 IMOlets just say lebron turned his career around and was dominant and ended up winning 7 championships he would still never be the GOAT or better than jordan... lets not forget jordan was undefeated in the finals and never jumped to another team just to win a chip... he had to build his team up and make others better like pippin, grant, amstrong and kukoc and make it look like he had a "great" team when in reality he made ok players great
7 would be the nail in the coffin
"undefeated in the finals" is the most overrated accomplishment ever
If LeBron finishes say 6-2
lmao
"undefeated in the finals" is the most overrated accomplishment ever
I just don't see it happening Freeze. I take Lebron. 12/10 times right now
[thread="624605"] [/thread]
wonder how shiny that gift is gonna be when he's sittin at home with 2 rings...homie might have to regift
yup, and saying "he is 0-1 in the finals now he will never be better than MJ" is stupidFirst time doesn't count. That Cavs team wasn't supposed to be there. And he worked to get there. He did an elite job during that Pistons series.
give me a rep.
have a rep, this gave me a chuckle
please explain to me how never losing in the finals is overrated?
and jordan didnt join other superstars too...he built that franchiseLebron still needs 4 more championships
i got shoe mai ggive me a rep.
have a rep, this gave me a chuckle
speaking on todays game ,
assuming two players play the same amount of years
if one goes 5-3 in the finals and the other goes 5-0 in the finals
5-3 is more impressive because those three years he at least made the finals while the other guy never even got that far
both guys have won championships 5 out of the years they played but the first guy did all that and got to the finals an extra 3 times
if jordan was 6-2 in the finals that would be more impressive than being 6-0 in the finals
you know I'll always give you a repgive me a rep.
have a rep, this gave me a chuckle
alonzo gifWhy do people make a fuss about him not 'FINISHING'? At least he gets to tap it. Guys like Chris Paul and Javale McGee ain't even get a shot.
If Lebron or Magic, or whoever doesn't FINISH and has COMPLETION ANXIETY then who cares. Who the hell makes up these stupid stats anyways.
this is also true. it is a great accomplishment to get there but if the east sucks then its not that great
speaking on todays game ,
no it just means the conference you played in most likely sucks and you couldnt get it done against the real best team in the L . undefeated is still more impressive.,
First time doesn't count. That Cavs team wasn't supposed to be there. And he worked his *** off to get there. He did an elite job during that Pistons series.
i always rank finals wins first, tie breaker goes to the guy with more finals losses because that's better than not making the finalsI disagree.Originally Posted by sea manupcant speak for ska butOriginally Posted by GalaxyNexus6-0 > 6-3. He should've lost in the conference finals.Originally Posted by sea manup
magic was 9/12 in his career in making it to the finals
#Skalogic
6-0 > 5-4
however
6-0 < 6-4
championships are always the most important but getting to the finals is always better than not making it that far
5-4 > 6-0
Because there were years that Jordan made the playoffs but didn't make the Finals, which is the same outcome as losing the Finals. So Jordan is perfect in the Finals, but it's not like every time his team was a playoff contender they won it all. No.
But let me be quiet and let Nexus do my explaining since he knows #Skalogic.