- 8,161
- 21,012
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2002
Whose the dude that said yesterday that they'll never be a unanimous MVP? Expose yourself
View media item 2025721
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Whose the dude that said yesterday that they'll never be a unanimous MVP? Expose yourself
And STAT wise he was a great shooter. AND....? He's no Curry though. You think this dude is gonna phase out when he's getting BETTER every season?
LeBron in his prime, about to be too old. He's going to start taking money and fading away (rest of his hair too).
Curry not even in his prime yet
Too old to do what? As long as he in the East he in the Finals every yearAnd STAT wise he was a great shooter. AND....? He's no Curry though. You think this dude is gonna phase out when he's getting BETTER every season?
LeBron in his prime, about to be too old. He's going to start taking money and fading away (rest of his hair too).
Curry not even in his prime yet
These dudes say outlandish things and then go Mia
NahCurry would rock MJ too though...
Too old to do what? As long as he in the East he in the Finals every yearAnd STAT wise he was a great shooter. AND....? He's no Curry though. You think this dude is gonna phase out when he's getting BETTER every season?
LeBron in his prime, about to be too old. He's going to start taking money and fading away (rest of his hair too).
Curry not even in his prime yet
Too old to do what? As long as he in the East he in the Finals every yearAnd STAT wise he was a great shooter. AND....? He's no Curry though. You think this dude is gonna phase out when he's getting BETTER every season?
LeBron in his prime, about to be too old. He's going to start taking money and fading away (rest of his hair too).
Curry not even in his prime yet
*scratches head*
They are NOTHING alike.
Yes, Nash was a great, great shooter. He also shot very very little. He would shoot 45% on 350~ or so 3's a year. Steph just shot 45% on EIGHT HUNDRED THREE'S and many of them from several feet behind the line.
Nash was a 15-18 point scorer, Steph just put up 30. In 34 minutes a game.
Nash is not even close to the same type of player. You have no idea what you're talkin about, which is why you fit in here quite well.
Its 50/50 once u reach the Finals but he will always have a shot at least...And then he loses every year.
Nah he just will always have the best team it aint his fault all the stars dont wanna play on the ECso you're saying his numbers and everything are inflated and overrated because he's playing against marshmellows and gumdrops every night?
West is lowkey 'Nam.
Its 50/50 once u reach the Finals but he will always have a shot at least...And then he loses every year.
Btw, this is the NBA PLAYOFF THREAD.
A.I and Mike are irrelevant to this thread.
Take it over there.
-Future Admin.
Its 50/50 once u reach the Finals but he will always have a shot at least...And then he loses every year.
more like 33.3/66.6
Its 50/50 once u reach the Finals but he will always have a shot at least...
A chance to make diminish his legacy more
I disagree I've seen delly put the clamps on steph in the finals imagine what Jordan would do [emoji]129300[/emoji]you serious? Curry ould've had mike on skates. That's not a shot at mike. Kyrie would too. Handles are just too good. Good defenders are supposed to bite on a lot of things. pause. They have to assume that if you look like you're going this way, that you probably are. Mike would be food playing man up against those guys. His best best would be to deny deny deny them from ever getting the ball.
Its 50/50 once u reach the Finals but he will always have a shot at least...
Bro, you are more than welcomed at my NBA finals party
its not really 50/50 just because it's 2 options. It just appears that way from a macro view.
was it really 50/50 in '07? '14?
2007 and 2015 he had no chance of winning honestly